• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗胆囊癌的系统评价和Meta分析

A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery for Gallbladder Cancer.

作者信息

Karjol Uday, Jonnada Pavan, Anwar Ali Zaid, Chandranath Ajay, Cheruku Sushama

机构信息

Surgical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, Karnataka India.

Pathology, Am Path Laboratories, Hyderabad, Telangana India.

出版信息

Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024 May;15(Suppl 2):218-225. doi: 10.1007/s13193-022-01654-z. Epub 2022 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1007/s13193-022-01654-z
PMID:38818007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11133283/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopy in gallbladder cancer (GBC) has a possible role in staging, radical cure, and palliation in gallbladder cancer. However, a few studies have advocated the use of laparoscopic approach and concluded the safety of this approach. This present study was undertaken to determine the safety and feasibility between open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with the non-metastatic GBC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic database search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar for relevant articles. As a result, a list of such studies, clinical trials, published in English up to May 2021, was obtained,14 studies were included and statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan software 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre).

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate was reported in 13 out of 14 studies (1388 patients), and all compared laparoscopic and open approach. There was no significant heterogeneity in between the studies (chi-square, 10.66; df, 12; , 0%). There was significant higher overall survival in open group (389/850 vs 194/538 or 1.45, 95% CI (1.12-1.88), value, 0.005). There was no significant difference in recurrence rate, operative time, blood loss, lymph node yield, and postoperative complication in between open and laparoscopic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our present study demonstrates that overall survival is significantly increased with open approach when compared with laparoscopic approach. There is no difference in recurrence rate, operative time, blood loss, lymph node yield, and postoperative complications between the open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy groups.

摘要

引言

腹腔镜检查在胆囊癌(GBC)中对分期、根治性治疗和姑息治疗可能具有一定作用。然而,仅有少数研究提倡使用腹腔镜手术方法并证实了该方法的安全性。本研究旨在确定非转移性胆囊癌患者行开放与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性和可行性。

材料与方法

在MEDLINE、Embase和谷歌学术中进行系统的数据库检索以获取相关文章。结果,获得了截至2021年5月以英文发表的此类研究、临床试验列表,纳入14项研究并使用RevMan软件5.3(北欧 Cochrane中心)进行统计分析。

结果

14项研究中的13项(1388例患者)报告了5年生存率,所有研究均比较了腹腔镜和开放手术方法。各研究之间无显著异质性(卡方检验,χ² = 10.66;自由度df = 12;P = 0%)。开放手术组的总生存率显著更高(389/850对比194/538,比值比OR = 1.45,95%置信区间CI(1.12 - 1.88),P值 = 0.005)。开放组与腹腔镜组在复发率、手术时间、失血量、淋巴结获取量及术后并发症方面无显著差异。

结论

我们目前的研究表明,与腹腔镜手术方法相比,开放手术方法可显著提高总生存率。开放与腹腔镜胆囊切除术组在复发率、手术时间、失血量、淋巴结获取量及术后并发症方面无差异。

相似文献

1
A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery for Gallbladder Cancer.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗胆囊癌的系统评价和Meta分析
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024 May;15(Suppl 2):218-225. doi: 10.1007/s13193-022-01654-z. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
2
Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Approach in Treating Gallbladder Cancer.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗胆囊癌的比较。
J Surg Res. 2019 Feb;234:269-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.025. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
3
Robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery for gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.机器人、腹腔镜和开放手术治疗胆囊癌:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):4846-4857. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11162-6. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
4
The role of laparoscopic surgery in the surgical management of gallbladder carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术在胆囊癌外科治疗中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Asian J Surg. 2021 Dec;44(12):1493-1502. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
5
Laparoscopic versus open treatment of gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗胆囊癌:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Minim Access Surg. 2018 Jul-Sep;14(3):185-191. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_223_16.
6
Laparoscopic surgery for early gallbladder carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.早期胆囊癌的腹腔镜手术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Mar 26;8(6):1074-1086. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i6.1074.
7
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic open surgery for T2 gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗T2期胆囊癌的短期和长期结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Dec 27;14(12):1387-1396. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i12.1387.
8
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 3(9):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub3.
9
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 12;2013(12):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub4.
10
[Safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: a meta-analysis].
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Nov 17;100(42):3342-3349. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200418-01229.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic surgery for early gallbladder carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.早期胆囊癌的腹腔镜手术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Mar 26;8(6):1074-1086. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i6.1074.
2
Retrospective comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for T2 gallbladder cancer - Thirteen-year experience.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗 T2 期胆囊癌的回顾性比较 - 十三年经验。
Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;29:142-147. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 May 13.
3
Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Approach in Treating Gallbladder Cancer.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗胆囊癌的比较。
J Surg Res. 2019 Feb;234:269-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.025. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
4
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
5
Validation of American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth staging system for gallbladder cancer and its lymphadenectomy guidelines.美国癌症联合委员会第八版胆囊癌分期系统及其淋巴结清扫指南的验证
J Surg Res. 2018 Oct;230:148-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.04.067. Epub 2018 May 31.
6
Laparoscopic versus open treatment of gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗胆囊癌:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Minim Access Surg. 2018 Jul-Sep;14(3):185-191. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_223_16.
7
Impact of Type of Surgery on Survival Outcome in Patients With Early Gallbladder Cancer in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery: Oncologic Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery.微创手术时代早期胆囊癌患者手术方式对生存结局的影响:腹腔镜手术的肿瘤学安全性
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(22):e3675. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003675.
8
Surgical approach does not influence the outcome of incidental gallbladder carcinoma.手术方式不影响意外胆囊癌的预后。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jan 15;8(1):869-75. eCollection 2015.
9
Novel strategy for laparoscopic treatment of pT2 gallbladder carcinoma.腹腔镜治疗pT2期胆囊癌的新策略
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3600-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4116-y. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
10
Minimally invasive versus the conventional open surgical approach of a radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: a retrospective comparative study.微创与传统开放手术治疗胆囊癌的根治性胆囊切除术:一项回顾性比较研究。
HPB (Oxford). 2015 Jun;17(6):536-41. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12406. Epub 2015 Feb 28.