Duffy R J, Liles B Z
J Speech Hear Disord. 1979 May;44(2):156-68. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4402.156.
On March 21, 1870, Dr. D.C. Finkelnburg addressed the Society of the Lower Rhine in Bonn on the popular topic of aphasia. He challenged the prevailing view that aphasia was a disorder of speech only and the emphasis that had been given to the issue of cerebral localization. The disorder, he pointed out, not only extended beyond the speech modality to include verbal comprehension, reading, and writing but also included many extraverbal disturbances of symbolic usage. In support of his argument, he presented five detailed case studies of aphasics (two with autopsy data) who demonstrated a variety of verbal and extraverbal deficits. Because the term aphasia referred specifically to speech disturbance and inadequately signified the full extent of the disorder, Finkelnburg proposed the more generic term asymbolia as a more accurate representation of the nature of the disorder. This translation makes available a previously inaccessible but historically important and still viable contribution to the study of the nature of aphasia.
1870年3月21日,D.C.芬克恩伯格博士在波恩的莱茵河下游协会发表了关于失语症这一热门话题的演讲。他对当时盛行的观点提出了挑战,该观点认为失语症仅仅是一种言语障碍,并且过度强调了大脑定位问题。他指出,这种障碍不仅超出了言语范畴,还包括言语理解、阅读和写作,而且还包括许多符号使用方面的非言语障碍。为了支持自己的论点,他展示了五个失语症患者的详细案例研究(其中两个有尸检数据),这些案例展现了各种言语和非言语缺陷。由于“失语症”一词专门指言语障碍,不足以涵盖该障碍的全部范围,芬克恩伯格提出了更通用的术语“失用症”,以更准确地表述该障碍的本质。此译文为失语症本质研究提供了一份此前难以获取但具有历史重要性且仍具可行性的贡献。