• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

父母在医疗决策中的自主权限制:儿科干预原则趋于一致。

Limits on Parental Discretion in Medical Decision-Making: pediatric intervention principles converge.

出版信息

Perspect Biol Med. 2024;67(2):277-289. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2024.a929023.

DOI:10.1353/pbm.2024.a929023
PMID:38828604
Abstract

Pediatric intervention principles help clinicians and health-care institutions determine appropriate responses when parents' medical decisions place children at risk. Several intervention principles have been proposed and defended in the pediatric ethics literature. These principles may appear to provide conflicting guidance, but much of that conflict is superficial. First, seemingly different pediatric intervention principles sometimes converge on the same guidance. Second, these principles often aim to solve different problems in pediatrics or to operate in different background conditions. The potential for convergence between intervention principles-or at least an absence of conflict between them-matters for both the theory and practice of pediatric ethics. This article builds on the recent work of a diverse group of pediatric ethicists tasked with identifying consensus guidelines for pediatric decision-making.

摘要

儿科干预原则帮助临床医生和医疗机构在父母的医疗决策使儿童面临风险时确定适当的应对措施。在儿科伦理学文献中提出并辩护了几个干预原则。这些原则似乎提供了相互冲突的指导,但其中许多冲突是表面的。首先,看似不同的儿科干预原则有时会得出相同的指导。其次,这些原则通常旨在解决儿科中的不同问题,或者在不同的背景条件下运作。干预原则之间的趋同可能性——或者至少它们之间不存在冲突——对儿科伦理学的理论和实践都很重要。本文建立在最近一项由一群不同的儿科伦理学家进行的工作的基础上,他们的任务是为儿科决策制定确定共识指南。

相似文献

1
Limits on Parental Discretion in Medical Decision-Making: pediatric intervention principles converge.父母在医疗决策中的自主权限制:儿科干预原则趋于一致。
Perspect Biol Med. 2024;67(2):277-289. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2024.a929023.
2
Guidance and Intervention Principles in Pediatrics: The Need for Pluralism.儿科指导与干预原则:多元化的必要性。
J Clin Ethics. 2019 Fall;30(3):201-206.
3
Pediatric Decision-Making: ethical aspects specific to neonates.儿科决策:新生儿特有的伦理问题。
Perspect Biol Med. 2024;67(2):209-226. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2024.a929019.
4
Better than Best (Interest Standard) in Pediatric Decision Making.儿科决策中的“优于最佳(利益标准)”
J Clin Ethics. 2019 Fall;30(3):183-195.
5
Ethics consultation in pediatrics: long-term experience from a pediatric oncology center.儿科伦理咨询:来自一家儿科肿瘤中心的长期经验
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(5):3-17. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1021965.
6
In Further Defense of "Better than Best (Interest)".对“优于最佳(利益)”的进一步辩护
J Clin Ethics. 2019 Fall;30(3):232-239.
7
Ethical issues at the interface of clinical care and research practice in pediatric oncology: a narrative review of parents' and physicians' experiences.儿科肿瘤临床护理与研究实践交叉点的伦理问题:对父母和医生经验的叙述性综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2011 Sep 27;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-12-18.
8
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
9
Pediatric Decision Making: Ross, Rawls, and Getting Children and Families Right.儿科决策:罗斯、罗尔斯与正确对待儿童及家庭
J Clin Ethics. 2019 Fall;30(3):240-246.
10
Decision-Making for Children with Disabilities: Parental Discretion and Moral Ambiguity.残疾儿童的决策:父母的自由裁量权与道德模糊性
Perspect Biol Med. 2016;58(3):328-31. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2016.0007.