National Institute of Mental Health.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Dec 1;36(12):2627-2638. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02191.
The dual stream model of the human and non-human primate visual systems remains Leslie Ungerleider's (1946-2020) most indelible contribution to visual neuroscience. In this model, a dorsal "where" stream specialized for visuospatial representation extends through occipitoparietal cortex, whereas a ventral "what" stream specialized for representing object qualities extends through occipitotemporal cortex. Over time, this model underwent a number of revisions and expansions. In one of her last scientific contributions, Leslie proposed a third visual stream specialized for representing dynamic signals related to social perception. This alteration invites the question: What is a visual stream, and how are different visual streams individuated? In this article, we first consider and reject a simple answer to this question based on a common idealizing visualization of the model, which conflicts with the complexities of the visual system that the model was intended to capture. Next, we propose a taxonomic answer that takes inspiration from the philosophy of science and Leslie's body of work, which distinguishes between neural mechanisms, pathways, and streams. In this taxonomy, visual streams are superordinate to pathways and mechanisms and provide individuation conditions for determining whether collections of cortical connections delineate different visual streams. Given this characterization, we suggest that the proposed third visual stream does not yet meet these conditions, although the tripartite model still suggests important revisions to how we think about the organization of the human and non-human primate visual systems.
人类和非人类灵长类动物视觉系统的双通道模型仍然是 Leslie Ungerleider(1946-2020)对视觉神经科学最不可磨灭的贡献。在这个模型中,一个专门用于视空间表示的背侧“在哪里”流通过顶枕叶皮层延伸,而一个专门用于表示物体质量的腹侧“是什么”流通过顶枕颞叶皮层延伸。随着时间的推移,这个模型经历了多次修订和扩展。在她最后一项科学贡献中,Leslie 提出了第三个专门用于表示与社会感知相关的动态信号的视觉流。这种改变引发了一个问题:什么是视觉流,如何区分不同的视觉流?在本文中,我们首先考虑并拒绝了基于模型常见理想化可视化的简单答案,因为该答案与模型旨在捕捉的视觉系统的复杂性相冲突。接下来,我们提出了一个分类学答案,该答案借鉴了科学哲学和 Leslie 的工作,将神经机制、途径和流区分开来。在这个分类学中,视觉流是途径和机制的上位概念,并为确定皮质连接的集合是否描绘了不同的视觉流提供了个体化条件。有了这个特征,我们建议提议的第三视觉流尚未满足这些条件,尽管三分模型仍然建议对我们思考人类和非人类灵长类动物视觉系统的组织方式进行重要修订。