Suppr超能文献

同胞可用性、同胞排序与中国成年人的主观健康

Sibling Availability, Sibling Sorting, and Subjective Health Among Chinese Adults.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Aging Studies Institute, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

Department of Sociology and Criminology, Population Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

出版信息

Demography. 2024 Jun 1;61(3):797-827. doi: 10.1215/00703370-11376831.

Abstract

Despite rising numbers of only children in China, little is known about their family dynamics and well-being in adulthood-for example, how often they marry other only children and whether those in siblingless families have worse or better health than others. Theoretical expectations produce opposing predictions: siblings might provide social and emotional support and reduce parental caregiving pressures, but only children might receive more support from parents and grandparents. Using the 2010 China Family Panel Study, we examine marital sorting on Chinese adults' number of siblings and test whether sibling availability and sibling sorting are associated with subjective physical and mental health. Despite general perceptions that China has an exceedingly high prevalence of adults with no siblings that might produce very small families, results demonstrate a low prevalence of siblingless couples (i.e., both spouses are only children). Married adults with no siblings or siblings-in-law have better subjective physical health but similar levels of subjective mental health relative to their counterparts with siblings. The health advantages of siblingless marital unions are greater for rural and female adults. Declining sibling prevalence in China will shape future family demographic dynamics but appears less detrimental to population health than sometimes assumed.

摘要

尽管中国的独生子女数量不断增加,但人们对他们成年后的家庭动态和幸福感知之甚少,例如,他们与其他独生子女结婚的频率如何,以及无兄弟姐妹的家庭的健康状况是否比其他家庭更差或更好。理论预期产生了相反的预测:兄弟姐妹可能提供社会和情感支持,并减轻父母的养育压力,但独生子女可能从父母和祖父母那里得到更多的支持。利用 2010 年中国家庭动态跟踪调查数据,我们考察了中国成年人兄弟姐妹数量的婚姻匹配情况,并检验了兄弟姐妹的可用性和兄弟姐妹的匹配情况是否与主观身心健康有关。尽管人们普遍认为中国有极高比例的成年人没有兄弟姐妹,这可能导致家庭规模非常小,但研究结果表明,无兄弟姐妹的夫妻比例较低(即,配偶双方都是独生子女)。与有兄弟姐妹的同龄人相比,没有兄弟姐妹或姻亲兄弟姐妹的已婚成年人的主观身体健康状况更好,但主观心理健康水平相似。无兄弟姐妹的婚姻结合对农村和女性成年人的健康优势更大。中国兄弟姐妹比例的下降将塑造未来家庭人口动态,但对人口健康的影响似乎不如人们有时认为的那么严重。

相似文献

1
Sibling Availability, Sibling Sorting, and Subjective Health Among Chinese Adults.
Demography. 2024 Jun 1;61(3):797-827. doi: 10.1215/00703370-11376831.
2
Family planning and child mental health in China: the Nanjing Survey.
Am J Psychiatry. 1988 Nov;145(11):1396-403. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.11.1396.
5
The Sibling-in-Law: Understanding an Unknown Member of the Disability Community.
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2020 Oct 1;58(5):361-378. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-58.5.361.
7
Direct and Indirect Paths between Parental Marital Conflict and Children's Sibling Conflict in Chinese Families.
J Genet Psychol. 2023 Jul-Dec;184(4):274-286. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2022.2161344. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
8
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
10
Siblings of adults with intellectual disabilities in Chinese societies: A scoping review.
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2024 Sep;49(3):362-372. doi: 10.3109/13668250.2023.2271758. Epub 2023 Dec 22.

本文引用的文献

2
Number of Siblings in Childhood, Social Outcomes in Adulthood.
J Fam Issues. 2020 Feb;41(2):212-234. doi: 10.1177/0192513x19873356. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
3
The prevalence of depressive symptoms and its determinants among adults in mainland China: Results from a national household survey.
J Affect Disord. 2021 Feb 15;281:220-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.009. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
4
Economic Resources, Cultural Matching, and the Rural-Urban Boundary in China's Marriage Market.
J Marriage Fam. 2019 Jun;81(3):567-583. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12559. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
5
Formal comment on "Assessing the impact of the 'one-child policy' in China: A synthetic control approach".
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 6;14(11):e0222705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222705. eCollection 2019.
6
Assessing the impact of the "one-child policy" in China: A synthetic control approach.
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 6;14(11):e0220170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220170. eCollection 2019.
7
Challenging Myths About China's One-Child Policy.
China J. 2015 Jul;74:144-159. doi: 10.1086/681664.
8
The Family Safety Net of Black and White Multigenerational Families.
Popul Dev Rev. 2019 Jun;45(2):351-378. doi: 10.1111/padr.12233. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
9
The Aging Tsunami and Senior Healthcare Development in China.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Aug;66(8):1462-1468. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15424. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
10
The Sampling Design of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS).
Chin J Sociol. 2015 Dec;1(4):471-484. doi: 10.1177/2057150X15614535. Epub 2015 Dec 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验