Pritchard Emma, Vihta Karina-Doris, Eyre David W, Hopkins Susan, Peto Tim E A, Matthews Philippa C, Stoesser Nicole, Studley Ruth, Rourke Emma, Diamond Ian, Pouwels Koen B, Walker Ann Sarah, Infection Survey Team Covid-
Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom.
NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare-Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 2;193(12):1848-1860. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae091.
Detecting and quantifying changes in the growth rates of infectious diseases is vital to informing public health strategy and can inform policymakers' rationale for implementing or continuing interventions aimed at reducing their impact. Substantial changes in SARS-CoV-2 prevalence with the emergence of variants have provided an opportunity to investigate different methods for doing this. We collected polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results from all participants in the United Kingdom's COVID-19 Infection Survey between August 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022. Change points for growth rates were identified using iterative sequential regression (ISR) and second derivatives of generalized additive models (GAMs). Consistency between methods and timeliness of detection were compared. Of 8 799 079 study visits, 147 278 (1.7%) were PCR-positive. Change points associated with the emergence of major variants were estimated to occur a median of 4 days earlier (IQR, 0-8) when using GAMs versus ISR. When estimating recent change points using successive data periods, 4 change points (4/96) identified by GAMs were not found when adding later data or by ISR. Change points were detected 3-5 weeks after they occurred under both methods but could be detected earlier within specific subgroups. Change points in growth rates of SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in near real time using ISR and second derivatives of GAMs. To increase certainty about changes in epidemic trajectories, both methods could be used in parallel.
检测和量化传染病增长率的变化对于为公共卫生战略提供信息至关重要,并且可以为政策制定者实施或继续旨在减少其影响的干预措施提供理论依据。随着新冠病毒变异株的出现,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)流行率的显著变化为研究实现这一目标的不同方法提供了契机。我们收集了2020年8月1日至2022年6月30日期间英国新冠病毒感染调查所有参与者的聚合酶链反应(PCR)结果。使用迭代序贯回归(ISR)和广义相加模型(GAM)的二阶导数确定增长率的变化点。比较了两种方法之间的一致性和检测的及时性。在8799079次研究访视中,147278次(1.7%)PCR检测呈阳性。与主要变异株出现相关的变化点,使用GAM估计比使用ISR提前出现的中位数为4天(四分位间距,0 - 8天)。在使用连续数据期估计近期变化点时,GAM识别出的4个变化点(4/96)在添加后续数据或使用ISR时未被发现。两种方法均在变化点出现后3 - 5周检测到,但在特定亚组中可以更早检测到。使用ISR和GAM的二阶导数可以近乎实时地检测SARS-CoV-2增长率的变化点。为了提高对疫情轨迹变化的确定性,可以并行使用这两种方法。