Suppr超能文献

Squegg™智能测力计和握力训练器在健康个体中的同时效度和重测信度。

Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of Squegg™ - smart dynamometer and handgrip trainer in healthy individuals.

作者信息

Amin Zarmina, Gutierrez Galilea, True Larissa

机构信息

Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA.

出版信息

Hand Ther. 2024 Jun;29(2):68-74. doi: 10.1177/17589983231223868. Epub 2024 Jan 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Handgrip strength is crucial for overall health and is often evaluated using hand dynamometers. Two hand dynamometers were used in the study: the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer and Squegg™ Smart Dynamometer and Handgrip Trainer, which is a relatively new, Bluetooth-enabled device to measure handgrip strength. The purpose of the study was to compare Jamar and Squegg to determine concurrent validity and, separately, test-retest reliability of Squegg.

METHODS

The cross-sectional study measured bimanual handgrip strength using the Jamar and Squegg in two sessions, following standard protocols. Participants were 18+ years old, with no hand disease or dysfunction. Spearman's rank correlations were used to evaluate concurrent validity between Jamar and Squegg. Test-retest reliability was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates and 95% confidence intervals calculated using a mean-rating ( = 2) absolute agreement, 2-way mixed effects model.

RESULTS

Data from 594 participants were used to evaluate concurrent validity. Moderately strong correlations between Jamar and Squegg values for the right hand (RH) (ρ = 0.670; = .001) and Jamar and Squegg values for the left hand (LH) (ρ = 0.730; = .001) were found, indicating 'good' concurrent validity. Test-retest reliability for Squegg ranged from good to excellent (RH, ICC = 0.911, 95% CI (0.895, 0.924), = .001; LH, ICC = 0.928, 95% CI (0.915, 0.939), = .001).

DISCUSSION

The Squegg demonstrated good concurrent validity with Jamar and good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. It can be recommended as an alternative to the Jamar as a handgrip strength measurement tool. Squegg, which uses Bluetooth technology, is a reliable and cost-effective option for consistent handgrip strength testing.

摘要

引言

握力对整体健康至关重要,通常使用握力计进行评估。本研究使用了两种握力计:Jamar®液压握力计和Squegg™智能握力计及握力训练器,后者是一种相对较新的、支持蓝牙的测量握力的设备。本研究的目的是比较Jamar和Squegg,以确定同时效度,并分别测试Squegg的重测信度。

方法

这项横断面研究按照标准方案,分两个阶段使用Jamar和Squegg测量双侧握力。参与者年龄在18岁及以上,无手部疾病或功能障碍。使用Spearman等级相关性来评估Jamar和Squegg之间的同时效度。使用组内相关系数(ICC)估计值和95%置信区间评估重测信度,置信区间使用平均评分(=2)绝对一致性、双向混合效应模型计算。

结果

594名参与者的数据用于评估同时效度。发现右手(RH)的Jamar和Squegg值之间存在中度强相关性(ρ = 0.670;=0.001),左手(LH)的Jamar和Squegg值之间存在中度强相关性(ρ = 0.730;=0.001),表明具有“良好”的同时效度。Squegg的重测信度从良好到优秀不等(右手,ICC = 0.911,95%CI(0.895,0.924),=0.001;左手,ICC = 0.928,95%CI(0.915,0.939),=0.001)。

讨论

Squegg与Jamar表现出良好的同时效度,重测信度良好到优秀。它可以作为Jamar的替代品,推荐作为握力测量工具。使用蓝牙技术的Squegg是进行一致握力测试的可靠且经济高效的选择。

相似文献

2
Validity and reliability of Squegg device in measuring isometric handgrip strength.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Nov;27(21):10247-10254. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202311_34300.
7
Reliability and Validity of Shoulder and Handgrip Strength Testing.
Physiother Can. 2023 Feb 8;75(1):65-71. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2021-0041. eCollection 2023 Winter.
9
Validity and reliability of handgrip dynamometry in older adults: A comparison of two widely used dynamometers.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 21;17(6):e0270132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270132. eCollection 2022.
10
Reliability and validity of the K-force grip dynamometer in healthy subjects: do we need to assess it three times?
Hand Ther. 2023 Mar;28(1):33-39. doi: 10.1177/17589983231152958. Epub 2023 Feb 20.

本文引用的文献

2
Grip Strength: An Indispensable Biomarker For Older Adults.
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Oct 1;14:1681-1691. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S194543. eCollection 2019.
3
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
4
A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach.
Age Ageing. 2011 Jul;40(4):423-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr051. Epub 2011 May 30.
5
Grip force and pinch grip in an adult population: reference values and factors associated with grip force.
Scand J Occup Ther. 2012 May;19(3):288-96. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2011.553687. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
6
Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Dec 1;65(23):2276-84. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070364.
8
Reliability and validity of the DynEx dynamometer.
J Hand Ther. 2005 Jul-Sep;18(3):339-47. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.04.002.
9
Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength.
Occup Ther Int. 2002;9(3):201-9. doi: 10.1002/oti.165.
10
Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for hand strength.
J Rehabil Med. 2001 Jan;33(1):36-41. doi: 10.1080/165019701300006524.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验