A tailored approach in cholesteatoma surgery.

PURPOSE

In recent years, new techniques have been added to cholesteatoma surgery, and established microsurgical approaches are being reconsidered. This study aims to present the importance of individualized decision-making for the selection of an intact canal wall (CWU) or canal wall down (CWD) surgical procedure for each patient.

METHODS

Using the "ChOLE" classification we categorized 264 operations retrospectively. 162 CWU and 102 CWD surgeries were performed. We focus to determine why a CWD procedure was chosen quite frequently despite some low-stage cases. Furthermore, we evaluated recidivism and hearing outcomes.

RESULTS

Smaller cholesteatomas (Ch-stage 1a, 1b & 2a) were found in 182 patients (70%), ossicular chain status feasible for straightforward reconstruction (O-stage 0, 1 & 2) was present in 186 patients (70%), minor complications due to the cholesteatoma (L-stage 1) were infrequent with 28 cases (11%) and a well-pneumatized mastoid was found in 144 cases (55%). Recidivism rates were low (7%) without any difference in both groups and a mean follow-up time of 4 years and 8 months. In primary surgeries there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in postoperative mean air-bone gap (ABG) between CWU (17dB) and CWD (27dB).

CONCLUSION

The main goals of cholesteatoma surgery remain the avoidance of recidivism and optimal hearing rehabilitation. We recommend a tailored approach in the treatment of cholesteatomas and not a dogmatic one. Surgeons should not hesitate to perform a CWD procedure if required. Performed correctly it results in a dry ear and CWD surgery should remain in the skill set of the otologic surgeon.