• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绩效预期、工作量、风险和满意度对信任 ChatGPT 的影响:横断面调查分析。

The Impact of Performance Expectancy, Workload, Risk, and Satisfaction on Trust in ChatGPT: Cross-Sectional Survey Analysis.

机构信息

Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 May 27;11:e55399. doi: 10.2196/55399.

DOI:10.2196/55399
PMID:38801658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11165287/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

ChatGPT (OpenAI) is a powerful tool for a wide range of tasks, from entertainment and creativity to health care queries. There are potential risks and benefits associated with this technology. In the discourse concerning the deployment of ChatGPT and similar large language models, it is sensible to recommend their use primarily for tasks a human user can execute accurately. As we transition into the subsequent phase of ChatGPT deployment, establishing realistic performance expectations and understanding users' perceptions of risk associated with its use are crucial in determining the successful integration of this artificial intelligence (AI) technology.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to explore how perceived workload, satisfaction, performance expectancy, and risk-benefit perception influence users' trust in ChatGPT.

METHODS

A semistructured, web-based survey was conducted with 607 adults in the United States who actively use ChatGPT. The survey questions were adapted from constructs used in various models and theories such as the technology acceptance model, the theory of planned behavior, the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, and research on trust and security in digital environments. To test our hypotheses and structural model, we used the partial least squares structural equation modeling method, a widely used approach for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 607 people responded to our survey. A significant portion of the participants held at least a high school diploma (n=204, 33.6%), and the majority had a bachelor's degree (n=262, 43.1%). The primary motivations for participants to use ChatGPT were for acquiring information (n=219, 36.1%), amusement (n=203, 33.4%), and addressing problems (n=135, 22.2%). Some participants used it for health-related inquiries (n=44, 7.2%), while a few others (n=6, 1%) used it for miscellaneous activities such as brainstorming, grammar verification, and blog content creation. Our model explained 64.6% of the variance in trust. Our analysis indicated a significant relationship between (1) workload and satisfaction, (2) trust and satisfaction, (3) performance expectations and trust, and (4) risk-benefit perception and trust.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings underscore the importance of ensuring user-friendly design and functionality in AI-based applications to reduce workload and enhance user satisfaction, thereby increasing user trust. Future research should further explore the relationship between risk-benefit perception and trust in the context of AI chatbots.

摘要

背景

ChatGPT(OpenAI)是一种功能强大的工具,可用于各种任务,从娱乐和创意到医疗保健查询。这项技术存在潜在的风险和益处。在讨论部署 ChatGPT 和类似的大型语言模型时,明智的做法是建议主要将其用于人类用户可以准确执行的任务。随着我们进入 ChatGPT 部署的下一阶段,确定其成功整合的关键是建立现实的性能预期并了解用户对其使用相关风险的看法。

目的

本研究旨在探讨感知工作负荷、满意度、绩效期望和风险收益感知如何影响用户对 ChatGPT 的信任。

方法

我们对 607 名美国积极使用 ChatGPT 的成年人进行了半结构式网络调查。调查问题改编自各种模型和理论中的建构,例如技术接受模型、计划行为理论、统一接受和使用技术理论以及数字环境中的信任和安全研究。为了检验我们的假设和结构模型,我们使用了偏最小二乘结构方程建模方法,这是一种广泛用于多变量分析的方法。

结果

共有 607 人回应了我们的调查。相当一部分参与者至少持有高中文凭(n=204,33.6%),大多数人持有学士学位(n=262,43.1%)。参与者使用 ChatGPT 的主要动机是获取信息(n=219,36.1%)、娱乐(n=203,33.4%)和解决问题(n=135,22.2%)。一些参与者将其用于与健康相关的查询(n=44,7.2%),而少数其他参与者(n=6,1%)将其用于头脑风暴、语法验证和博客内容创作等杂项活动。我们的模型解释了信任的 64.6%的方差。我们的分析表明,(1)工作量和满意度之间,(2)信任和满意度之间,(3)绩效期望和信任之间,以及(4)风险收益感知和信任之间存在显著关系。

结论

研究结果强调了确保基于人工智能的应用程序具有用户友好的设计和功能的重要性,以减少工作量并提高用户满意度,从而提高用户信任度。未来的研究应该进一步探索人工智能聊天机器人背景下风险收益感知与信任之间的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b7e/11165287/f42293f4296d/humanfactors_v11i1e55399_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b7e/11165287/e3f6a125d8b1/humanfactors_v11i1e55399_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b7e/11165287/f42293f4296d/humanfactors_v11i1e55399_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b7e/11165287/e3f6a125d8b1/humanfactors_v11i1e55399_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b7e/11165287/f42293f4296d/humanfactors_v11i1e55399_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of Performance Expectancy, Workload, Risk, and Satisfaction on Trust in ChatGPT: Cross-Sectional Survey Analysis.绩效预期、工作量、风险和满意度对信任 ChatGPT 的影响:横断面调查分析。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 May 27;11:e55399. doi: 10.2196/55399.
2
Investigating the Impact of User Trust on the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT: Survey Analysis.研究用户信任对 ChatGPT 采用和使用的影响:调查分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 14;25:e47184. doi: 10.2196/47184.
3
User Intentions to Use ChatGPT for Self-Diagnosis and Health-Related Purposes: Cross-sectional Survey Study.用户使用ChatGPT进行自我诊断及与健康相关目的的意图:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 May 17;10:e47564. doi: 10.2196/47564.
4
Perceptions of ChatGPT in healthcare: usefulness, trust, and risk.医疗保健领域对 ChatGPT 的认知:实用性、信任度和风险。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 13;12:1457131. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1457131. eCollection 2024.
5
Characterizing the Adoption and Experiences of Users of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Health Information in the United States: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.描述美国人工智能生成健康信息用户的采用和体验:横断面问卷调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 14;26:e55138. doi: 10.2196/55138.
6
Exploring factors influencing user perspective of ChatGPT as a technology that assists in healthcare decision making: A cross sectional survey study.探讨影响用户将 ChatGPT 视为医疗保健决策辅助技术的因素:一项横断面调查研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 8;19(3):e0296151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296151. eCollection 2024.
7
Medical Student Experiences and Perceptions of ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence: Cross-Sectional Study.医学生对 ChatGPT 和人工智能的体验和看法:一项横断面研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Dec 22;9:e51302. doi: 10.2196/51302.
8
Understanding Health Care Students' Perceptions, Beliefs, and Attitudes Toward AI-Powered Language Models: Cross-Sectional Study.理解医学生对人工智能语言模型的看法、信念和态度:横断面研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Aug 13;10:e51757. doi: 10.2196/51757.
9
Health Care Trainees' and Professionals' Perceptions of ChatGPT in Improving Medical Knowledge Training: Rapid Survey Study.医疗保健受训者和专业人员对 ChatGPT 在改善医学知识培训方面的看法:快速调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 18;25:e49385. doi: 10.2196/49385.
10
ChatGPT and the Future of Digital Health: A Study on Healthcare Workers' Perceptions and Expectations.ChatGPT与数字健康的未来:一项关于医护人员认知与期望的研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 21;11(13):1812. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131812.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of warning design features on risk perception and performance in remote emergency response.警示设计特征对远程应急响应中风险认知及表现的影响
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 12;15(1):25201. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10872-8.
2
Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare: advancing older adults' health management in Saudi Arabia through AI-powered chatbots.将人工智能(AI)整合到医疗保健中:通过人工智能驱动的聊天机器人推进沙特阿拉伯老年人的健康管理。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025 Mar 27;11:e2773. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2773. eCollection 2025.
3
The Impact of Chatbot Response Strategies and Emojis Usage on Customers' Purchase Intention: The Mediating Roles of Psychological Distance and Performance Expectancy.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating the Impact of User Trust on the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT: Survey Analysis.研究用户信任对 ChatGPT 采用和使用的影响:调查分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 14;25:e47184. doi: 10.2196/47184.
2
User Intentions to Use ChatGPT for Self-Diagnosis and Health-Related Purposes: Cross-sectional Survey Study.用户使用ChatGPT进行自我诊断及与健康相关目的的意图:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 May 17;10:e47564. doi: 10.2196/47564.
3
Artificial Intelligence Discusses the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Translational Medicine: A Interview With ChatGPT.
聊天机器人回复策略和表情符号使用对顾客购买意愿的影响:心理距离和绩效期望的中介作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 23;15(2):117. doi: 10.3390/bs15020117.
4
Healthcare professionals and the public sentiment analysis of ChatGPT in clinical practice.医疗保健专业人员与公众对ChatGPT在临床实践中的情感分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):1223. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84512-y.
人工智能探讨人工智能在转化医学中的作用:对ChatGPT的访谈
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2023 Jan 18;8(2):221-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2023.01.001. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
ChatGPT, An Artificial Intelligence Chatbot, Is Impacting Medical Literature.人工智能聊天机器人ChatGPT正在对医学文献产生影响。
Arthroscopy. 2023 May;39(5):1121-1122. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.01.015. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
5
ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence applications speed up scientific writing.ChatGPT和其他人工智能应用程序加快了科学写作的速度。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2023 Apr 1;86(4):351-353. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000900. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
6
I Asked a ChatGPT to Write an Editorial About How We Can Incorporate Chatbots Into Neurosurgical Research and Patient Care….我让ChatGPT撰写一篇关于我们如何将聊天机器人纳入神经外科研究和患者护理的社论……
Neurosurgery. 2023 Apr 1;92(4):663-664. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002414. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
7
Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing.使用ChatGPT生成学术内容:医学出版面临的伦理挑战。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Mar;5(3):e105-e106. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00019-5. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
8
AI for life: Trends in artificial intelligence for biotechnology.为生命服务的人工智能:生物技术领域人工智能的发展趋势
N Biotechnol. 2023 May 25;74:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
9
ChatGPT: can artificial intelligence language models be of value for cardiovascular nurses and allied health professionals.ChatGPT:人工智能语言模型对心血管护士和相关健康专业人员有价值吗?
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2023 Oct 19;22(7):e55-e59. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvad022.
10
ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models Are Double-edged Swords.ChatGPT和其他大型语言模型是双刃剑。
Radiology. 2023 Apr;307(2):e230163. doi: 10.1148/radiol.230163. Epub 2023 Jan 26.