Institute of Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Bordeaux, CNRS UMR 5293, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
Institute of Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Bordeaux, CNRS UMR 5293, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
Neurobiol Dis. 2024 Sep;199:106544. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2024.106544. Epub 2024 May 31.
Neuroscience attracted increasing attention in mass media during the last decades. Indeed, neuroscience advances raise high expectations in society concerning major societal issues such as mental health and learning difficulties. Unfortunately, according to leading experts, neuroscience advances have not yet benefited patients, students and socially deprived families. Yet, neuroscience findings are widely overstated and misrepresented in the media. Academic studies, briefly described here, showed that most data misrepresentations were already present in the neuroscience literature before spreading in mass media. This triumphalist neuroscience discourse reinforces a neuro-essentialist conception of mental disorders and of learning difficulties. By emphasizing brain plasticity, this discourse fuels the neoliberal ethics that overvalue autonomy, rationality, flexibility and individual responsibility. According to this unrealistic rhetoric, neuroscience-based techniques will soon bring inexpensive private solutions to enduring social problems. When considering the social consequences of this rhetoric, neuroscientists should refrain from overstating the interpretation of their observations in their scientific publications and in their exchanges with journalists.
在过去几十年里,神经科学在大众媒体中受到越来越多的关注。事实上,神经科学的进步给社会带来了很高的期望,涉及到重大的社会问题,如心理健康和学习困难。不幸的是,据权威专家称,神经科学的进步尚未使患者、学生和社会弱势群体受益。然而,神经科学的发现却在媒体中被广泛夸大和误解。这里简要描述的学术研究表明,大多数数据错误已经在神经科学文献中出现,然后才传播到大众媒体。这种胜利主义的神经科学话语强化了一种神经本质主义的观念,即精神障碍和学习困难。通过强调大脑的可塑性,这种话语助长了新自由主义伦理,过分强调自主性、理性、灵活性和个人责任。根据这种不切实际的言论,基于神经科学的技术将很快为持久的社会问题提供廉价的私人解决方案。当考虑到这种言论的社会后果时,神经科学家应该避免在他们的科学出版物和与记者的交流中夸大对他们观察结果的解释。