• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向实施利益相关者参与模型(I-STEM),以改善医疗保健服务。

Towards an Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) for improving health and social care services.

机构信息

Department of Social Work, Education, and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1997-2012. doi: 10.1111/hex.13808. Epub 2023 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13808
PMID:37403248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10485327/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The implementation science literature acknowledges a need for engagement of key stakeholders when designing, delivering and evaluating implementation work. To date, the literature reports minimal or focused stakeholder engagement, where stakeholders are engaged in either barrier identification and/or barrier prioritisation. This paper begins to answer calls from the literature for the development of tools and guidance to support comprehensive stakeholder engagement in implementation research and practice. The paper describes the systematic development of the Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) in the context of an international, large-scale empirical implementation study (ImpleMentAll) aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored implementation toolkit. The I-STEM is a sensitising tool that defines key considerations and activities for undertaking stakeholder engagement activities across an implementation process.

METHODS

In-depth, semistructured interviews and observations were conducted with implementers who were tailoring implementation strategies to integrate and embed internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) services in 12 routine mental health care organisations in nine countries in Europe and Australia. The analytical process was informed by principles of first- and third-generation Grounded Theory, including constant comparative method.

RESULTS

We conducted 55 interviews and observed 19 implementation-related activities (e.g., team meetings and technical support calls). The final outcome of our analysis is expressed in an initial version of the I-STEM, consisting of five interrelated concepts: engagement objectives, stakeholder mapping, engagement approaches, engagement qualities and engagement outcomes. Engagement objectives are goals that implementers plan to achieve by working with stakeholders in the implementation process. Stakeholder mapping involves identifying a range of organisations, groups or people who may be instrumental in achieving the engagement objectives. Engagement approaches define the type of work that is undertaken with stakeholders to achieve the engagement objectives. Engagement qualities define the logistics of the engagement approach. Lastly, every engagement activity may result in a range of engagement outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The I-STEM represents potential avenues for substantial stakeholder engagement activity across key phases of an implementation process. It provides a conceptual model for the planning, delivery, evaluation and reporting of stakeholder engagement activities. The I-STEM is nonprescriptive and highlights the importance of a flexible, iterative approach to stakeholder engagement. It is developmental and will require application and validation across a range of implementation activities.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patient contribution to ImpleMentAll trial was facilitated by GAMIAN-Europe at all stages-from grant development to dissemination. GAMIAN-Europe brings together a wide variety of patient representation organisations (local, regional and national) from almost all European countries. GAMIAN-Europe was involved in pilot testing the ItFits-toolkit and provided their views on the various aspects, including stakeholder engagement. Patients were also represented in the external advisory board providing support and advice on the design, conduct and interpretation of the wider project, including the development of the ItFits-toolkit.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03652883. Retrospectively registered on 29 August 2018.

摘要

背景

实施科学文献承认,在设计、提供和评估实施工作时需要让主要利益相关者参与进来。迄今为止,文献报告了很少或重点利益相关者的参与,其中利益相关者要么参与了障碍识别,要么参与了障碍优先级排序。本文开始回应文献中的呼吁,即开发工具和指南,以支持在实施研究和实践中全面参与利益相关者。本文描述了在一个国际大型实证实施研究(ImpleMentAll)背景下,系统开发实施-利益相关者参与模型(I-STEM)的情况,该研究旨在评估定制实施工具包的有效性。I-STEM 是一种敏感工具,它定义了在整个实施过程中开展利益相关者参与活动的关键考虑因素和活动。

方法

对实施者进行了深入的半结构化访谈和观察,这些实施者正在调整实施策略,以便将基于互联网的认知行为疗法(iCBT)服务整合和嵌入欧洲和澳大利亚的 12 个常规心理健康护理机构中。分析过程受到第一代和第三代扎根理论原则的指导,包括恒定性比较方法。

结果

我们进行了 55 次访谈并观察了 19 次与实施相关的活动(例如,团队会议和技术支持电话)。我们分析的最终结果以 I-STEM 的初始版本表示,该版本由五个相互关联的概念组成:参与目标、利益相关者映射、参与方法、参与质量和参与结果。参与目标是实施者计划通过与实施过程中的利益相关者合作来实现的目标。利益相关者映射涉及确定一系列可能对实现参与目标有帮助的组织、团体或人员。参与方法定义了与利益相关者一起完成以实现参与目标的工作类型。参与质量定义了参与方法的后勤工作。最后,每一次参与活动都可能产生一系列参与结果。

结论

I-STEM 代表了在实施过程的关键阶段进行实质性利益相关者参与活动的潜在途径。它为利益相关者参与活动的规划、交付、评估和报告提供了一个概念模型。I-STEM 不具有规定性,强调了对利益相关者参与采取灵活、迭代方法的重要性。它是发展性的,需要在各种实施活动中应用和验证。

患者或公众贡献

在 ImpleMentAll 试验的所有阶段,从资助开发到传播,GAMIAN-Europe 都促进了患者的参与。GAMIAN-Europe 将来自欧洲几乎所有国家的各种患者代表组织(地方、地区和国家)聚集在一起。GAMIAN-Europe 参与了 ItFits 工具包的试点测试,并就各个方面提供了他们的意见,包括利益相关者参与。患者还代表了外部顾问委员会,为设计、进行和解释更广泛的项目提供支持和建议,包括 ItFits 工具包的开发。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03652883。于 2018 年 8 月 29 日回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7c3/10485327/0ecc0b6a5ee7/HEX-26--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7c3/10485327/5cdf68af4a9a/HEX-26--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7c3/10485327/0ecc0b6a5ee7/HEX-26--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7c3/10485327/5cdf68af4a9a/HEX-26--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7c3/10485327/0ecc0b6a5ee7/HEX-26--g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Towards an Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) for improving health and social care services.迈向实施利益相关者参与模型(I-STEM),以改善医疗保健服务。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1997-2012. doi: 10.1111/hex.13808. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
2
How is tailored implementation undertaken using a self-guided toolkit? Qualitative study of the ItFits-toolkit in the ImpleMentAll project.如何使用自我指导工具包进行定制实施?ImpleMentAll 项目中 ItFits-工具包的定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2024 Jul 11;19(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01380-w.
3
Tailored implementation of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy in the multinational context of the ImpleMentAll project: a study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.个体化实施基于互联网的认知行为疗法在跨国多中心 ImpleMentAll 项目中的应用:一项基于阶梯式楔形的集群随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):893. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04686-4.
4
Effectiveness of Self-guided Tailored Implementation Strategies in Integrating and Embedding Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Routine Mental Health Care: Results of a Multicenter Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.自我指导的定制实施策略在常规精神卫生保健中整合和嵌入基于互联网的认知行为疗法的有效性:一项多中心阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 3;25:e41532. doi: 10.2196/41532.
5
Evaluation of a stakeholder advisory board for an adolescent mental health randomized clinical trial.青少年心理健康随机临床试验的利益相关者咨询委员会评估
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 28;9(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00425-6.
6
Introducing pulse oximetry in routine IMCI services in Bangladesh: A context-driven approach to influence policy and programme through stakeholder engagement.在孟加拉国的常规综合管理儿童疾病服务中引入脉搏血氧饱和度测定法:一种通过利益相关者参与来影响政策和项目的情境驱动方法。
J Glob Health. 2022 Apr 9;12:06001. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.06001. eCollection 2022.
7
How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement.如何让利益相关者参与研究:支持改进的设计原则。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 11;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0337-6.
8
9
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the social dimensions of AI integration in healthcare: a qualitative study of stakeholder views on challenges and opportunities.探索医疗保健领域人工智能集成的社会层面:对利益相关者关于挑战与机遇观点的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 27;15(6):e096208. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096208.
2
Leveraging the dynamic adaptation process to address LGBTQ+ health equity in New Mexico high schools.利用动态适应过程解决新墨西哥州高中的 LGBTQ+ 健康公平问题。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 3;5:1499508. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1499508. eCollection 2025.
3
Leveraging research steering committees for stakeholder engagement: a multifaceted strategy in Brazilian implementation projects.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Self-guided Tailored Implementation Strategies in Integrating and Embedding Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Routine Mental Health Care: Results of a Multicenter Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.自我指导的定制实施策略在常规精神卫生保健中整合和嵌入基于互联网的认知行为疗法的有效性:一项多中心阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 3;25:e41532. doi: 10.2196/41532.
2
Unraveling implementation context: the Basel Approach for coNtextual ANAlysis (BANANA) in implementation science and its application in the SMILe project.解析实施背景:实施科学中的巴塞尔情境分析方法(BANANA)及其在SMILe项目中的应用。
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Oct 1;3(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00354-7.
3
利用研究指导委员会促进利益相关者参与:巴西实施项目中的多方面策略。
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 May 31. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04081-x.
4
Advancing the selection of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks: a scoping review and the development of the SELECT-IT meta-framework.推进实施科学理论、模型和框架的选择:一项范围综述及SELECT-IT元框架的开发
Implement Sci. 2025 May 28;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01436-5.
5
Acceptability, feasibility, and factors affecting implementation of a gender-sensitivity training for HIV providers and staff in Uganda: a mixed methods, quasi-experimental controlled pilot trial.乌干达针对艾滋病毒服务提供者和工作人员的性别敏感性培训的可接受性、可行性及影响实施的因素:一项混合方法、准实验对照试点试验。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 24;25(1):1925. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23008-4.
6
Stakeholder engagement in healthcare research in India - A systematic review.印度医疗保健研究中的利益相关者参与——一项系统综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 May 15;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01341-9.
7
Developing an Integrated Service Planning Tool: Lessons Learnt from Planning the WSLHD Thoracic Oncology Program.开发综合服务规划工具:从规划西悉尼地方卫生区胸科肿瘤项目中吸取的经验教训。
Int J Integr Care. 2025 Apr 22;25(2):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.8976. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
8
Engagement in Hypertension and Diabetes Clinical Trials at Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Systematic Review.联邦合格健康中心参与高血压和糖尿病临床试验:一项系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255258. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5258.
9
Stakeholders' engagement for improved health outcomes: a research brief to design a tool for better communication and participation.利益相关者参与以改善健康结果:一份用于设计更好沟通与参与工具的研究简报。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 26;13:1536753. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1536753. eCollection 2025.
10
Systematic recording and discussion of intraoperative adverse events using ClassIntra: results of a qualitative context analysis before implementation.使用ClassIntra对术中不良事件进行系统记录和讨论:实施前的定性情境分析结果
Int J Qual Health Care. 2025 Apr 11;37(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf023.
Tailored implementation of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy in the multinational context of the ImpleMentAll project: a study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.
个体化实施基于互联网的认知行为疗法在跨国多中心 ImpleMentAll 项目中的应用:一项基于阶梯式楔形的集群随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):893. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04686-4.
4
The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research?共同生产的阴暗面:对于健康研究来说,其成本是否超过了收益?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 28;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3.
5
How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement.如何让利益相关者参与研究:支持改进的设计原则。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 11;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0337-6.
6
The science of stakeholder engagement in research: classification, implementation, and evaluation.研究中利益相关者参与的科学:分类、实施与评估。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):486-491. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0495-z.
7
Achieving Research Impact Through Co-creation in Community-Based Health Services: Literature Review and Case Study.通过社区卫生服务中的共同创造实现研究影响力:文献综述与案例研究
Milbank Q. 2016 Jun;94(2):392-429. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12197.
8
Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.针对实践决定因素的量身定制干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 29;2015(4):CD005470. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005470.pub3.
9
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks.理解实施理论、模型和框架。
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.
10
Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice.评估患者及利益相关者参与研究的情况:从理论到实践
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Mar;4(2):133-45. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.79.