Suppr超能文献

特邀评论:流行病学研究中的种族、族裔与种族主义——来自公共卫生批判种族实践(PHCRP)的视角

Invited commentary: race, ethnicity, and racism in epidemiologic research-perspectives from Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP).

作者信息

Ford Chandra L, Pirtle Whitney N L

机构信息

Departments of Behavioral, Social & Health Education Sciences and African American Studies, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Departments of Sociology and Public Health, University of California, Merced, CA, United States.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Apr 8;194(4):927-935. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae064.

Abstract

In 2023, Martinez et al (Am J Epidemiol. 2023;192(3):483-496) examined trends in the inclusion, conceptualization, operationalization, and analysis of race and ethnicity among studies published in US epidemiology journals. Based on a random sample of articles (n = 1050) published from 1995-2018, the authors describe the treatment of race, ethnicity, and ethnorace in the analytic sample (n = 414, 39% of baseline sample) over time. The review supplies stark evidence of the routine omission and variability of measures of race and ethnicity in epidemiologic research. Between 32% and 19% of studies in each time stratum lacked race data; 61%-34% lacked ethnicity data. Informed by public health critical race praxis (PHCRP), this commentary discusses the implications of 4 problems the findings suggest pervade epidemiology: (1) a general lack of clarity about what race and ethnicity are; (2) the limited use of critical race or other theory; (3) an ironic lack of rigor in measuring race and ethnicity; and (4) the ordinariness of racism and White supremacy in epidemiology. The identified practices reflect neither current publication guidelines nor the state of the knowledge on race, ethnicity and racism; therefore, we conclude by offering recommendations to move epidemiology toward more rigorous research in an increasingly diverse society.

摘要

2023年,马丁内斯等人(《美国流行病学杂志》。2023年;192(3):483 - 496)研究了美国流行病学杂志上发表的研究中种族和族裔的纳入、概念化、操作化及分析趋势。基于1995 - 2018年发表文章的随机样本(n = 1050),作者描述了分析样本(n = 414,占基线样本的39%)中种族、族裔和民族种族随时间的处理情况。该综述提供了有力证据,证明流行病学研究中种族和族裔测量方法存在常规性遗漏和变异性。每个时间层中32%至19%的研究缺乏种族数据;61% - 34%缺乏族裔数据。基于公共卫生批判种族实践(PHCRP),本评论讨论了研究结果表明在流行病学中普遍存在的4个问题的影响:(1)对种族和族裔是什么普遍缺乏清晰认识;(2)批判种族理论或其他理论的使用有限;(3)在测量种族和族裔方面具有讽刺意味地缺乏严谨性;(4)流行病学中种族主义和白人至上主义的普遍性。所确定的做法既不符合当前的出版指南,也不符合关于种族、族裔和种族主义的知识现状;因此,我们最后提出建议,以使流行病学在日益多样化的社会中朝着更严谨的研究方向发展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验