• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

描述美国人工智能生成健康信息用户的采用和体验:横断面问卷调查研究。

Characterizing the Adoption and Experiences of Users of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Health Information in the United States: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

机构信息

Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 14;26:e55138. doi: 10.2196/55138.

DOI:10.2196/55138
PMID:39141910
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11358651/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

OpenAI's ChatGPT is a source of advanced online health information (OHI) that may be integrated into individuals' health information-seeking routines. However, concerns have been raised about its factual accuracy and impact on health outcomes. To forecast implications for medical practice and public health, more information is needed on who uses the tool, how often, and for what.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to characterize the reasons for and types of ChatGPT OHI use and describe the users most likely to engage with the platform.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional survey, patients received invitations to participate via the ResearchMatch platform, a nonprofit affiliate of the National Institutes of Health. A web-based survey measured demographic characteristics, use of ChatGPT and other sources of OHI, experience characterization, and resultant health behaviors. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Both 2-tailed t tests and Pearson chi-square tests were used to compare users of ChatGPT OHI to nonusers.

RESULTS

Of 2406 respondents, 21.5% (n=517) respondents reported using ChatGPT for OHI. ChatGPT users were younger than nonusers (32.8 vs 39.1 years, P<.001) with lower advanced degree attainment (BA or higher; 49.9% vs 67%, P<.001) and greater use of transient health care (ED and urgent care; P<.001). ChatGPT users were more avid consumers of general non-ChatGPT OHI (percentage of weekly or greater OHI seeking frequency in past 6 months, 28.2% vs 22.8%, P<.001). Around 39.3% (n=206) respondents endorsed using the platform for OHI 2-3 times weekly or more, and most sought the tool to determine if a consultation was required (47.4%, n=245) or to explore alternative treatment (46.2%, n=239). Use characterization was favorable as many believed ChatGPT to be just as or more useful than other OHIs (87.7%, n=429) and their doctor (81%, n=407). About one-third of respondents requested a referral (35.6%, n=184) or changed medications (31%, n=160) based on the information received from ChatGPT. As many users reported skepticism regarding the ChatGPT output (67.9%, n=336), most turned to their physicians (67.5%, n=349).

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the significant role of AI-generated OHI in shaping health-seeking behaviors and the potential evolution of patient-provider interactions. Given the proclivity of these users to enact health behavior changes based on AI-generated content, there is an opportunity for physicians to guide ChatGPT OHI users on an informed and examined use of the technology.

摘要

背景

OpenAI 的 ChatGPT 是一种高级在线健康信息(OHI)来源,可能会融入个人的健康信息搜索习惯中。然而,人们对其事实准确性及其对健康结果的影响表示担忧。为了预测对医疗实践和公共卫生的影响,我们需要更多关于谁在使用该工具、使用频率以及使用目的的信息。

目的

本研究旨在描述 ChatGPT OHI 使用的原因和类型,并描述最有可能使用该平台的用户。

方法

在这项横断面调查中,患者通过非营利性机构 ResearchMatch 平台收到参与邀请。一项基于网络的调查衡量了人口统计学特征、ChatGPT 和其他 OHI 来源的使用情况、体验特征以及由此产生的健康行为。使用描述性统计来总结数据。使用双侧 t 检验和 Pearson 卡方检验比较了 ChatGPT OHI 用户和非用户。

结果

在 2406 名受访者中,21.5%(n=517)的受访者报告使用 ChatGPT 进行 OHI。ChatGPT 用户比非用户年轻(32.8 岁比 39.1 岁,P<.001),获得高等学位的比例较低(BA 或更高学历;49.9%比 67%,P<.001),并且更频繁地使用临时医疗保健(急诊和紧急护理;P<.001)。ChatGPT 用户更热衷于一般的非 ChatGPT OHI(过去 6 个月每周或更多次 OHI 搜索频率,28.2%比 22.8%,P<.001)。约 39.3%(n=206)的受访者表示每周使用该平台进行 OHI 2-3 次或更多次,大多数人使用该平台来确定是否需要咨询(47.4%,n=245)或探索替代治疗方法(46.2%,n=239)。使用特征评价较好,许多人认为 ChatGPT 与其他 OHI 一样有用或更有用(87.7%,n=429),与他们的医生一样有用(81%,n=407)。约三分之一的受访者根据从 ChatGPT 收到的信息要求转介(35.6%,n=184)或改变药物治疗(31%,n=160)。由于许多用户对 ChatGPT 输出持怀疑态度(67.9%,n=336),因此大多数人会咨询他们的医生(67.5%,n=349)。

结论

本研究强调了 AI 生成的 OHI 在塑造健康搜索行为方面的重要作用,以及患者-提供者互动的潜在演变。鉴于这些用户倾向于根据 AI 生成的内容改变健康行为,医生有机会指导 ChatGPT OHI 用户明智地、经过深思熟虑地使用该技术。

相似文献

1
Characterizing the Adoption and Experiences of Users of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Health Information in the United States: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.描述美国人工智能生成健康信息用户的采用和体验:横断面问卷调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 14;26:e55138. doi: 10.2196/55138.
2
What Predicts Online Health Information-Seeking Behavior Among Egyptian Adults? A Cross-Sectional Study.什么因素能预测埃及成年人的在线健康信息搜索行为?一项横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 22;19(6):e216. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6855.
3
Medical Student Experiences and Perceptions of ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence: Cross-Sectional Study.医学生对 ChatGPT 和人工智能的体验和看法:一项横断面研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Dec 22;9:e51302. doi: 10.2196/51302.
4
The Impact of Performance Expectancy, Workload, Risk, and Satisfaction on Trust in ChatGPT: Cross-Sectional Survey Analysis.绩效预期、工作量、风险和满意度对信任 ChatGPT 的影响:横断面调查分析。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 May 27;11:e55399. doi: 10.2196/55399.
5
Online health information-seeking behaviors and skills of Chinese college students.中国大学生的在线健康信息搜索行为和技能。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 15;21(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10801-0.
6
User Intentions to Use ChatGPT for Self-Diagnosis and Health-Related Purposes: Cross-sectional Survey Study.用户使用ChatGPT进行自我诊断及与健康相关目的的意图:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 May 17;10:e47564. doi: 10.2196/47564.
7
Investigating the Impact of User Trust on the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT: Survey Analysis.研究用户信任对 ChatGPT 采用和使用的影响:调查分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 14;25:e47184. doi: 10.2196/47184.
8
Online Health Information Seeking and Preventative Health Actions: Cross-Generational Online Survey Study.在线健康信息搜索与预防性健康行动:跨代在线调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 11;26:e48977. doi: 10.2196/48977.
9
"Doctor ChatGPT, Can You Help Me?" The Patient's Perspective: Cross-Sectional Study.“医生 ChatGPT,你能帮我吗?”患者视角:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 1;26:e58831. doi: 10.2196/58831.
10
Health Information Seeking From an Intelligent Web-Based Symptom Checker: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study.健康信息智能网络症状检查器搜索:横断面问卷调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 19;24(8):e36322. doi: 10.2196/36322.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy, Clarity, and Comprehensiveness of ChatGPT Outputs for Commonly Asked Questions About Living Kidney Donation.ChatGPT对常见活体肾捐赠问题的回答的准确性、清晰度和全面性。
Clin Transplant. 2025 Sep;39(9):e70303. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70303.
2
Evaluating User Interactions and Adoption Patterns of Generative AI in Health Care Occupations Using Claude: Cross-Sectional Study.使用Claude评估医疗保健职业中生成式人工智能的用户交互和采用模式:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 30;27:e73918. doi: 10.2196/73918.
3
Association of Primary Care Access with Health-Related ChatGPT Use: A National Cross-Sectional Survey.初级医疗服务可及性与健康相关的ChatGPT使用情况的关联:一项全国性横断面调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb 10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09406-9.

本文引用的文献

1
A Bibliometric Analysis of the Rise of ChatGPT in Medical Research.ChatGPT 在医学研究中的崛起的文献计量分析。
Med Sci (Basel). 2023 Sep 17;11(3):61. doi: 10.3390/medsci11030061.
2
Comparison of Ophthalmologist and Large Language Model Chatbot Responses to Online Patient Eye Care Questions.眼科医生与大型语言模型聊天机器人对在线患者眼部护理问题的回复比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2330320. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30320.
3
The digital divide: Racial disparities in adoption and utilization of health information technology among patients with lymphoid cancers.数字鸿沟:淋巴癌患者在健康信息技术采用和使用方面的种族差异。
Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(18):19013-19020. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6454. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
4
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-powered Large Language Models Application in Disseminating Appropriate and Readable Health Information in Urology.评估人工智能驱动的大型语言模型在泌尿外科传播恰当且易读的健康信息方面的有效性。
J Urol. 2023 Oct;210(4):688-694. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003615. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
5
User Intentions to Use ChatGPT for Self-Diagnosis and Health-Related Purposes: Cross-sectional Survey Study.用户使用ChatGPT进行自我诊断及与健康相关目的的意图:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 May 17;10:e47564. doi: 10.2196/47564.
6
Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum.比较医生和人工智能聊天机器人对发布在公共社交媒体论坛上的患者问题的回复。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jun 1;183(6):589-596. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1838.
7
Assessing the Accuracy of Responses by the Language Model ChatGPT to Questions Regarding Bariatric Surgery.评估语言模型 ChatGPT 对肥胖症手术相关问题回答的准确性。
Obes Surg. 2023 Jun;33(6):1790-1796. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06603-5. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
8
Comparison Between ChatGPT and Google Search as Sources of Postoperative Patient Instructions.ChatGPT与谷歌搜索作为术后患者指导信息来源的比较
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun 1;149(6):556-558. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0704.
9
AI-Generated Medical Advice-GPT and Beyond.人工智能生成的医学建议——GPT及其他。
JAMA. 2023 Apr 25;329(16):1349-1350. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.5321.
10
On the cusp: Considering the impact of artificial intelligence language models in healthcare.处于临界点:思考人工智能语言模型在医疗保健领域的影响。
Med. 2023 Mar 10;4(3):139-140. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2023.02.008.