Academic Geriatric Medicine, University of Southampton, UK.
Age Ageing. 2011 Jul;40(4):423-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr051. Epub 2011 May 30.
the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People has developed a clinical definition of sarcopenia based on low muscle mass and reduced muscle function (strength or performance). Grip strength is recommended as a good simple measure of muscle strength when 'measured in standard conditions'. However, standard conditions remain to be defined.
a literature search was conducted to review articles describing the measurement of grip strength listed in Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases up to 31 December 2009.
there is wide variability in the choice of equipment and protocol for measuring grip strength. The Jamar hand dynamometer is the most widely used instrument with established test-retest, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. However, there is considerable variation in how it is used and studies often provide insufficient information on the protocol followed making comparisons difficult. There is evidence that variation in approach can affect the values recorded. Furthermore, reported summary measures of grip strength vary widely including maximum or mean value, from one, two or three attempts, with either hand or the dominant hand alone.
there is considerable variation in current methods of assessing grip strength which makes comparison between studies difficult. A standardised method would enable more consistent measurement of grip strength and better assessment of sarcopenia. Our approach is described.
欧洲老年人肌肉减少症工作组基于低肌肉量和肌肉功能(力量或性能)下降制定了肌肉减少症的临床定义。当“在标准条件下测量”时,握力被推荐为测量肌肉力量的一种简单方法。然而,标准条件仍有待确定。
对截至 2009 年 12 月 31 日在 Medline、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中描述握力测量的文章进行了文献检索。
测量握力的设备和方案选择存在很大差异。Jamar 握力计是应用最广泛的仪器,具有良好的测试-再测试、评定者间和评定者内可靠性。然而,它的使用方法存在很大差异,并且研究往往提供了关于所遵循方案的信息不足,这使得比较变得困难。有证据表明,方法的差异会影响记录的值。此外,报告的握力综合指标差异很大,包括最大值或平均值,单次、两次或三次测量,使用单手或优势手。
目前评估握力的方法存在很大差异,这使得研究之间的比较变得困难。标准化的方法将能够更一致地测量握力并更好地评估肌肉减少症。我们的方法已被描述。