• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理中特殊持续质量改进对不良护理事件管理的影响:回顾性研究。

Effects of a special continuous quality improvement in nursing on the management of adverse care events: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, The First People's Hospital of Xiangtan City, No. 21 Shuyuan Road, Yuetang District, Xiangtan City, 411101, Hunan, China.

Department of Nursing, Xiangtan Central Hospital, No.120 Heping Road, Yuhu District, Xiangtan City, 411100, Hunan, China.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 31;24(1):692. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10913-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-10913-4
PMID:38822344
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11143752/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the application effect of the direct reporting system of adverse nursing events and special continuous nursing quality improvement measures in the management of these adverse events.

METHODS

The implementation time of continuous nursing improvement based on the direct reporting system was the demarcation point. We retrospectively collected and analyzed nursing adverse event reports and hospitalization data from Xiangtan Central Hospital before implementation (2015-2018) and after implementation (2019-2022). The active reporting rate of adverse events, the composition of these events and the processing time were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The rate of active reporting of adverse events before the implementation was lower than that after the implementation (6.7% vs. 8.1%, X = 25.561, P < 0.001). After the implementation of the direct reporting system for nursing events and the continuous improvement of nursing quality, the reporting proportion of first-level and second-level events decreased significantly. Moreover, the reporting proportion of third-level events increased significantly. The proportion of falls and medication errors decreased, and the proportion of unplanned extubation, infusion xerostomia and improper operation increased. The processing time of the reported nursing adverse events was significantly reduced (31.87 ± 7.83 vs. 56.87 ± 8.21, t = 18.73, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The direct reporting system of adverse nursing events and the continuous improvement measures for nursing quality can effectively improve the active reporting rate of adverse events, change their composition and reduce their processing time, as well as help create a safe psychological environment for both patients and nursing staff.

摘要

目的

探讨不良护理事件直接报告制度与专项持续护理质量改进措施在护理不良事件管理中的应用效果。

方法

以实施持续护理质量改进为时间节点,回顾性收集湘潭市中心医院实施不良事件直接报告制度前(2015-2018 年)和实施后(2019-2022 年)的护理不良事件报告和住院患者资料,比较两组不良事件主动报告率、构成比及处理时间。

结果

实施不良事件直接报告制度前不良事件主动报告率低于实施后(6.7%比 8.1%,X²=25.561,P<0.001)。实施护理事件直接报告制度和持续护理质量改进后,一级、二级事件报告构成比显著降低,三级事件报告构成比显著升高,跌倒和用药错误报告构成比降低,非计划性拔管、输液口腔干燥和操作不当报告构成比升高。不良事件报告处理时间明显缩短(31.87±7.83比 56.87±8.21,t=18.73,P<0.001)。

结论

不良护理事件直接报告制度与护理质量持续改进措施能有效提高不良事件主动报告率,改变不良事件构成,缩短处理时间,有助于营造患者和护理人员安全的心理环境。

相似文献

1
Effects of a special continuous quality improvement in nursing on the management of adverse care events: a retrospective study.护理中特殊持续质量改进对不良护理事件管理的影响:回顾性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 31;24(1):692. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10913-4.
2
The safety of hospital stroke care.医院中风护理的安全性。
Neurology. 2007 Feb 20;68(8):550-5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000254992.39919.2e.
3
Patient safety in surgical settings: A study on the challenges and improvement strategies in adverse event reporting from a nursing perspective.手术环境中的患者安全:从护理角度研究不良事件报告中的挑战和改进策略。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Jun;33(6):2324-2336. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17047. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
4
Accuracy of harm scores entered into an event reporting system.录入事件报告系统的伤害评分的准确性。
J Nurs Adm. 2015 Apr;45(4):218-25. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000188.
5
[Errors in medicine. Causes, impact and improvement measures to improve patient safety].[医学中的差错。提高患者安全的原因、影响及改进措施]
Anaesthesist. 2015 Sep;64(9):689-704. doi: 10.1007/s00101-015-0052-4.
6
Does error and adverse event reporting by physicians and nurses differ?医生和护士的错误及不良事件报告有差异吗?
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Sep;34(9):537-45. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34068-9.
7
Nursing care quality and adverse events in US hospitals.美国医院的护理质量与不良事件
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Aug;19(15-16):2185-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03250.x.
8
Lessons learned: use of event reporting by nurses to improve patient safety and quality.经验教训:护士使用事件报告来提高患者安全和质量。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2011 Apr;26(2):149-55. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2010.12.005.
9
Nursing-related patient safety events in hospitals.医院中与护理相关的患者安全事件。
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2009 Apr;29(2):265-8. doi: 10.1007/s11596-009-0227-9. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
10
Association of Nursing Practice Environment on reported adverse events in private management hospitals: A cross-sectional study.护理实践环境对私立管理医院报告不良事件的影响:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Oct;30(19-20):2990-3000. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15806. Epub 2021 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing Nurses' Barriers to Reporting Adverse Events Using a WeChat-Based Cognitive Load Training Platform: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.使用基于微信的认知负荷训练平台降低护士报告不良事件的障碍:一项开放标签随机对照试验
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Mar 21;18:947-961. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S482233. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Caprini assessment utilization and impact on patient safety in gynecologic surgery.卡普里尼评估在妇科手术中的应用及其对患者安全的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Sep;308(3):901-912. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07038-0. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
2
Development and Validation of a Questionnaire of the Perioperative Nursing Competencies in Patient Safety.围手术期护理患者安全能力问卷的编制与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 23;19(5):2584. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052584.
3
[On the safe side? Safety culture and patient safety in German anesthesiology clinics-A nationwide survey on the status quo].[为安全起见?德国麻醉科诊所的安全文化与患者安全——一项关于现状的全国性调查]
Anaesthesiologie. 2022 Jul;71(7):526-534. doi: 10.1007/s00101-021-01073-9. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
4
Are the World Health Organization's Patient Safety Learning Objectives Still Up-to-Date: A Group Concept Mapping Study.世界卫生组织患者安全学习目标是否仍然与时俱进:一项群组概念映射研究。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Dec 1;18(8):731-737. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000993. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
5
A blueprint for building an emergency department quality improvement and patient safety committee.建立急诊科质量改进和患者安全委员会的蓝图。
CJEM. 2022 Mar;24(2):195-205. doi: 10.1007/s43678-021-00252-2. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
6
Quality and Safety in Long-Term Care in Ontario: The Impact of Language Discordance.安大略省长期护理中的质量和安全:语言差异的影响。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Oct;22(10):2147-2153.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.12.007. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
7
Quality Olympics: Experiential Interprofessional Learning to Improve Quality and Safety.质量奥运:体验式跨专业学习,提升质量与安全。
J Nurs Educ. 2020 Oct 1;59(10):589-593. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20200921-10.
8
Exploring challenges in quality and safety work in nursing homes and home care - a case study as basis for theory development.探索养老院和家庭护理中的质量和安全工作挑战——以案例研究为基础的理论发展。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 3;20(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05149-x.
9
Nurses' sleep, work hours, and patient care quality, and safety.护士的睡眠、工作时间与患者护理质量和安全。
Sleep Health. 2020 Jun;6(3):314-320. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2019.11.001. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
10
The occurrence, types, consequences and preventability of in-hospital adverse events - a scoping review.住院不良事件的发生率、类型、后果及可预防性——一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 4;18(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3335-z.