Suppr超能文献

比较同伴和教师反馈在异步腹腔镜技能获取中的作用。

Comparing Peer and Faculty Feedback for Asynchronous Laparoscopic Skill Acquisition.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco California.

Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco California.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2024 Aug;81(8):1154-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.05.011. Epub 2024 May 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Traditionally, expert surgeons have provided surgical trainees with feedback about their simulation performance, including for asynchronous practice. Unfortunately, innumerable time demands may limit experts' ability to provide feedback. It is unknown whether and how peer feedback is an effective mechanism to help residents acquire laparoscopic skill in an asynchronous setting. As such, we aimed to assess the effect of peer feedback on laparoscopic performance and determine how residents perceive giving and receiving peer feedback.

DESIGN

We conducted a convergent mixed methods study. In the quantitative component, we randomized residents to receive feedback on home laparoscopic tasks from peers or faculty. We then held an end-of-curriculum, in-person laparoscopic assessment with members from both groups and compared performance on the in-person assessment between the groups. In the qualitative component, we conducted interviews with resident participants to explore experiences with feedback and performance. Three authors coded and rigorously reviewed interview data using a directed content analysis.

SETTING

We performed this study at a single tertiary academic institution: the University of California, San Francisco.

PARTICIPANTS

We invited 47 junior residents in general surgery, obstetrics-gynecology, and urology to participate, of whom 37 (79%) participated in the home curriculum and 25 (53%) participated in the end-of-curriculum assessment.

RESULTS

Residents in the peer feedback group scored similarly on the final assessment (mean 70.7%; SD 16.1%) as residents in the faculty feedback group (mean 71.8%; SD 11.9%) (p = 0.86). Through qualitative analysis of interviews with 13 residents, we identified key reasons for peer feedback's efficacy: shared mental models, the ability to brainstorm and appreciate new approaches, and a low-stakes learning environment.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that peer and faculty feedback led to similar performance in basic laparoscopy and that residents engaged positively with peer feedback, suggesting that peer feedback can be used when residents learn basic laparoscopy.

摘要

目的

传统上,专家外科医生会为模拟训练提供反馈,包括异步练习。不幸的是,无数的时间需求可能限制了专家提供反馈的能力。目前尚不清楚同伴反馈是否以及如何成为帮助住院医师在异步环境中获得腹腔镜技能的有效机制。因此,我们旨在评估同伴反馈对腹腔镜表现的影响,并确定住院医师如何看待提供和接受同伴反馈。

设计

我们进行了一项收敛混合方法研究。在定量部分,我们将住院医师随机分配接受来自同行或教师的家庭腹腔镜任务反馈。然后,我们与来自两组的成员一起进行了课程结束时的现场腹腔镜评估,并比较了两组之间现场评估的表现。在定性部分,我们对住院医师参与者进行了访谈,以探讨他们对反馈和表现的经验。三位作者使用定向内容分析对访谈数据进行了编码和严格审查。

地点

我们在一个单一的三级学术机构进行了这项研究:加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校。

参与者

我们邀请了 47 名普通外科、妇产科和泌尿科的初级住院医师参加,其中 37 名(79%)参加了家庭课程,25 名(53%)参加了课程结束时的评估。

结果

接受同伴反馈的小组在最终评估中的得分与接受教师反馈的小组相似(平均 70.7%;SD 16.1%)(p=0.86)。通过对 13 名住院医师的访谈进行定性分析,我们确定了同伴反馈有效性的关键原因:共享心理模型、集思广益和欣赏新方法的能力以及低风险的学习环境。

结论

我们发现同伴和教师反馈在基础腹腔镜手术中都能带来相似的表现,并且住院医师对同伴反馈持积极态度,这表明在住院医师学习基础腹腔镜时可以使用同伴反馈。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验