• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学生对医疗保险和医疗补助计划中医生欺诈与滥用行为的态度。

Medical students' attitudes on physician fraud and abuse in the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

作者信息

Keenan C E, Brown G C, Pontell H N, Geis G

出版信息

J Med Educ. 1985 Mar;60(3):167-73. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198503000-00002.

DOI:10.1097/00001888-198503000-00002
PMID:3882968
Abstract

The authors in this paper report the findings of a survey of medical students at the University of California, Irvine, California College of Medicine regarding their views on the Medicare and Medicaid programs and on the problem of fraud and abuse in these government medical benefit programs. The students were asked their views on four issues: (a) the quality of various aspects of Medicare and Medicaid; (b) the seriousness and prevalence of physician fraud and abuse in the programs; (c) the punishment that should be given to violators; and (d) the causes and prevention of fraud and abuse in Medicare and Medicaid. They viewed fraud and abuse as serious but not as being widespread. They believed that physicians who violate program regulations are not likely to be punished by official agencies. They favored moderate penalties for violations. Explanations offered by the students for fraud and abuse focused on physicians' attitudes and motivations as well as on the structure of the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

摘要

本文的作者报告了一项针对加利福尼亚大学欧文分校医学院医学生的调查结果,该调查涉及他们对医疗保险和医疗补助计划的看法,以及对这些政府医疗福利计划中的欺诈和滥用问题的看法。学生们被问及他们对四个问题的看法:(a)医疗保险和医疗补助计划各方面的质量;(b)这些计划中医生欺诈和滥用行为的严重性和普遍性;(c)应该给予违规者的惩罚;(d)医疗保险和医疗补助计划中欺诈和滥用行为的原因及预防措施。他们认为欺诈和滥用行为很严重,但并不普遍。他们认为违反计划规定的医生不太可能受到官方机构的惩罚。他们赞成对违规行为处以适度的惩罚。学生们对欺诈和滥用行为给出的解释集中在医生的态度和动机以及医疗保险和医疗补助计划的结构上。

相似文献

1
Medical students' attitudes on physician fraud and abuse in the Medicare and Medicaid programs.医学生对医疗保险和医疗补助计划中医生欺诈与滥用行为的态度。
J Med Educ. 1985 Mar;60(3):167-73. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198503000-00002.
2
Fraud and abuse of government medical benefit programs by psychiatrists.精神科医生对政府医疗福利项目的欺诈与滥用行为。
Am J Psychiatry. 1985 Feb;142(2):231-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.142.2.231.
3
Medicaid/Medicare fraud and abuse: practical guidelines for physicians.
Med Staff Couns. 1987 Fall;1(2):45-52.
4
Control of fraud and abuse in Medicare and Medicaid.医疗保险和医疗补助中欺诈与滥用行为的管控。
Am J Law Med. 1977 Fall;3(3):323-32.
5
Medicare and Medicaid programs; suspension of health care professionals for conviction of program-related crimes--HCFA. Final regulations with comment period.医疗保险和医疗补助计划;因与计划相关罪行被定罪而暂停医疗保健专业人员资格——医疗保健财务管理局。有意见征求期的最终规定。
Fed Regist. 1983 Jan 27;48(19):3742-58.
6
A demographic portrait of physicians sanctioned by the federal government for fraud and abuse against Medicare and Medicaid.一份关于因欺诈和滥用医疗保险及医疗补助计划而受到联邦政府制裁的医生的人口统计学画像。
Med Care. 1985 Aug;23(8):1028-31. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198508000-00010.
7
Physician recruitment programs--fraud and abuse, tax, and antitrust considerations.
Med Staff Couns. 1988 Summer;2(3):37-48.
8
Medicare fraud and abuse: implications for physicians.
J Med Pract Manage. 1988 Spring;3(4):278-85.
9
Collateral sanctions for criminal convictions in the Medicare and Medicaid programs.医疗保险和医疗补助计划中刑事定罪的附加制裁措施。
Med Staff Couns. 1990 Summer;4(3):53-9.
10
Characteristics of Physicians Excluded From US Medicare and State Public Insurance Programs for Fraud, Health Crimes, or Unlawful Prescribing of Controlled Substances.因欺诈、医疗犯罪或非法开具受控物质而被美国医疗保险和州公共保险计划排除在外的医生的特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185805. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5805.

引用本文的文献

1
Rural residents' willingness to participate in basic medical insurance and influential factors: A survey of three provinces in China.农村居民参加基本医疗保险的意愿及影响因素:对中国三省的调查。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 10;10:1037763. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1037763. eCollection 2022.