Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
Pain. 2024 Nov 1;165(11):2595-2605. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003271. Epub 2024 May 28.
During adolescence major shifts in sleep and circadian systems occur with a notable circadian phase delay. Yet, the circadian influence on pain during early adolescence is largely unknown. Using 2 years of data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study, we investigated the impact of chronotype on pain incidence, moderate-to-severe pain, and multiregion pain 1 year later in U.S. adolescents. Based on the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire, chronotype was calculated as the midpoint between sleep onset and offset on free days, corrected for sleep debt over the week. Adolescents reported pain presence over the past month, and if present, rated pain intensity (0-10 numerical rating scale; ≥ 4 defined as moderate-to-severe pain) and body site locations (Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry Body Map; ≥2 regions defined as multiregion pain). Three-level random intercept logistic regression models were specified for each pain outcome, adjusting for baseline sociodemographic and developmental characteristics. Among 5991 initially pain-free adolescents (mean age 12.0 years, SD 0.7), the mean chronotype was 3:59 am (SD 97 minutes), and the 1-year incidence of pain, moderate-to-severe pain, and multiregion pain was 24.4%, 15.2%, and 13.5%, respectively. Each hour later chronotype at baseline was associated with higher odds of developing any pain (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01, 1.11), moderate-to-severe pain (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.05-1.17), and multiregion pain (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.02-1.14) during 1-year follow-up. In this diverse U.S. adolescent sample, later chronotype predicted higher incidence of new-onset pain.
在青少年时期,睡眠和昼夜节律系统会发生重大变化,昼夜节律相位明显延迟。然而,青少年早期疼痛的昼夜节律影响在很大程度上尚不清楚。本研究使用来自青少年大脑认知发展研究的 2 年数据,调查了美国青少年在 1 年后的自由日中,生物钟类型对疼痛发生率、中重度疼痛和多区域疼痛的影响。基于慕尼黑生物钟问卷,生物钟类型通过计算睡眠开始和结束的中点来计算,校正一周内的睡眠债务。青少年报告过去一个月的疼痛存在情况,如果存在,则评估疼痛强度(0-10 数字评分量表;≥4 定义为中重度疼痛)和身体部位(合作健康结果信息登记身体图;≥2 个区域定义为多区域疼痛)。对于每个疼痛结果,都指定了三级随机截距逻辑回归模型,调整了基线社会人口统计学和发育特征。在最初无疼痛的 5991 名青少年中(平均年龄 12.0 岁,标准差 0.7),平均生物钟类型为 3:59 am(标准差 97 分钟),1 年的疼痛、中重度疼痛和多区域疼痛发生率分别为 24.4%、15.2%和 13.5%。基线时每小时延迟的生物钟类型与出现任何疼痛(优势比[OR] = 1.06,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.01,1.11)、中重度疼痛(OR = 1.10,95% CI = 1.05-1.17)和多区域疼痛(OR = 1.08,95% CI = 1.02-1.14)的几率更高相关。在这个多样化的美国青少年样本中,较晚的生物钟类型预示着新发病例疼痛的发生率更高。