Bschor Tom, Nagel Lea, Unger Josephine, Schwarzer Guido, Baethge Christopher
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Government Commission for Modern and Needs-Based Hospital Care, Berlin, Germany.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 1;81(8):757-768. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.0994.
Placebo is the only substance systematically evaluated across common psychiatric diagnoses, but comprehensive cross-diagnostic comparisons are lacking.
To compare changes in placebo groups in recent high-quality randomized clinical trials (RCTs) across a broad spectrum of psychiatric disorders in adult patients.
MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were systematically searched in March 2022 for the latest systematic reviews meeting predetermined high-quality criteria for 9 major psychiatric diagnoses.
Using these reviews, the top 10 highest-quality (ie, lowest risk of bias, according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool) and most recent placebo-controlled RCTs per diagnosis (totaling 90 RCTs) were selected, adhering to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Following the Cochrane Handbook, 2 authors independently carried out the study search, selection, and data extraction. Cross-diagnosis comparisons were based on standardized pre-post effect sizes (mean change divided by its SD) for each placebo group. This study is reported following the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guideline.
The primary outcome, pooled pre-post placebo effect sizes (dav) with 95% CIs per diagnosis, was determined using random-effects meta-analyses. A Q test assessed statistical significance of differences across diagnoses. Heterogeneity and small-study effects were evaluated as appropriate.
A total of 90 RCTs with 9985 placebo-treated participants were included. Symptom severity improved with placebo in all diagnoses. Pooled pre-post placebo effect sizes differed across diagnoses (Q = 88.5; df = 8; P < .001), with major depressive disorder (dav = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.24-1.56) and generalized anxiety disorder (dav = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.06-1.41) exhibiting the largest dav. Panic disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, social phobia, and mania showed dav between 0.68 and 0.92, followed by OCD (dav = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51-0.78) and schizophrenia (dav = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.76).
This systematic review and meta-analysis found that symptom improvement with placebo treatment was substantial in all conditions but varied across the 9 included diagnoses. These findings may help in assessing the necessity and ethical justification of placebo controls, in evaluating treatment effects in uncontrolled studies, and in guiding patients in treatment decisions. These findings likely encompass the true placebo effect, natural disease course, and nonspecific effects.
安慰剂是唯一在常见精神科诊断中得到系统评估的物质,但缺乏全面的跨诊断比较。
比较成年患者近期高质量随机临床试验(RCT)中安慰剂组在广泛精神障碍中的变化。
2022年3月系统检索了MEDLINE和Cochrane系统评价数据库,以获取符合预定高质量标准的9种主要精神科诊断的最新系统评价。
利用这些评价,根据每个诊断选择了前10项质量最高(即根据Cochrane偏倚风险工具偏倚风险最低)且最新的安慰剂对照RCT(共90项RCT),并遵循预定的纳入和排除标准。
按照Cochrane手册,两名作者独立进行研究检索、选择和数据提取。跨诊断比较基于每个安慰剂组的标准化前后效应量(平均变化除以其标准差)。本研究按照流行病学观察性研究的Meta分析(MOOSE)报告指南进行报告。
主要结局为使用随机效应Meta分析确定的每个诊断的汇总前后安慰剂效应量(dav)及其95%置信区间。Q检验评估各诊断间差异的统计学显著性。酌情评估异质性和小研究效应。
共纳入90项RCT,9985名接受安慰剂治疗的参与者。在所有诊断中,安慰剂治疗后症状严重程度均有所改善。汇总的前后安慰剂效应量在各诊断间存在差异(Q = 88.5;自由度 = 8;P < 0.001),其中重度抑郁症(dav = 1.40;95%置信区间,1.24 - 1.56)和广泛性焦虑症(dav = 1.23;95%置信区间,1.06 - 1.41)的dav最大。惊恐障碍、注意力缺陷/多动障碍、创伤后应激障碍、社交恐惧症和躁狂症的dav在0.68至0.92之间,其次是强迫症(dav = 0.65;95%置信区间,0.51 - 0.78)和精神分裂症(dav = 0.59;95%置信区间,0.41 - 0.76)。
这项系统评价和Meta分析发现,安慰剂治疗在所有情况下均能显著改善症状,但在所纳入的9种诊断中存在差异。这些发现可能有助于评估安慰剂对照的必要性和伦理合理性,评估非对照研究中的治疗效果,并指导患者做出治疗决策。这些发现可能涵盖了真正的安慰剂效应、自然病程和非特异性效应。