• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你如何知道自己是否走神了?将偏离任务思维的显性记忆与注意力不集中的主观感受区分开来。

How Do You Know If You Were Mind Wandering? Dissociating Explicit Memories of Off Task Thought From Subjective Feelings of Inattention.

作者信息

Mathews Nathan K, Bin Faiz Umer, Brosowsky Nicholaus P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

出版信息

Open Mind (Camb). 2024 May 10;8:666-687. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00142. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1162/opmi_a_00142
PMID:38828433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11142633/
Abstract

Mind wandering is a common experience in which your attention drifts away from the task at hand and toward task-unrelated thoughts. To measure mind wandering we typically use experience sampling and retrospective self-reports, which require participants to make metacognitive judgments about their immediately preceding attentional states. In the current study, we aimed to better understand how people come to make such judgments by introducing a novel distinction between explicit memories of off task thought and subjective feelings of inattention. Across two preregistered experiments, we found that participants often indicated they were "off task" and yet had no memory of the content of their thoughts-though, they were less common than remembered experiences. Critically, remembered experiences of mind wandering and subjective feelings of inattention differed in their behavioral correlates. In Experiment 1, we found that only the frequency of remembered mind wandering varied with task demands. In contrast, only subjective feelings of inattention were associated with poor performance (Experiments 1 and 2) and individual differences in executive functioning (Experiment 2). These results suggest that the phenomenology of mind wandering may differ depending on how the experiences are brought about (e.g., executive functioning errors versus excess attentional resources), and provide preliminary evidence of the importance of measuring subjective feelings of inattention when assessing mind wandering.

摘要

思维游走是一种常见的体验,在此过程中,你的注意力会从手头的任务上转移,转向与任务无关的想法。为了测量思维游走,我们通常使用经验抽样法和回顾性自我报告,这要求参与者对他们之前的注意力状态做出元认知判断。在当前的研究中,我们旨在通过引入任务外思维的显性记忆和注意力不集中的主观感受之间的新区别,更好地理解人们是如何做出这种判断的。在两项预先注册的实验中,我们发现参与者经常表示他们“走神了”,但却对自己想法的内容没有记忆——不过,这种情况比有记忆的经历要少见。至关重要的是,思维游走的记忆经历和注意力不集中的主观感受在行为相关性上有所不同。在实验1中,我们发现只有记忆中的思维游走频率会随任务要求而变化。相比之下,只有注意力不集中的主观感受与表现不佳(实验1和2)以及执行功能的个体差异(实验2)有关。这些结果表明,思维游走的现象学可能因经历产生的方式而异(例如,执行功能错误与注意力资源过剩),并为在评估思维游走时测量注意力不集中的主观感受的重要性提供了初步证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ea/11142633/240157ab8305/opmi-08-666-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ea/11142633/bdf74ef8b8f8/opmi-08-666-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ea/11142633/147e87d12300/opmi-08-666-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ea/11142633/240157ab8305/opmi-08-666-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ea/11142633/bdf74ef8b8f8/opmi-08-666-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ea/11142633/147e87d12300/opmi-08-666-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ea/11142633/240157ab8305/opmi-08-666-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
How Do You Know If You Were Mind Wandering? Dissociating Explicit Memories of Off Task Thought From Subjective Feelings of Inattention.你如何知道自己是否走神了?将偏离任务思维的显性记忆与注意力不集中的主观感受区分开来。
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 May 10;8:666-687. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00142. eCollection 2024.
2
Mind wandering and executive dysfunction predict children's performance in the metronome response task.注意力不集中和执行功能障碍可预测儿童在节拍器反应任务中的表现。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Jan;213:105257. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105257. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
3
Listen up, kids! How mind wandering affects immediate and delayed memory in children.听好了,孩子们!心流对儿童即时记忆和延迟记忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 May;52(4):909-925. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01509-0. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
4
Absence without leave or leave without absence: Examining the interrelations among mind wandering, metacognition and cognitive control.擅离职守还是身在曹营心在汉:探究走神、元认知与认知控制之间的相互关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 9;13(2):e0191639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191639. eCollection 2018.
5
Dissociating the freely-moving thought dimension of mind-wandering from the intentionality and task-unrelated thought dimensions.将游离思维的自由移动维度与意向性和任务无关的思维维度区分开来。
Psychol Res. 2021 Oct;85(7):2599-2609. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01419-9. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
6
Attention need not always apply: Mind wandering impedes explicit but not implicit sequence learning.注意不一定总是适用:心流阻碍了显式但不阻碍内隐序列学习。
Cognition. 2021 Apr;209:104530. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104530. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
7
Mind wandering during attention performance: Effects of ADHD-inattention symptomatology, negative mood, ruminative response style and working memory capacity.注意力任务执行期间的走神:注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)注意力不集中症状、消极情绪、反刍反应方式及工作记忆容量的影响
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0181213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181213. eCollection 2017.
8
Examining the effect of expected test format and test difficulty on the frequency and mnemonic costs of mind wandering.考察预期测试格式和测试难度对思维漫游频率和助记成本的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 May;77(5):1068-1092. doi: 10.1177/17470218231187892. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
9
Model-based Mind Wandering in Older Adults: Age Differences in the Behavioral and Electrophysiological Correlates of Subjective and Objective Measures of Mind Wandering.基于模型的老年人思维漫游:主观和客观思维漫游测量指标的行为和电生理相关性的年龄差异。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Sep 1;36(9):2029-2044. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02195.
10
The influence of time on task on mind wandering and visual working memory.时间对任务的影响与思维漫游和视觉工作记忆。
Cognition. 2017 Dec;169:84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective attention: Examining temporally specific retrospective reports of mind wandering and engagement during online video lectures.回顾性注意力:审视在线视频讲座期间思维游走和专注度的特定时间回顾性报告。
Psychol Res. 2025 May 27;89(3):103. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02133-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Fixation, flexibility, and creativity: The dynamics of mind wandering.专注、灵活与创新:心流的动态变化。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Jul;48(7):689-710. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001012. Epub 2022 May 19.
2
A "Goldilocks zone" for mind-wandering reports? A secondary data analysis of how few thought probes are enough for reliable and valid measurement.思维漫游报告的“金发姑娘区”?关于需要多少思维探测才能进行可靠有效的测量的二次数据分析。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jan;55(1):327-347. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01766-4. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
3
Thought dynamics under task demands: Evaluating the influence of task difficulty on unconstrained thought.
任务需求下的思维动态:评估任务难度对自由思维的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Sep;47(9):1298-1312. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000944.
4
The effects of real-time performance feedback and performance emphasis on the sustained attention to response task (SART).实时性能反馈和绩效强调对持续注意反应任务(SART)的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):1972-1979. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01602-6. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
5
Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports.检验探测性思维漫游报告的竞争测量方法的构念效度。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Dec;53(6):2372-2411. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01557-x. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
6
Attention need not always apply: Mind wandering impedes explicit but not implicit sequence learning.注意不一定总是适用:心流阻碍了显式但不阻碍内隐序列学习。
Cognition. 2021 Apr;209:104530. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104530. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
7
The metronome response task for measuring mind wandering: Replication attempt and extension of three studies by Seli et al.用于测量思维漫游的节拍器反应任务:对 Seli 等人的三项研究的重复尝试和扩展
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jan;83(1):315-330. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02131-x.
8
Is there a G factor for metacognition? Correlations in retrospective metacognitive sensitivity across tasks.元认知是否存在 G 因素?跨任务回溯性元认知敏感性的相关性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Sep;149(9):1788-1799. doi: 10.1037/xge0000746. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
A multi-faceted approach to understanding individual differences in mind-wandering.一种理解走神个体差异的多方面方法。
Cognition. 2020 May;198:104078. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104078. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
10
Frequency effects on memory: A resource-limited theory.记忆的频率效应:一种资源限制理论。
Psychol Rev. 2020 Jan;127(1):1-46. doi: 10.1037/rev0000161. Epub 2019 Sep 16.