Amin Zarmina, Gutierrez Galilea, True Larissa
Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA.
Hand Ther. 2024 Jun;29(2):68-74. doi: 10.1177/17589983231223868. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
Handgrip strength is crucial for overall health and is often evaluated using hand dynamometers. Two hand dynamometers were used in the study: the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer and Squegg™ Smart Dynamometer and Handgrip Trainer, which is a relatively new, Bluetooth-enabled device to measure handgrip strength. The purpose of the study was to compare Jamar and Squegg to determine concurrent validity and, separately, test-retest reliability of Squegg.
The cross-sectional study measured bimanual handgrip strength using the Jamar and Squegg in two sessions, following standard protocols. Participants were 18+ years old, with no hand disease or dysfunction. Spearman's rank correlations were used to evaluate concurrent validity between Jamar and Squegg. Test-retest reliability was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates and 95% confidence intervals calculated using a mean-rating ( = 2) absolute agreement, 2-way mixed effects model.
Data from 594 participants were used to evaluate concurrent validity. Moderately strong correlations between Jamar and Squegg values for the right hand (RH) (ρ = 0.670; = .001) and Jamar and Squegg values for the left hand (LH) (ρ = 0.730; = .001) were found, indicating 'good' concurrent validity. Test-retest reliability for Squegg ranged from good to excellent (RH, ICC = 0.911, 95% CI (0.895, 0.924), = .001; LH, ICC = 0.928, 95% CI (0.915, 0.939), = .001).
The Squegg demonstrated good concurrent validity with Jamar and good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. It can be recommended as an alternative to the Jamar as a handgrip strength measurement tool. Squegg, which uses Bluetooth technology, is a reliable and cost-effective option for consistent handgrip strength testing.
握力对整体健康至关重要,通常使用握力计进行评估。本研究使用了两种握力计:Jamar®液压握力计和Squegg™智能握力计及握力训练器,后者是一种相对较新的、支持蓝牙的测量握力的设备。本研究的目的是比较Jamar和Squegg,以确定同时效度,并分别测试Squegg的重测信度。
这项横断面研究按照标准方案,分两个阶段使用Jamar和Squegg测量双侧握力。参与者年龄在18岁及以上,无手部疾病或功能障碍。使用Spearman等级相关性来评估Jamar和Squegg之间的同时效度。使用组内相关系数(ICC)估计值和95%置信区间评估重测信度,置信区间使用平均评分(=2)绝对一致性、双向混合效应模型计算。
594名参与者的数据用于评估同时效度。发现右手(RH)的Jamar和Squegg值之间存在中度强相关性(ρ = 0.670;=0.001),左手(LH)的Jamar和Squegg值之间存在中度强相关性(ρ = 0.730;=0.001),表明具有“良好”的同时效度。Squegg的重测信度从良好到优秀不等(右手,ICC = 0.911,95%CI(0.895,0.924),=0.001;左手,ICC = 0.928,95%CI(0.915,0.939),=0.001)。
Squegg与Jamar表现出良好的同时效度,重测信度良好到优秀。它可以作为Jamar的替代品,推荐作为握力测量工具。使用蓝牙技术的Squegg是进行一致握力测试的可靠且经济高效的选择。