• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to mental health treatment access and engagement for LGBTQA+ people with psychosis: a scoping review protocol.LGBTQA+ 精神病患者获得和参与心理健康治疗的障碍和促进因素:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2024 May 30;13(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02566-5.
2
Barriers and facilitators to mental health care access and engagement for LGBTQA+ people with psychosis: A scoping review.LGBTQA+ 精神病患者获得和参与心理健康护理的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述。
Psychiatry Res. 2025 Jan;343:116281. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116281. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Exploring the barriers and facilitators to accessing and utilising mental health services in regional, rural, and remote Australia: A scoping review protocol.探索在澳大利亚偏远地区获取和利用心理健康服务的障碍和促进因素:范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 9;17(12):e0278606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278606. eCollection 2022.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Conceptual framework on barriers and facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care and treatment for women: the MATRIx evidence synthesis.关于为女性实施围产期心理健康护理和治疗的障碍与促进因素的概念框架:MATRIx证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jan;12(2):1-187. doi: 10.3310/KQFE0107.
7
Athletes' access to, attitudes towards and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: a scoping review protocol.运动员获取心理健康帮助的途径、态度和体验:系统综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e062279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062279.
8
Access to Health Care and Use of Health Care Services Among Males in Africa: Protocol for a Scoping Review.非洲男性获得医疗保健服务及使用情况:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 31;14:e52351. doi: 10.2196/52351.
9
Interventions addressing care staff views of older LGBTQ+ people in residential and homecare settings: a scoping review protocol.干预措施解决了居住和家庭护理环境中护理人员对老年 LGBTQ+人群的看法:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 23;14(10):e086497. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086497.
10
Barriers to and enablers of the transition from child and adolescent to adult mental health services for autistic young people and/or those with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: protocol for a scoping review.自闭症青年和/或注意力缺陷多动障碍患者从儿童和青少年精神卫生服务过渡到成人精神卫生服务的障碍和促进因素:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 17;14(8):e083373. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083373.

本文引用的文献

1
Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process.修订 JBI 定量批判性评价工具以提高其适用性:方法概述和开发过程。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Mar 1;21(3):478-493. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00125.
2
Equity in Mental Health Services for Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Considering Marginalized Identities and Stressors.为处于精神病临床高危状态的青少年提供心理健康服务的公平性:考虑边缘化身份和压力源
Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2022;7(2):176-197. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2022.2042874. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
3
Minority Stress and Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts Among LGBT Adolescents and Young Adults: A Meta-Analysis.少数群体压力与 LGBT 青少年和年轻人的自杀意念和自杀企图:一项荟萃分析。
LGBT Health. 2022 May-Jun;9(4):222-237. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2021.0106. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
4
What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis.什么是综述性评价?对综述性评价作为一种证据综合形式给出正式定义。
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Apr 1;20(4):950-952. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00483.
5
Differences by sexual orientation in treatment outcome and satisfaction with treatment among inpatients of a German psychiatric clinic.德国一家精神病诊所住院患者的治疗结果和对治疗的满意度在性取向上的差异。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0262928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262928. eCollection 2022.
6
Psychosis in transgender and gender non-conforming individuals: A review of the literature and a call for more research.跨性别和性别不一致个体中的精神病:文献综述及对更多研究的呼吁。
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Dec;306:114272. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114272. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
7
Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application.范围综述:加强和推进方法和应用。
Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 8;10(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3.
8
Unpacking stigma: Meta-analyses of correlates and moderators of personal stigma in psychosis.解析污名:精神分裂症个体污名的相关因素和调节因素的元分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Nov;89:102077. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102077. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
10
Hormone Therapy, Mental Health, and Quality of Life Among Transgender People: A Systematic Review.跨性别者的激素治疗、心理健康与生活质量:一项系统综述
J Endocr Soc. 2021 Feb 2;5(4):bvab011. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvab011. eCollection 2021 Apr 1.

LGBTQA+ 精神病患者获得和参与心理健康治疗的障碍和促进因素:系统评价方案。

Barriers and facilitators to mental health treatment access and engagement for LGBTQA+ people with psychosis: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.

Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2024 May 30;13(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02566-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02566-5
PMID:38816775
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11137929/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of psychosis has been shown to be disproportionately high amongst sexual and gender minority individuals. However, there is currently little consideration of the unique needs of this population in mental health treatment, with LGBTQA+ individuals facing barriers in accessing timely and non-stigmatising support for psychotic experiences. This issue deserves attention as delays to help-seeking and poor engagement with treatment predict worsened clinical and functional outcomes for people with psychosis. The present protocol describes the methodology for a scoping review which will aim to identify barriers and facilitators faced by LGBTQA+ individuals across the psychosis spectrum in help-seeking and accessing mental health support.

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy will be used to search Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, LGBTQ+ Source, and grey literature. Original studies of any design, setting, and publication date will be included if they discuss barriers and facilitators to mental health treatment access and engagement for LGBTQA+ people with experiences of psychosis. Two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts and full-text articles for inclusion in the review. Both reviewers will then extract the relevant data according to pre-determined criteria, and study quality will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklists. Key data from included studies will be synthesised in narrative form according to the Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews.

DISCUSSION

The results of this review will provide a comprehensive account of the current and historical barriers and facilitators to mental healthcare faced by LGBTQA+ people with psychotic symptoms and experiences. It is anticipated that the findings from this review will be relevant to clinical and community services and inform future research. Findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences.

SCOPING REVIEW REGISTRATION

This protocol is registered in Open Science Framework Registries ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AT6FC ).

摘要

背景

性少数群体和性别少数群体个体中精神疾病的发病率不成比例地高。然而,目前在精神卫生治疗中很少考虑到这一人群的特殊需求,LGBTQA+ 个体在获得及时和无污名化的精神体验支持方面面临障碍。由于寻求帮助的延迟和治疗参与度差会预测精神疾病患者的临床和功能结果恶化,因此这个问题值得关注。本方案描述了一项范围综述的方法学,该综述旨在确定 LGBTQA+ 个体在精神疾病谱系中寻求帮助和获得精神卫生支持时面临的障碍和促进因素。

方法

将使用全面的搜索策略在 Medline、PsycINFO、Embase、Scopus、LGBTQ+ 来源和灰色文献中进行搜索。如果研究讨论了 LGBTQA+ 有精神体验的个体在获得心理健康治疗和参与方面的障碍和促进因素,无论其设计、设置和发布日期如何,都将纳入原始研究。两名审查员将独立筛选标题/摘要和全文文章以确定是否纳入综述。两名审查员将根据预先确定的标准提取相关数据,并使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所 (JBI) 批判性评估清单评估研究质量。根据系统评价中叙事综合的指南,将根据纳入研究的关键数据以叙述形式进行综合。

讨论

该综述的结果将全面说明 LGBTQA+ 有精神病症状和体验的个体在获得精神保健方面当前和历史上的障碍和促进因素。预计该综述的结果将与临床和社区服务相关,并为未来的研究提供信息。研究结果将通过在同行评议期刊上发表和在会议上展示来传播。

范围综述注册

本方案在开放科学框架注册处(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AT6FC)注册。