Suppr超能文献

粉末空气抛光在种植体周围疾病非手术治疗中的临床疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

The clinical efficacy of powder air-polishing in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implant diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Huang Nengwen, Li Yang, Chen Huachen, Li Wen, Wang Chengchaozi, Ou YanJing, Iikubo Masahiro, Chen Jiang

机构信息

School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Fujian Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2024 Dec;60:163-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 May 22.

Abstract

Peri-implant diseases, characterized by inflammatory conditions affecting peri-implant tissues, encompass peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Peri-implant mucositis is an inflammatory lesion limited to the mucosa around an implant, while peri-implantitis extends from the mucosa to the supporting bone, causing a loss of osseointegration. For non-surgical treatments, we tested the null hypothesis that the presence or absence of air-polishing made no difference. The study focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing air-polishing with mechanical or ultrasonic debridement, evaluating outcomes such as bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), plaque index/plaque score (PI/PS), clinical attachment level (CAL), bone loss, and mucosal recession (MR). Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction and quality assessments, considering short-term (<6 months) and long-term (≥6 months) follow-up periods. After screening, ten articles were included in the meta-analysis. In nonsurgical peri-implant disease management, air-polishing moderately mitigated short-term PI/PS for peri-implant mucositis and showed a similar improvement in long-term BOP and bone loss for peri-implantitis compared to the control group. The Egger test found no evidence of publication bias except for the long-term PI/PS of peri-implant mucositis. Leave-one-out analysis confirmed the stability of the results. The findings highlight the need for future research with longer-term follow-up and high-quality, multi-center, large-sample RCTs.

摘要

种植体周围疾病以影响种植体周围组织的炎症状态为特征,包括种植体周围黏膜炎和种植体周围炎。种植体周围黏膜炎是一种局限于种植体周围黏膜的炎性病变,而种植体周围炎则从黏膜扩展至支持骨,导致骨结合丧失。对于非手术治疗,我们检验了零假设,即是否进行空气抛光并无差异。该研究聚焦于比较空气抛光与机械或超声清创术的随机对照试验(RCT),评估诸如探诊出血(BOP)、探诊深度(PD)、菌斑指数/菌斑评分(PI/PS)、临床附着水平(CAL)、骨丧失和黏膜退缩(MR)等结果。两名独立的评审员进行了数据提取和质量评估,同时考虑了短期(<6个月)和长期(≥6个月)随访期。筛选后,十篇文章被纳入荟萃分析。在非手术种植体周围疾病管理中,与对照组相比,空气抛光适度减轻了种植体周围黏膜炎的短期PI/PS,并在种植体周围炎的长期BOP和骨丧失方面显示出类似的改善。除了种植体周围黏膜炎的长期PI/PS外,Egger检验未发现发表偏倚的证据。逐一剔除分析证实了结果的稳定性。研究结果凸显了未来进行长期随访以及高质量、多中心、大样本RCT研究的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44b0/11141045/6facac3d7d8a/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验