Masci Maurizio, Caproni Roberto, Nevigato Teresina
Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Rome, Italy.
Methods Protoc. 2024 May 2;7(3):38. doi: 10.3390/mps7030038.
The European Union's recent decision to renew the authorization for the use of glyphosate until 15 December 2033 has stimulated scientific discussion all around the world regarding its toxicity or otherwise for humans. Glyphosate is a chemical of which millions of tons have been used in the last 50 years worldwide to dry out weeds in cultivated fields and greenhouses and on roadsides. Concern has been raised in many areas about its possible presence in the food chain and its consequent adverse effects on health. Both aspects that argue in favor of toxicity and those that instead may indicate limited toxicity of glyphosate are discussed here. The widespread debate that has been generated requires further investigations and field measurements to understand glyphosate's fate once dispersed in the environment and its concentration in the food chain. Hence, there is a need for validated analytical methods that are available to analysts in the field. In the present review, methods for the analytical determination of glyphosate and its main metabolite, AMPA, are discussed, with a specific focus on chromatographic techniques applied to cereal products. The experimental procedures are explained in detail, including the cleanup, derivatization, and instrumental conditions, to give the laboratories involved enough information to proceed with the implementation of this line of analysis. The prevalent chromatographic methods used are LC-MS/MS, GC-MS/SIM, and GC-MS/MS, but sufficient indications are also given to those laboratories that wish to use the better performing high-resolution MS or the simpler HPLC-FLD, HPLC-UV, GC-NPD, and GC-FPD techniques for screening purposes. The concentrations of glyphosate from the literature measured in wheat, corn, barley, rye, oats, soybean, and cereal-based foods are reported, together with its regulatory status in various parts of the world and its accumulation mechanism. As for its accumulation in cereals, the available data show that glyphosate tends to accumulate more in wholemeal flours than in refined ones, that its concentration in the product strictly depends on the treatment period (the closer it is to the time of harvesting, the higher the concentration), and that in cold climates, the herbicide tends to persist in the soil for a long time.
欧盟最近决定将草甘膦的使用授权延长至2033年12月15日,这引发了全球范围内关于其对人类毒性与否的科学讨论。草甘膦是一种化学品,在过去50年里,全球已使用了数百万吨,用于农田、温室和路边除草。许多地区对其可能存在于食物链中以及对健康的后续不利影响表示担忧。本文讨论了支持草甘膦毒性的观点以及可能表明其毒性有限的观点。这场广泛的辩论需要进一步的调查和实地测量,以了解草甘膦一旦散布在环境中的归宿及其在食物链中的浓度。因此,需要有可供现场分析人员使用的经过验证的分析方法。在本综述中,讨论了草甘膦及其主要代谢物氨甲基膦酸(AMPA)的分析测定方法,特别关注应用于谷物产品的色谱技术。详细解释了实验步骤,包括净化、衍生化和仪器条件,以便相关实验室获得足够的信息来开展这一系列分析。常用的色谱方法是液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)、气相色谱-选择离子监测(GC-MS/SIM)和气相色谱-串联质谱(GC-MS/MS),但对于那些希望使用性能更好的高分辨率质谱或更简单的高效液相色谱-荧光检测(HPLC-FLD)、高效液相色谱-紫外检测(HPLC-UV)、气相色谱-氮磷检测(GC-NPD)和气相色谱-火焰光度检测(GC-FPD)技术进行筛查的实验室,也提供了充分的指导。报告了文献中测定的小麦、玉米、大麦、黑麦、燕麦、大豆和谷物类食品中的草甘膦浓度,以及其在世界不同地区的监管状况及其积累机制。至于其在谷物中的积累,现有数据表明,草甘膦在全麦粉中的积累往往比在精制面粉中更多,其在产品中的浓度严格取决于处理时期(离收获时间越近,浓度越高),并且在寒冷气候下,除草剂往往会在土壤中长期残留。