• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of rapid diagnostic test kits for detection of Treponema pallidum antibody.梅毒螺旋体抗体检测试剂盒的评价。
PLoS One. 2024 May 29;19(5):e0303477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303477. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison and evaluation of Abbott chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay and ChIVD light-initiated chemiluminescent assay in the detection of Treponema pallidum antibody.雅培化学发光微粒子免疫分析与 ChIVD 光启动化学发光检测梅毒螺旋体抗体的比较与评价。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Jul;34(7):e23275. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23275. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
3
Consistency Between Treponema pallidum Particle Agglutination Assay and Architect Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay and Characterization of Inconsistent Samples.梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集试验与Architect化学发光微粒子免疫分析之间的一致性及不一致样本的特征分析
J Clin Lab Anal. 2015 Jul;29(4):281-4. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21765. Epub 2014 May 19.
4
Evaluation of three automated Treponema pallidum antibody assays for syphilis screening.用于梅毒筛查的三种梅毒螺旋体抗体自动化检测方法的评估
J Infect Chemother. 2018 Nov;24(11):887-891. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
5
Usefulness of Automated Latex Turbidimetric Rapid Plasma Reagin Test for Diagnosis and Evaluation of Treatment Response in Syphilis in Comparison with Manual Card Test: a Prospective Cohort Study.自动化胶乳凝集快速血浆反应素试验在梅毒诊断和疗效评估中的应用:与手动卡片试验的前瞻性队列研究比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Oct 25;56(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01003-18. Print 2018 Nov.
6
Screening for antibodies against Treponema pallidum with chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay: analysis of discordant serology results and clinical characterization.采用化学发光微粒子免疫分析法筛查梅毒螺旋体抗体:血清学结果不一致分析及临床特征
Ann Clin Biochem. 2016 Sep;53(Pt 5):588-92. doi: 10.1177/0004563215623806. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
7
Comparison of performance of two Treponema pallidum automated chemiluminescent immunoassays in blood donors.两种梅毒螺旋体自动化化学发光免疫分析方法在献血者中的性能比较。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2016;48(6):483-7. doi: 10.3109/23744235.2016.1142674. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
8
Comparison of an automated rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test with the conventional RPR card test in syphilis testing.比较自动化快速血浆反应素(RPR)试验与传统 RPR 卡片试验在梅毒检测中的应用。
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 31;4(12):e005664. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005664.
9
Evaluation of a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay for determination of Treponema pallidum antibodies.用于检测梅毒螺旋体抗体的化学发光微粒子免疫分析方法的评估
Clin Lab. 2007;53(9-12):597-603.
10
Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria.尼日利亚基于诊所的评估研究:一种双重快速检测用于筛查孕妇艾滋病毒和梅毒的诊断准确性。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 10;13(7):e0198698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198698. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel colorimetric immunosensor based on silk cocoon membrane-integrated ELISA for treponemal antibody detection.一种基于蚕茧膜集成酶联免疫吸附测定法的新型比色免疫传感器用于梅毒螺旋体抗体检测。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Sep 2;13(9):e0009425. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00094-25. Epub 2025 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for Syphilis Infection in Nonpregnant Adolescents and Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Reaffirmation Recommendation Statement.梅毒感染筛查在非妊娠青少年和成年人中的应用:美国预防服务工作组重新确认推荐声明。
JAMA. 2022 Sep 27;328(12):1243-1249. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.15322.
2
The Traditional or Reverse Algorithm for Diagnosis of Syphilis: Pros and Cons.梅毒诊断的传统或反向算法:利弊。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 24;71(Suppl 1):S43-S51. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa307.
3
Evaluate performance of the Abbott chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay assay for detection of syphilis infection in Chinese blood donors.评估雅培化学发光微粒子免疫分析检测试剂盒在中国献血者梅毒感染检测中的性能。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Jan;34(1):e23033. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23033. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
4
Frequency and Characteristics of Biological False-Positive Test Results for Syphilis Reported in Florida and New York City, USA, 2013 to 2017.2013 年至 2017 年美国佛罗里达州和纽约市报告的梅毒生物学假阳性检测结果的频率和特征。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Oct 23;57(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00898-19. Print 2019 Nov.
5
Comparative Performance of the Reverse Algorithm Using Architect Syphilis TP Versus the Traditional Algorithm Using Rapid Plasma Reagin in Florida's Public Health Testing Population.使用 Architect 梅毒 TP 反向算法与使用传统快速血浆反应素在佛罗里达州公共卫生检测人群中的比较性能。
Ann Lab Med. 2019 Jul;39(4):396-399. doi: 10.3343/alm.2019.39.4.396.
6
Evaluation of the Elecsys Syphilis electrochemiluminescence immunoassay as a first-line screening test in the reverse algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis.评价 Elecsys 梅毒电化学发光免疫分析法作为梅毒血清学诊断反向算法中的一线筛查试验。
Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Mar;80:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.12.016. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
7
Performance of the Syphilis Health Check in Clinic and Laboratory-Based Settings.梅毒健康检查在诊所和实验室环境中的表现。
Sex Transm Dis. 2019 Apr;46(4):250-253. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000974.
8
Evaluation of seven rapid tests for syphilis available in Brazil using defibrinated plasma panels.使用去纤维蛋白血浆样本对巴西现有的七种梅毒快速检测方法进行评估。
Sex Transm Infect. 2017 Dec;93(S4):S46-S50. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053177.
9
The analyzation and clinical evaluation of ECLIA and CMIA in the detection of Treponema pallidum.电化学发光免疫分析(ECLIA)和化学发光微粒子免疫分析(CMIA)检测梅毒螺旋体的分析及临床评价
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(24):e7139. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007139.
10
Improving the screening of blood donors with syphilis rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and rapid plasma reagin (RPR) in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)中,利用梅毒快速诊断检测(RDT)和快速血浆反应素试验(RPR)改进献血者筛查。
Transfus Med. 2017 Feb;27(1):52-59. doi: 10.1111/tme.12363. Epub 2016 Oct 10.

梅毒螺旋体抗体检测试剂盒的评价。

Evaluation of rapid diagnostic test kits for detection of Treponema pallidum antibody.

机构信息

Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

Thammasat University Research Unit in Medical Technology and Precision Medicine Innovation, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 May 29;19(5):e0303477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303477. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0303477
PMID:38809884
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11135684/
Abstract

Rapid syphilis testing plays a crucial role in global health strategies, addressing the urgent need for prompt and accurate diagnostics, especially in settings with limited resources. Despite their practical utility, these tests often lack thorough validation, leading to concerns about their efficacy and reliability. This study aims to evaluate two prototypes of the Onsite Syphilis Ab Combo Rapid Test (Fd and Ff) and compare their performance with the established chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) method. Employing a reverse algorithm approach, the study analyzed 450 serum samples, including those from syphilis patients, healthy individuals, and cases with potential cross-reactions. Results of the rapid test kit were then correlated with CMIA findings, RPR, and TPPA titers. The results showed that prototype Fd exhibited a sensitivity of 100.0%, specificity of 98.8%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 8.4%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 100.00% and accuracy of 98.8%. Similarly, prototype Ff exhibited sensitivity of 100.0%, but with a slightly higher specificity of 99.6%, PPV of 21.5%, NPV of 100.0% and accuracy of 99.6%. Moreover, both prototypes Fd and Ff of the Onsite Syphilis Ab Combo Rapid Test demonstrated significant efficacy diagnostic tool, offering clear and straightforward interpretation for clinicians in varied CMIA, RPR and TPPA titer scenarios. The Onsite Syphilis Ab Combo Rapid Test prototypes, Fd and Ff, demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, comparable to CMIA methods. The effectiveness highlights their suitability for syphilis screening, particularly in non-laboratory settings or situations requiring immediate results. The validation of these prototypes supports their integration into current syphilis diagnostic algorithms, potentially contributing to improved public health outcomes.

摘要

快速梅毒检测在全球卫生策略中发挥着至关重要的作用,满足了对快速准确诊断的迫切需求,尤其是在资源有限的环境中。尽管这些检测具有实际效用,但它们通常缺乏全面的验证,导致对其疗效和可靠性产生担忧。本研究旨在评估两种 Onsite Syphilis Ab Combo Rapid Test(Fd 和 Ff)原型的性能,并将其与既定的化学发光微粒子免疫分析(CMIA)方法进行比较。本研究采用反向算法方法,分析了 450 份血清样本,包括梅毒患者、健康个体和潜在交叉反应病例。然后将快速检测试剂盒的结果与 CMIA 发现、RPR 和 TPPA 滴度相关联。研究结果表明,原型 Fd 的灵敏度为 100.0%,特异性为 98.8%,阳性预测值(PPV)为 8.4%,阴性预测值(NPV)为 100.00%,准确率为 98.8%。同样,原型 Ff 的灵敏度为 100.0%,但特异性略高,为 99.6%,PPV 为 21.5%,NPV 为 100.0%,准确率为 99.6%。此外,Onsite Syphilis Ab Combo Rapid Test 的原型 Fd 和 Ff 均表现出显著的疗效诊断工具,为临床医生在不同的 CMIA、RPR 和 TPPA 滴度情况下提供了清晰简洁的解释。Onsite Syphilis Ab Combo Rapid Test 的原型 Fd 和 Ff 表现出高灵敏度和特异性,与 CMIA 方法相当。这些结果突出了它们在梅毒筛查中的适用性,特别是在非实验室环境或需要即时结果的情况下。这些原型的验证支持将其纳入当前的梅毒诊断算法,有可能改善公共卫生结果。