• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of Squegg™ - smart dynamometer and handgrip trainer in healthy individuals.Squegg™智能测力计和握力训练器在健康个体中的同时效度和重测信度。
Hand Ther. 2024 Jun;29(2):68-74. doi: 10.1177/17589983231223868. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
2
Validity and reliability of Squegg device in measuring isometric handgrip strength.Squegg 装置测量等长握力的有效性和可靠性。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Nov;27(21):10247-10254. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202311_34300.
3
Interinstrument Reliability Between the Squegg® Smart Dynamometer and Hand Grip Trainer and the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer: A Pilot Study.Squegg®智能测力计与握力训练器和Jamar®液压式握力计之间的仪器间可靠性:一项初步研究。
Am J Occup Ther. 2023 Sep 1;77(5). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2023.050099.
4
Study of Reliability and Validity of the Load Cell-Type Hand Dynamometer Compared to the Jamar Dynamometer and the Number of Reliable Grip Strength Measurements.《研究与握力计相比,压力传感器型握力计的可靠性和有效性,以及可靠握力测量次数。》
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2023 Oct;28(5):562-572. doi: 10.1142/S2424835523500601. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
5
Reliability and validity of two hand dynamometers when used by community-dwelling adults aged over 50 years.50 岁以上社区居住成年人使用两种握力计的可靠性和有效性。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jul 15;22(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03270-6.
6
The Martin Vigorimeter Represents a Reliable and More Practical Tool Than the Jamar Dynamometer to Assess Handgrip Strength in the Geriatric Patient.对于评估老年患者的握力,马丁握力计是一种比贾马尔测力计更可靠且更实用的工具。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 May 1;17(5):466.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.02.026.
7
Reliability and Validity of Shoulder and Handgrip Strength Testing.肩部和握力测试的可靠性与有效性
Physiother Can. 2023 Feb 8;75(1):65-71. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2021-0041. eCollection 2023 Winter.
8
Measuring handgrip strength in school children: inter-instrument reliability between Takei and Jamar.测量学童的握力:Takei 和 Jamar 两种仪器之间的仪器间可靠性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 11;14(1):1074. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51368-1.
9
Validity and reliability of handgrip dynamometry in older adults: A comparison of two widely used dynamometers.握力计在老年人中的有效性和可靠性:两种常用握力计的比较。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 21;17(6):e0270132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270132. eCollection 2022.
10
Reliability and validity of the K-force grip dynamometer in healthy subjects: do we need to assess it three times?K力握力计在健康受试者中的可靠性和有效性:我们需要评估三次吗?
Hand Ther. 2023 Mar;28(1):33-39. doi: 10.1177/17589983231152958. Epub 2023 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Hand-Grip Strength Measurement Using the Pablo Virtual Reality System in Young Adults.使用巴勃罗虚拟现实系统评估年轻人的握力测量
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jul 29;31:e949357. doi: 10.12659/MSM.949357.
2
Impact of Glucose Profile, Fasting Insulin, and Renal Function on Sarcopenia in Elderly at Single Centered Nursing Home: A Cross-Sectional Structural Equation Model Analysis.单中心养老院老年人血糖谱、空腹胰岛素及肾功能对肌肉减少症的影响:横断面结构方程模型分析
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Mar 6;18:1393-1404. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S486370. eCollection 2025.
3
Exploring the Connections Between Grip Strength, Nutritional Status, Frailty, Depression, and Cognition as Initial Assessment Tools in Geriatric Rehabilitation-A Pilot Study.探索握力、营养状况、衰弱、抑郁和认知之间的关联作为老年康复初始评估工具的一项试点研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Nov 21;60(12):1916. doi: 10.3390/medicina60121916.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability and validity of two hand dynamometers when used by community-dwelling adults aged over 50 years.50 岁以上社区居住成年人使用两种握力计的可靠性和有效性。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jul 15;22(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03270-6.
2
Grip Strength: An Indispensable Biomarker For Older Adults.握力:老年人不可或缺的生物标志物。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Oct 1;14:1681-1691. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S194543. eCollection 2019.
3
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
4
A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach.握力测量在临床和流行病学研究中的评价:走向标准化方法。
Age Ageing. 2011 Jul;40(4):423-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr051. Epub 2011 May 30.
5
Grip force and pinch grip in an adult population: reference values and factors associated with grip force.成年人群的握力和捏力:参考值及与握力相关的因素。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2012 May;19(3):288-96. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2011.553687. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
6
Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research.研究中使用的测量工具的有效性和可靠性。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Dec 1;65(23):2276-84. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070364.
7
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
8
Reliability and validity of the DynEx dynamometer.DynEx测力计的可靠性和有效性。
J Hand Ther. 2005 Jul-Sep;18(3):339-47. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.04.002.
9
Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength.用于测量握力的Rolyan测力计和Jamar测力计的比较。
Occup Ther Int. 2002;9(3):201-9. doi: 10.1002/oti.165.
10
Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for hand strength.手部力量的测试者内和测试者间可靠性及参考值。
J Rehabil Med. 2001 Jan;33(1):36-41. doi: 10.1080/165019701300006524.

Squegg™智能测力计和握力训练器在健康个体中的同时效度和重测信度。

Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of Squegg™ - smart dynamometer and handgrip trainer in healthy individuals.

作者信息

Amin Zarmina, Gutierrez Galilea, True Larissa

机构信息

Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA.

出版信息

Hand Ther. 2024 Jun;29(2):68-74. doi: 10.1177/17589983231223868. Epub 2024 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1177/17589983231223868
PMID:38827653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11143943/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Handgrip strength is crucial for overall health and is often evaluated using hand dynamometers. Two hand dynamometers were used in the study: the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer and Squegg™ Smart Dynamometer and Handgrip Trainer, which is a relatively new, Bluetooth-enabled device to measure handgrip strength. The purpose of the study was to compare Jamar and Squegg to determine concurrent validity and, separately, test-retest reliability of Squegg.

METHODS

The cross-sectional study measured bimanual handgrip strength using the Jamar and Squegg in two sessions, following standard protocols. Participants were 18+ years old, with no hand disease or dysfunction. Spearman's rank correlations were used to evaluate concurrent validity between Jamar and Squegg. Test-retest reliability was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates and 95% confidence intervals calculated using a mean-rating ( = 2) absolute agreement, 2-way mixed effects model.

RESULTS

Data from 594 participants were used to evaluate concurrent validity. Moderately strong correlations between Jamar and Squegg values for the right hand (RH) (ρ = 0.670; = .001) and Jamar and Squegg values for the left hand (LH) (ρ = 0.730; = .001) were found, indicating 'good' concurrent validity. Test-retest reliability for Squegg ranged from good to excellent (RH, ICC = 0.911, 95% CI (0.895, 0.924), = .001; LH, ICC = 0.928, 95% CI (0.915, 0.939), = .001).

DISCUSSION

The Squegg demonstrated good concurrent validity with Jamar and good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. It can be recommended as an alternative to the Jamar as a handgrip strength measurement tool. Squegg, which uses Bluetooth technology, is a reliable and cost-effective option for consistent handgrip strength testing.

摘要

引言

握力对整体健康至关重要,通常使用握力计进行评估。本研究使用了两种握力计:Jamar®液压握力计和Squegg™智能握力计及握力训练器,后者是一种相对较新的、支持蓝牙的测量握力的设备。本研究的目的是比较Jamar和Squegg,以确定同时效度,并分别测试Squegg的重测信度。

方法

这项横断面研究按照标准方案,分两个阶段使用Jamar和Squegg测量双侧握力。参与者年龄在18岁及以上,无手部疾病或功能障碍。使用Spearman等级相关性来评估Jamar和Squegg之间的同时效度。使用组内相关系数(ICC)估计值和95%置信区间评估重测信度,置信区间使用平均评分(=2)绝对一致性、双向混合效应模型计算。

结果

594名参与者的数据用于评估同时效度。发现右手(RH)的Jamar和Squegg值之间存在中度强相关性(ρ = 0.670;=0.001),左手(LH)的Jamar和Squegg值之间存在中度强相关性(ρ = 0.730;=0.001),表明具有“良好”的同时效度。Squegg的重测信度从良好到优秀不等(右手,ICC = 0.911,95%CI(0.895,0.924),=0.001;左手,ICC = 0.928,95%CI(0.915,0.939),=0.001)。

讨论

Squegg与Jamar表现出良好的同时效度,重测信度良好到优秀。它可以作为Jamar的替代品,推荐作为握力测量工具。使用蓝牙技术的Squegg是进行一致握力测试的可靠且经济高效的选择。