Department of Addiction Research, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
J Clin Psychol. 2024 Oct;80(10):2099-2116. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23724. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
The UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale is a widely used self-report measure of impulsivity, but there is currently no validated German version that includes the Positive Urgency scale.
We combined existing German translations of UPPS scales and included the Positive Urgency dimension to validate the UPPS-P in a sample of 399 participants. In addition, we developed a revised short version of the UPPS-P (SUPPS-P) with 20 items and conducted a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to verify the structure in an independent validation sample with 349 participants. To determine evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, we used measures of impulsivity, depression, anxiety, stress, problematic alcohol and substance use.
CFA of the five factorial structure of the UPPS-P demonstrated acceptable fits and evidence of validity and reliability for the subscales. Psychometric characteristics of the SUPPS-P using the original item configuration were not satisfactory. As a result, we developed a revised German version of the SUPPS-P and confirmed the five-factor structure using a CFA in the validation sample. For the revised version, model fits and evidence of validity and internal consistencies were good. Associations with other constructs were as expected. For example, whereas Sensation Seeking was associated moderately with problematic alcohol use, lacking associations of Lack of Premeditation to internalizing symptoms showed evidence of discriminant validity.
The German translations of both UPPS-P and SUPPS-P are valid tools for measuring impulsive behaviors. They are well-suited for exploring the associations between different facets of impulsivity and psychopathological phenomena.
UPPS-P 冲动行为量表是一种广泛使用的冲动性自评量表,但目前尚无包含正性冲动维度的验证过的德文版本。
我们将 UPPS 量表的现有德文译本进行了组合,并纳入了正性冲动维度,以在 399 名参与者的样本中验证 UPPS-P。此外,我们开发了 UPPS-P 的修订短版(SUPPS-P),其中包含 20 个项目,并在 349 名参与者的独立验证样本中进行了验证性因素分析(CFA),以验证结构。为了确定收敛和判别效度的证据,我们使用了冲动性、抑郁、焦虑、压力、问题性酒精和物质使用的测量方法。
UPPS-P 的五因素结构的 CFA 显示出可接受的拟合度和有效性证据,以及子量表的可靠性。使用原始项目配置的 SUPPS-P 的心理测量特性并不令人满意。因此,我们开发了 SUPPS-P 的修订德文版,并在验证样本中使用 CFA 确认了五因素结构。对于修订版,模型拟合度以及有效性和内部一致性的证据良好。与其他结构的关联符合预期。例如,感觉寻求与问题性酒精使用中度相关,而缺乏预谋与内化症状的关联则显示出判别效度的证据。
UPPS-P 和 SUPPS-P 的德文翻译版本都是测量冲动行为的有效工具。它们非常适合探索不同冲动性特征与心理病理现象之间的关联。