• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinical Profile and Management Outcomes among Patients with Carotid-Cavernous Fistula.颈动脉海绵窦瘘患者的临床特征与治疗结果
Acta Med Philipp. 2024 May 15;58(8):76-91. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.6550. eCollection 2024.
2
Carotid cavernous sinus fistulas without superior ophthalmic vein enlargement.无眼上静脉扩张的颈内动脉海绵窦瘘
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 May-Jun;31(3):191-6. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000241.
3
Intermittent Manual Carotid Compression as a Treatment Option for Indirect Low Flow Carotid Cavernous Fistula.间歇性手动颈动脉压迫作为间接低流量颈动脉海绵窦瘘的治疗选择。
Orbit. 2023 Oct;42(5):502-509. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2022.2136203. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
4
[Carotid-cavernous fistula: clinical and pathological correlations].[颈动脉海绵窦瘘:临床与病理相关性]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2014 Jun;37(6):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 May 1.
5
Dural carotid cavernous sinus fistula: ocular characteristics, endovascular management and clinical outcome.硬脑膜海绵窦瘘:眼部特征、血管内治疗及临床结果
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Jun;91(6):852-8.
6
The evolution of endovascular treatment of carotid cavernous fistulas: a single-center experience.颈动脉海绵窦瘘的血管内治疗演变:单中心经验。
World Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;80(5):538-48. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.02.033. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
7
Carotid-cavernous fistula from the perspective of an ophthalmologist A Review.眼科医生视角下的颈动脉海绵窦瘘 综述
Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2020 Fall;1(Ahead of print):1-8. doi: 10.31348/2020/8.
8
Direct traumatic carotid cavernous fistula: angiographic classification and treatment strategies. Study of 172 cases.直接创伤性颈内动脉海绵窦瘘:血管造影分类及治疗策略。172例病例研究。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):461-75. doi: 10.15274/INR-2014-10020. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
9
Clinical improvement in indirect carotid cavernous fistulas treated endovascularly: A patient based review.经血管内治疗的间接颈动脉海绵窦瘘患者的临床改善:基于患者的回顾性研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;207:106750. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106750. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
10
Orbital Compartment Syndrome Secondary to Direct Carotid Cavernous Fistula After Carotid Cavernous Aneurysm Rupture: Case Report and Review of Literature.直接颈动脉海绵窦瘘致颈动脉海绵窦段动脉瘤破裂后眶隔综合征:病例报告及文献复习。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jan;133:409-412. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.037. Epub 2019 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuro-Ophthalmic Manifestations of Carotid Cavernous Fistulas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉海绵窦瘘的神经眼科表现:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 31;16(7):e65821. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65821. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical efficacy of endovascular treatment approach in patients with carotid cavernous fistula: A systematic review and meta-analysis.血管内治疗方法对海绵窦瘘患者的临床疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg X. 2023 Mar 29;19:100189. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100189. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Endovascular Management of Direct Carotid-Cavernous Fistula: Evolution of Cost Effective Sandwich Technique.颈内动脉海绵窦瘘的血管内治疗:经济高效三明治技术的演变
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2020 Oct;11(4):558-564. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714447. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
3
Patient reported long-term outcome after endovascular therapy of indirect dural carotid cavernous fistulas.患者报告了间接硬脑膜颈动脉海绵窦瘘血管内治疗的长期结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 10;15(4):e0231261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231261. eCollection 2020.
4
Posttraumatic cerebrovascular injuries in children. A systematic review.儿童创伤性脑血管损伤。系统评价。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2020 Feb;36(2):251-262. doi: 10.1007/s00381-019-04482-9. Epub 2020 Jan 4.
5
CT angiogram findings in carotid-cavernous fistulas: stratification of imaging features to help radiologists avoid misdiagnosis.颈动脉海绵窦瘘的CT血管造影表现:影像学特征分层以帮助放射科医生避免误诊。
Acta Radiol. 2020 Jul;61(7):945-952. doi: 10.1177/0284185119885119. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
6
Endovascular therapy of direct dural carotid cavernous fistulas - A therapy assessment study including long-term follow-up patient interviews.直接硬脑膜颈动脉海绵窦瘘的血管内治疗 - 包括长期随访患者访谈的治疗评估研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0223488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223488. eCollection 2019.
7
Internal carotid artery occlusion may affect long-term quality of life in patients with high-flow carotid cavernous fistulas.颈内动脉闭塞可能会影响高流量颈动脉海绵窦瘘患者的长期生活质量。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2020 Feb;26(1):83-89. doi: 10.1177/1591019919864668. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
8
Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment of Indirect Carotid Cavernous Fistulae: Superior Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of Transvenous Coiling Over Other Techniques.经静脉弹簧圈栓塞治疗间接颈动脉海绵窦瘘的长期疗效:优于其他技术的疗效、安全性和持久性。
Neurosurgery. 2019 Jul 1;85(1):E94-E100. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy486.
9
Carotid-cavernous fistula: current concepts in aetiology, investigation, and management.颈动脉海绵窦瘘:病因、检查和治疗的现代概念。
Eye (Lond). 2018 Feb;32(2):164-172. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.240. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
10
Bilateral carotid cavernous sinus fistula: a case report and review of the literature.双侧颈动脉海绵窦瘘:病例报告及文献复习。
J Neurol. 2018 Mar;265(3):453-459. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8657-y. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

颈动脉海绵窦瘘患者的临床特征与治疗结果

Clinical Profile and Management Outcomes among Patients with Carotid-Cavernous Fistula.

作者信息

Pe Yan Mary Rose, Sobrio Maria Clarissa S, Ranche Felice Katrina T

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila.

出版信息

Acta Med Philipp. 2024 May 15;58(8):76-91. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.6550. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.47895/amp.vi0.6550
PMID:38812769
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11132286/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A carotid-cavernous sinus fistula (CCF) is an abnormal communication between the internal carotid artery and/or the external carotid artery and the cavernous sinus. There is a paucity of information on the ophthalmic outcomes of endovascular treatment for CCF in the Philippines.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe the clinical experience of CCF in our institution in order to further our understanding of the disease. This study described the demographic profile, risk factors, and clinical features of patients with CCF, and compared the data of patients according to the type of CCF. The study discussed the changes in clinical features over time in CCF patients who chose not to undergo endovascular treatment. The study also discussed the clinical outcomes of CCF patients who underwent endovascular treatment and compared the clinical outcomes to CCF patients who did not undergo endovascular treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study design was performed using a medical record review of patients clinically diagnosed with CCF from January 2011 to June 2019.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty medical records of patients diagnosed with CCF were included. Based on angiographic findings, patients were grouped according to type of CCF, with 86 patients in Group 1 or Direct CCF, 23 patients in Group 2 or Indirect CCF, and 11 patients in Group 3 or Mixed type of CCF. The patients were also grouped according to treatment, with 109 patients in Group A, or patients who did not undergo endovascular treatment, and 11 patients in Group B, or patients who underwent endovascular treatment. There was a male predominance in CCF, most occurring in the age range of 26 to 35 years. Risk factors for CCF were trauma and hypertension. Clinical features included the presence of blurring of vision, proptosis, corkscrewing of conjunctival vessels, extraocular movement limitation, diplopia, audible bruit, elevated intraocular pressure, and pulsation. Findings on Computed Tomography scan included dilated superior ophthalmic vein, proptosis, and enlarged extraocular muscles. Direct CCF (Group 1) occurred mostly in males, with mean age of 39.1 years, and with trauma as the major risk factor. Indirect CCF (Group 2) occurred mostly in females, with mean age of 52.1 years, and with hypertension as the major risk factor. Regardless of the type of CCF, patients who did not undergo endovascular treatment can exhibit spontaneous improvement or worsening of clinical features. Patients who underwent endovascular treatment generally had favorable clinical outcomes, manifesting as either improvement or no worsening of features. There were minimal ophthalmic complications associated with treatment.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular treatment is safe and effective in the improvement of visual acuity, corkscrewing of conjunctival vessels, amount of proptosis, extraocular movement limitation, diplopia, and presence of audible bruit.

摘要

背景

颈动脉海绵窦瘘(CCF)是颈内动脉和/或颈外动脉与海绵窦之间的异常交通。菲律宾关于CCF血管内治疗的眼科预后的信息匮乏。

目的

本研究旨在描述我们机构中CCF的临床经验,以增进我们对该疾病的了解。本研究描述了CCF患者的人口统计学特征、危险因素和临床特征,并根据CCF的类型对患者数据进行了比较。该研究讨论了选择不接受血管内治疗的CCF患者临床特征随时间的变化。该研究还讨论了接受血管内治疗的CCF患者的临床结局,并将临床结局与未接受血管内治疗的CCF患者进行了比较。

方法

采用回顾性队列研究设计,对2011年1月至2019年6月临床诊断为CCF的患者进行病历回顾。

结果

纳入了120例诊断为CCF的患者病历。根据血管造影结果,患者按CCF类型分组,1组或直接CCF有86例患者,2组或间接CCF有23例患者,3组或混合型CCF有11例患者。患者也按治疗情况分组,A组有109例患者,即未接受血管内治疗的患者,B组有11例患者,即接受血管内治疗的患者。CCF以男性居多,大多发生在26至35岁年龄范围。CCF的危险因素是创伤和高血压。临床特征包括视力模糊、眼球突出、结膜血管螺旋状扭曲、眼球运动受限、复视、可闻及的杂音、眼压升高和搏动。计算机断层扫描结果包括眼上静脉扩张、眼球突出和眼外肌增大。直接CCF(1组)大多发生在男性,平均年龄39.1岁,主要危险因素是创伤。间接CCF(2组)大多发生在女性,平均年龄52.1岁,主要危险因素是高血压。无论CCF的类型如何,未接受血管内治疗的患者临床特征可自发改善或恶化。接受血管内治疗的患者一般临床结局良好,表现为特征改善或未恶化。治疗相关的眼科并发症极少。

结论

血管内治疗在改善视力、结膜血管螺旋状扭曲、眼球突出程度、眼球运动受限情况、复视及可闻及的杂音方面安全有效。