Brooks Cindy Faith, Lund Susi, Kryl David, Lloyd Jones Sian, Myall Michelle
National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Front Health Serv. 2024 May 15;4:1356961. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1356961. eCollection 2024.
Implementing new innovations across the health and social care system is complex, involving many factors that in recent years have been compounded by Covid-19. While a plethora of implementation tools and frameworks are available, there are limitations in terms of their design and accessibility. Co-production is a valuable mechanism for developing tools that have utility and accessibility for those tasked with using them in health and social care organisations and there is growing acknowledgement of increasing the role of co-production in implementation science. This paper provides novel insight into co-production practices and relevance to implementation science by reporting findings from a study to co-produce a web-based implementation toolkit (WIT) that is accessible, usable and designed to support adaptive implementation across health and social care systems. Key themes relating to the process of co-production are outlined and the value of using co-production in implementation processes are discussed.
A web-based survey ( = 36) was conducted with a range of stakeholders across health and social care. Findings identified a need for WIT. Survey respondents were invited to express interest in becoming part of a co-production group and to take part in three online interactive workshops to co-produce WIT. Workshops took place with the group ( = 12) and focused on key developmental stages of WIT.
Online co-production workshops were integral to the development and refinement of WIT. Benefits of using this process identified three interrelated themes: (i) Co-designing key features of the toolkit, (ii) Co-producing a toolkit with utility for users across health and social care settings, (iii) Co-producing a toolkit to support the implementation journey. Our approach of undertaking co-production as a dialogic process enabled generation of these themes. To illuminate discussion of these themes we draw upon iterative co-development of the "active ingredients" of key components (e.g., interactive Implementation Wheel) and functions (e.g., interactive "pop-up" definitions of keyword) and features (e.g., case studies) of WIT.
Using a co-production approach with a range of end-users across health and social care systems, highlights the benefits of understanding implementation processes for users in these settings. User-centred design and processes for ensuring accessibility readily support the translation of implementation into rapidly changing health and social care systems to benefit outcomes for patients, their families, carers, service users and practitioners.
在卫生和社会护理系统中实施新的创新举措十分复杂,涉及诸多因素,近年来还因新冠疫情而更加复杂。虽然有大量的实施工具和框架可供使用,但在设计和可及性方面存在局限性。共同生产是开发对卫生和社会护理组织中负责使用这些工具的人员有用且易于获取的工具的一种宝贵机制,并且越来越多的人认识到应增强共同生产在实施科学中的作用。本文通过报告一项共同生产基于网络的实施工具包(WIT)的研究结果,提供了关于共同生产实践及其与实施科学相关性的新颖见解。概述了与共同生产过程相关的关键主题,并讨论了在实施过程中使用共同生产的价值。
对卫生和社会护理领域的一系列利益相关者进行了一项基于网络的调查(n = 36)。调查结果表明需要WIT。邀请参与调查的受访者表达加入共同生产小组的兴趣,并参加三个在线互动研讨会以共同生产WIT。研讨会与该小组(n = 12)一起进行,重点关注WIT的关键开发阶段。
在线共同生产研讨会对于WIT的开发和完善至关重要。使用此过程的好处确定了三个相互关联的主题:(i)共同设计工具包的关键特征,(ii)共同生产对卫生和社会护理环境中的用户有用的工具包,(iii)共同生产支持实施过程的工具包。我们将共同生产作为对话过程的方法促成了这些主题的产生。为了阐明对这些主题的讨论,我们借鉴了WIT关键组件(例如交互式实施轮)、功能(例如关键字的交互式“弹出式”定义)和特征(例如案例研究)“有效成分”的迭代共同开发。
在卫生和社会护理系统中与一系列最终用户采用共同生产方法,突出了了解这些环境中用户实施过程的好处。以用户为中心的设计和确保可及性的过程有助于将实施转化为快速变化的卫生和社会护理系统,从而使患者、其家人、护理人员、服务用户和从业者受益。