Suppr超能文献

早期胆囊癌的腹腔镜手术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。

Laparoscopic surgery for early gallbladder carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Feng Xu, Cao Jia-Sheng, Chen Ming-Yu, Zhang Bin, Juengpanich Sarun, Hu Jia-Hao, Topatana Win, Li Shi-Jie, Shen Ji-Liang, Xiao Guang-Yuan, Cai Xiu-Jun, Yu Hong

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China.

Department of General Surgery, Jiaxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China.

出版信息

World J Clin Cases. 2020 Mar 26;8(6):1074-1086. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i6.1074.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a controversy as to whether laparoscopic surgery leads to a poor prognosis compared to the open approach for early gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). We hypothesized that the laparoscopic approach is an alternative for early GBC.

AIM

To identify and evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of early GBC.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of online databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane libraries, and Web of Science, was performed to identify non-comparative studies reporting the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and comparative studies involving laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in early GBC from January 2009 to October 2019. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed for 1- and 5-year overall survival and postoperative complications, while 3-year overall survival, operation time, blood loss, the number of lymph node dissected, and postoperative hospital stay were analyzed by random-effects models.

RESULTS

The review identified 7 comparative studies and 8 non-comparative studies. 1068 patients (laparoscopic surgery: 613; open surgery: 455) were included in the meta-analysis of 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival with no significant differences observed [(HR = 0.54; 95%CI: 0.29-1.00; = 0.0%; = 0.051), (HR = 0.75; 95%CI: 0.34-1.65; = 60.7%; = 0.474), (HR = 0.71; 95%CI: 0.47-1.08; = 49.6%; = 0.107), respectively]. There were no significant differences in operation time [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 18.69; 95%CI: -19.98-57.36; = 81.4%; = 0.343], intraoperative blood loss (WMD = -169.14; 95%CI: -377.86-39.57; = 89.5%; = 0.112), the number of lymph nodes resected (WMD = 0.12; 95%CI: -2.95-3.18; = 73.4%; = 0.940), and the complication rate (OR = 0.69; 95%CI: 0.30-1.58; = 0.0%; = 0.377 ) between the two groups, while patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery had a reduced length of hospital stay (WMD = -5.09; 95%CI: -8.74- -1.45; = 91.0%; = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis confirms that laparoscopic surgery is a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery with comparable survival and operation-related outcomes for early GBC.

摘要

背景

对于早期胆囊癌(GBC),与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术是否会导致预后不良存在争议。我们假设腹腔镜手术是早期GBC的一种替代方法。

目的

确定并评估腹腔镜手术治疗早期GBC的安全性和可行性。

方法

对在线数据库进行全面检索,包括MEDLINE(PubMed)、Cochrane图书馆和科学网,以识别2009年1月至2019年10月期间报告腹腔镜手术结果的非对比研究,以及涉及早期GBC腹腔镜手术和开放手术的对比研究。对1年和5年总生存率及术后并发症进行固定效应荟萃分析,而对3年总生存率、手术时间、失血量、清扫淋巴结数量和术后住院时间采用随机效应模型进行分析。

结果

该综述确定了7项对比研究和8项非对比研究。1068例患者(腹腔镜手术:613例;开放手术:455例)纳入了1年、3年和5年总生存率的荟萃分析,未观察到显著差异[(风险比(HR)=0.54;95%置信区间(CI):0.29 - 1.00;I² = 0.0%;P = 0.051),(HR = 0.75;95%CI:0.34 - 1.65;I² = 60.7%;P = 0.474),(HR = 0.71;95%CI:0.47 - 1.08;I² = 49.6%;P = 0.107),分别]。两组在手术时间[加权平均差(WMD)=18.69;95%CI: - 19.98 - 57.36;I² = 81.4%;P = 0.343]、术中失血量(WMD = - 169.14;95%CI: - 377.86 - 39.57;I² = 89.5%;P = 0.112)、切除淋巴结数量(WMD = 0.12;95%CI: - 2.95 - 3.18;I² = 73.4%;P = 0.940)和并发症发生率(比值比(OR)=0.69;95%CI:0.30 - 1.58;I² = 0.0%;P = 0.377)方面无显著差异,而接受腹腔镜手术的患者住院时间缩短(WMD = - 5.09;95%CI: - 8.74 - - 1.45;I² = 91.0%;P = 0.006)。

结论

本系统评价和荟萃分析证实,对于早期GBC,腹腔镜手术是一种安全可行的替代开放手术的方法,且生存和手术相关结局相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6488/7103978/471bfbfe3957/WJCC-8-1074-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验