School of Nursing, University of Rochester, 255 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, 265 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Eat Behav. 2024 Dec;55:101887. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2024.101887. Epub 2024 May 23.
The Weight-Related Eating Questionnaire (WREQ), designed for assessing distinct constructs of dietary restraint and disinhibition-related eating behaviors, has not been validated in pregnancy. This secondary data analysis aimed to evaluate the WREQ's psychometrics in a diverse sample of pregnant women from the eMoms randomized controlled trial (N = 1399), randomly split for exploratory (EFA, n = 691) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA, n = 708). Cronbach's alpha and corrected item-total correlation was used to examine internal consistency reliability. Sequential multiple regression analyses were used to assess criterion validity. EFA revealed three factors - dietary restraint, susceptibility to external cues, and emotional eating - accounting for 65.6 % of total variances. Parallel analysis confirmed a combination of two restraint subtypes (routine restraint and compensatory restraint). CFA showed that item 3 for assessing routine restraint had the lowest squared multiple correlation (0.22). The overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.87 demonstrated good internal consistency. Dietary restraint was negatively associated with the intake of energy (p = .03) and carbohydrates (p = .02), whereas susceptibility to external cues was positively associated with the intake of energy (p < .001), carbohydrates (p < .001), and total fat (p = .003). Additionally, emotional eating was positively associated with early-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) after adjustment for covariates (p < .001). These findings confirmed the reliability of the WREQ, the construct validity for susceptibility to external cues and emotional eating, and demonstrated its criterion validity regarding nutritional intake in pregnant women.
体重相关进食问卷(WREQ)旨在评估饮食抑制和与抑制解除相关的进食行为的不同结构,尚未在妊娠期间进行验证。本二次数据分析旨在评估 WREQ 在 eMoms 随机对照试验(N=1399)的多样化孕妇样本中的心理测量学特性,随机分为探索性(EFA,n=691)和验证性因素分析(CFA,n=708)。使用克朗巴赫α和校正项目-总分相关来评估内部一致性可靠性。序列多重回归分析用于评估效标效度。EFA 显示三个因素 - 饮食抑制、对外界线索的易感性和情绪性进食 - 占总方差的 65.6%。平行分析证实了两种抑制亚型(常规抑制和补偿性抑制)的组合。CFA 显示评估常规抑制的项目 3 的平方多重相关系数最低(0.22)。总体克朗巴赫α为 0.87,表明内部一致性良好。饮食抑制与能量(p=0.03)和碳水化合物(p=0.02)的摄入呈负相关,而对外界线索的易感性与能量(p<0.001)、碳水化合物(p<0.001)和总脂肪(p=0.003)的摄入呈正相关。此外,情绪性进食与调整协变量后的早孕期体重指数(BMI)呈正相关(p<0.001)。这些发现证实了 WREQ 的可靠性,以及对外界线索和情绪性进食的结构有效性,并证明了其在孕妇营养摄入方面的效标效度。