Kawi Jennifer, Yeh Chao Hsing, Lukkahatai Nada, Wu Hulin, Morone Natalia E, Glick Ronald, Schlenk Elizabeth A, Campbell Claudia, Thrul Johannes, Huang Xinran, Wang Hongyu, Jia Hejingzi Monica, Christo Paul, Johnson Constance
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Cizik School of Nursing.
Johns Hopkins University, School of Nursing.
Pain Med. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaf035.
OBJECTIVE: Efficacious modalities are limited in chronic low back pain (cLBP). We determined the efficacy of auricular point acupressure (APA) in older adults with cLBP. METHODS: Participants, ≥ 60 years with cLBP, were randomized (1:1:1) to APA with ear points targeted to cLBP (T-APA, n = 92), points non-targeted to cLBP (NT-APA, n = 91), or waitlist education control (n = 89), and followed up to 6 months (6M). Participants in the APA groups received 4 weekly APA sessions; the education control group received 4 weekly educational sessions. Primary outcomes were pain and function. RESULTS: There were 272 participants (174 women [64%]; mean [SD] age 70.0 [6.95] years; 62% non-White). Compared to control, the T-APA group had significant improvement on pain from baseline to post-intervention and one-month (1M) follow-up by 1.73 and 1.26 points (p ≤ 0.001) respectively. The NT-APA group achieved similar improvements in pain. The improvement in function by T-APA and NT-APA was significant at post-intervention by 1.89 and 2.68 points (p = 0.04 and 0.004) respectively, minimal at 1M follow-up, but significant at 6M in both APA groups. There were no statistically significant differences in treatment responses between the APA groups. Both APA groups had higher responder rates in pain and function at post-intervention and 1M follow-up compared to the control group (odds ratio ranged from 2.11 to 6.32). The APA effects were sustained at 6M follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: APA treatments significantly improved pain and function compared to control; effects were sustained at 6M. APA should be recommended as a nonpharmacologic therapy for older adults with cLBP.
目的:慢性下腰痛(cLBP)的有效治疗方法有限。我们确定了耳穴按压(APA)对老年cLBP患者的疗效。 方法:年龄≥60岁的cLBP参与者被随机分为三组(1:1:1):针对cLBP的耳穴进行APA治疗(T-APA组,n = 92)、针对非cLBP耳穴进行APA治疗(NT-APA组,n = 91)或等待列表教育对照组(n = 89),随访6个月(6M)。APA组的参与者每周接受4次APA治疗;教育对照组每周接受4次教育课程。主要结局指标为疼痛和功能。 结果:共有272名参与者(174名女性[64%];平均[标准差]年龄70.0[6.95]岁;62%为非白人)。与对照组相比,T-APA组从基线到干预后及1个月(1M)随访时疼痛显著改善,分别改善了1.73分和1.26分(p≤0.001)。NT-APA组在疼痛方面也取得了类似的改善。T-APA组和NT-APA组在干预后功能分别改善了1.89分和2.68分(p = 0.04和0.004),在1M随访时改善最小,但在6M时两组均有显著改善。APA组之间的治疗反应无统计学显著差异。与对照组相比,两个APA组在干预后和1M随访时疼痛和功能的有效率更高(优势比范围为2.11至6.32)。APA的效果在6M随访时持续存在。 结论:与对照组相比,APA治疗显著改善了疼痛和功能;效果在6M时持续存在。对于老年cLBP患者,应推荐APA作为一种非药物治疗方法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024-11-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-1-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-11-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-5-28
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-3-7
Integr Cancer Ther. 2023
Pain Manag Nurs. 2023-2
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-11-11
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022-8-29