National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), London, UK.
Fortrea, Maidenhead, UK.
Int J Toxicol. 2024 Sep-Oct;43(5):456-463. doi: 10.1177/10915818241255885. Epub 2024 May 31.
Chronic repeated-dose toxicity studies are required to support long-term dosing in late-stage clinical trials, providing data to adequately characterize adverse effects of potential concern for human safety. Different regulatory guidances for the design and duration of chronic toxicity studies are available, with flexibility in approaches often adopted for specific drug modalities. These guidances may provide opportunities to reduce time, cost, compound requirement and animal use within drug development programs if applied more broadly and considered outside their current scopes of use. This article summarizes presentations from a workshop at the 43 Annual Meeting of the American College of Toxicology (ACT) in November 2022, discussing different approaches for chronic toxicity studies. A recent industry collaboration between the Netherlands Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB) and UK National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) illustrated current practices and the value of chronic toxicity studies for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and evaluated a weight of evidence (WOE) model where a 3-month study rather than a 6-month study might be adequate. Other topics included potential opportunities for single-species chronic toxicity studies for small molecules, peptides and oligonucleotides and whether a 6-month duration non-rodent study can be used more routinely than a 9-month study (similar to ICH S6(R1) for biological products). Also addressed were opportunities to optimize recovery animal use if warranted and whether restriction to one study only (if at all) can be applied more widely within and outside ICH S6(R1).
慢性重复剂量毒性研究对于支持晚期临床试验中的长期给药是必要的,可为潜在关注人类安全性的不良反应提供充分特征数据。不同的监管指南对于慢性毒性研究的设计和持续时间有不同的要求,对于特定药物模式通常采用了灵活的方法。如果更广泛地应用这些指南,并考虑到其当前使用范围之外的情况,那么在药物开发项目中,它们可能有机会减少时间、成本、化合物需求和动物使用。本文总结了 2022 年 11 月在美国毒理学学会第 43 届年会上举行的一次研讨会的演讲内容,讨论了慢性毒性研究的不同方法。荷兰药品评价委员会 (MEB) 和英国国家替代、改良和减少动物研究中心 (NC3Rs) 最近开展的行业合作,说明了单克隆抗体 (mAb) 慢性毒性研究的当前实践和价值,并评估了一种证据权重 (WOE) 模型,其中 3 个月的研究而不是 6 个月的研究可能足够。其他主题包括小分子、肽和寡核苷酸的单物种慢性毒性研究的潜在机会,以及是否可以更常规地使用 6 个月而非 9 个月的非啮齿动物研究 (类似于 ICH S6(R1) 中对生物制品的要求)。还讨论了如果有必要,优化恢复动物使用的机会,以及是否可以更广泛地在 ICH S6(R1) 内和之外限制仅进行一项研究。