Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Atlas University, Turkey; Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bahçeşehir University, Turkey.
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bahçeşehir University, Turkey.
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2024 Aug;56:101862. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101862. Epub 2024 May 28.
BACKGROUND: In recent years, human and animal studies have provided increasing evidence that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) can produce analgesic effects as well as alleviating resistant epilepsy and depression. Our study was designed to compare the efficacy of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation with conventional low back rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS: Sixty patients with LBP were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 received conventional rehabilitation and home exercise, and Group 2 received transcutaneous auricular VNS and home exercise. Both groups received treatment five days a week for three weeks. Trunk mobility (Modified Schober test, fingertip-to-floor test), muscle strength (CSMI-Cybex Humac-Norm isokinetic dynamometer and Lafayette manual muscle strength measuring device), trunk endurance, balance tests, Visual Analog Scale, Beck Depression Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Oswestry Disability Index were evaluated. RESULTS: At the end of three weeks, within-group assessment results showed positive effects on mobility, functional status, depression and sleep in all groups (p < 0.05). Pain level, endurance time and flexion trunk muscle strength results showed more improvement in Group 2 (p < 0.05). Some parameters of isokinetic lower extremity quadriceps muscle strength and fall risk scores showed a significant improvement in Group 1 (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: VNS has been observed to be more effective on pain, trunk muscle strength and endurance duration and sleep status. Auricular VNS may be included in the treatment of patients with CLBP in whom conventional physical therapy is inadequate or not applicable.
背景:近年来,人体和动物研究提供了越来越多的证据表明,迷走神经刺激(VNS)除了缓解耐药性癫痫和抑郁症外,还具有镇痛作用。我们的研究旨在比较经皮耳迷走神经刺激与慢性下腰痛(CLBP)常规康复治疗的疗效。
方法:60 例腰痛患者随机分为两组。第 1 组接受常规康复和家庭锻炼,第 2 组接受经皮耳迷走神经刺激和家庭锻炼。两组均每周治疗 5 天,共 3 周。评估躯干活动度(改良 Schober 试验、指尖至地面试验)、肌肉力量(CSMI-Cybex Humac-Norm 等速测力计和 Lafayette 手动肌肉力量测量仪)、躯干耐力、平衡测试、视觉模拟量表、贝克抑郁量表、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数、Oswestry 残疾指数。
结果:3 周后,两组内评估结果显示所有组的活动度、功能状态、抑郁和睡眠均有积极影响(p<0.05)。疼痛程度、耐力时间和屈髋肌肉力量结果显示第 2 组改善更明显(p<0.05)。第 1 组一些下肢四头肌等速力量参数和跌倒风险评分显著改善(p<0.05)。
讨论:VNS 对疼痛、躯干肌肉力量和耐力时间以及睡眠状态的影响更为显著。耳迷走神经刺激可能被纳入常规物理治疗不足或不适用的 CLBP 患者的治疗中。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024-6-26