• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因欺诈、医疗犯罪或非法开具受控物质而被美国医疗保险和州公共保险计划排除在外的医生的特征。

Characteristics of Physicians Excluded From US Medicare and State Public Insurance Programs for Fraud, Health Crimes, or Unlawful Prescribing of Controlled Substances.

机构信息

Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185805. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5805.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5805
PMID:30646294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6324355/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Each year, billions of dollars are wasted owing to health care fraud, waste, and abuse. Efforts to detect fraud have been increasing, yet we have little information about physicians who have been excluded from Medicare and state public insurance programs for fraud, health crimes, or the unlawful prescribing of controlled substances.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the characteristics of physicians excluded from Medicare and state public insurance programs for fraud, health crimes, or unlawful prescribing of controlled substances.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study considered all physicians excluded from Medicare and state public insurance programs between 2007 and 2017. The study matched exclusion data to a comprehensive, cross-sectional database of US physicians assembled by Doximity, an online networking service for US physicians. The share of physicians excluded in each state was examined and linear trends of exclusions over time were estimated. Using physician-level multivariable logistic regression models, exclusions (binary variable) were assessed as a function of physician characteristics.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Exclusions for fraud, health crimes (defined legally as criminal penalties for acts involving federal health care programs), and substance abuse; and physician characteristics, including age, sex, allopathic vs osteopathic degree, medical school attended, ranking of that medical school, medical school faculty affiliation, practice state, practice location, and specialty.

RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2017, 2222 physicians (0.29%) were temporarily or permanently excluded from Medicare and state public insurance programs. Fraud, health crimes, and substance abuse exclusions increased, on average, 20% per year (equivalent to 48 [95% CI, 40.4-56.0] convictions/year from a base of 236 convictions in 2007 to 670 convictions in 2017 [an increase of approximately 200% from 2007 to 2017]). Exclusion rates were highest in the West and Southeast. West Virginia had the highest exclusion rate, with 5.77 exclusions per 1000 physicians (32 exclusions among 5720 physicians), while Montana had 0 exclusions during this period. Male physicians, physicians with osteopathic training, older physicians, and physicians in specific specialties (eg, family medicine, psychiatry, internal medicine, anesthesiology, surgery, and obstetrics/gynecology) were more likely to be excluded.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The number of physicians excluded from participation in Medicare and state public insurance reimbursement owing to fraud, waste, and abuse increased between 2007 and 2017. Several physician characteristics, including being a male, older age, and osteopathic training, were significantly and positively associated with exclusion. Our results highlight the potential value of using physician characteristics in conjunction with information on medical claims filed by physicians to help identify adverse physician behavior.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca1/6324355/9122acfdc455/jamanetwopen-1-e185805-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca1/6324355/c5a73e6d3b41/jamanetwopen-1-e185805-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca1/6324355/9122acfdc455/jamanetwopen-1-e185805-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca1/6324355/c5a73e6d3b41/jamanetwopen-1-e185805-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca1/6324355/9122acfdc455/jamanetwopen-1-e185805-g002.jpg
摘要

重要性

由于医疗保健欺诈、浪费和滥用,每年浪费数十亿美元。尽管我们一直在努力加强对欺诈行为的检测,但对于因欺诈、医疗犯罪或非法开具受控物质而被排除在联邦医疗保险和州公共保险计划之外的医生,我们知之甚少。

目的

研究因欺诈、医疗犯罪或非法开具受控物质而被排除在联邦医疗保险和州公共保险计划之外的医生的特征。

设计、地点和参与者:本横断面研究考虑了 2007 年至 2017 年间所有被排除在联邦医疗保险和州公共保险计划之外的医生。该研究将排除数据与 Doximity 汇编的美国医生综合、横断面数据库进行了匹配,Doximity 是一个面向美国医生的在线网络服务。研究人员检查了每个州的医生被排除的比例,并估计了随时间推移的排除趋势。使用医生层面的多变量逻辑回归模型,将排除(二进制变量)作为医生特征的函数进行评估。

主要结果和措施

欺诈、医疗犯罪(定义为涉及联邦医疗保健计划的行为的刑事处罚)和药物滥用的排除;以及医生特征,包括年龄、性别、整骨疗法与非整骨疗法学位、就读的医学院、该医学院的排名、医学院教师隶属关系、执业州、执业地点和专业。

结果

2007 年至 2017 年间,有 2222 名(0.29%)医生被暂时或永久排除在联邦医疗保险和州公共保险计划之外。欺诈、医疗犯罪和药物滥用的排除率平均每年增加 20%(相当于 2007 年 236 例定罪基础上每年增加 48 例[95%CI,40.4-56.0]定罪),2017 年达到 670 例定罪[2007 年至 2017 年增加约 200%])。西部和东南部的排除率最高。西弗吉尼亚州的排除率最高,每 1000 名医生中有 5.77 名被排除(在 5720 名医生中有 32 名被排除),而蒙大拿州在此期间没有被排除。男性医生、接受整骨疗法培训的医生、年龄较大的医生以及特定专业(如家庭医学、精神病学、内科、麻醉学、外科和妇产科)的医生更有可能被排除。

结论和相关性

由于欺诈、浪费和滥用,2007 年至 2017 年间被排除参与联邦医疗保险和州公共保险报销的医生人数有所增加。一些医生特征,包括男性、年龄较大和接受整骨疗法培训,与排除有显著正相关。我们的研究结果突出表明,在使用医生特征的同时结合医生提交的医疗索赔信息,有助于识别不良医生行为。

相似文献

1
Characteristics of Physicians Excluded From US Medicare and State Public Insurance Programs for Fraud, Health Crimes, or Unlawful Prescribing of Controlled Substances.因欺诈、医疗犯罪或非法开具受控物质而被美国医疗保险和州公共保险计划排除在外的医生的特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185805. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5805.
2
Association Between Treatment by Fraud and Abuse Perpetrators and Health Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries.欺诈和滥用药行为者的治疗与医疗保险受益人健康结果之间的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jan 1;180(1):62-69. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4771.
3
Interventional pain management at crossroads: the perfect storm brewing for a new decade of challenges.介入性疼痛管理正处于十字路口:酝酿着新十年挑战的完美风暴。
Pain Physician. 2010 Mar-Apr;13(2):E111-40.
4
The Current State of Opioid Prescribing and Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Action Against Physicians: An Analysis of DEA Database 2004-2017.阿片类药物处方和美国缉毒局(DEA)针对医生的行动现状:对 2004-2017 年 DEA 数据库的分析。
Pain Physician. 2020 Jun;23(3):E297-E304.
5
Improving Fraud and Abuse Detection in General Physician Claims: A Data Mining Study.提高普通内科医生索赔中的欺诈和滥用检测:一项数据挖掘研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Nov 10;5(3):165-72. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.196.
6
Collateral sanctions for criminal convictions in the Medicare and Medicaid programs.医疗保险和医疗补助计划中刑事定罪的附加制裁措施。
Med Staff Couns. 1990 Summer;4(3):53-9.
7
The reasonable and necessary criterion and Medicare contractor review of claims: efforts to combat fraud, waste and abuse in the Medicare program.医疗保险索赔的合理必要标准及医疗保险承办商审查:打击医疗保险计划中的欺诈、浪费和滥用行为的努力。
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law. 2000 Feb(251):9-18.
8
Physician refer thyself: is Stark II, phase III the final voyage?医生自荐:《斯塔克 II》第三阶段是最后一程吗?
Pain Physician. 2007 Nov;10(6):725-41.
9
Controlled Substance Prescribing Patterns--Prescription Behavior Surveillance System, Eight States, 2013.受控物质处方模式 - 处方行为监测系统,八个州,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Oct 16;64(9):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6409a1.
10
Practitioner fraud and abuse: a public policy status report.从业者欺诈与滥用行为:一份公共政策现状报告。
J Health Hum Resour Adm. 1987 Spring;9(4):470-86.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Outcomes for Patients Treated by Allopathic vs Osteopathic Surgeons.对抗疗法外科医生与整骨疗法外科医生治疗患者的结果比较。
JAMA Surg. 2025 Jan 1;160(1):37-44. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4580.
2
Insider Threats to the Military Health System: A Systematic Background Check of TRICARE West Providers.军事医疗系统面临的内部威胁:对西部地区军事医疗保健计划(TRICARE West)提供者的系统背景调查。
JMIRx Med. 2024 Apr 9;5:e52198. doi: 10.2196/52198.
3
Incidence of moral hazards among health care providers in the implementation of social health insurance toward universal health coverage: evidence from rural province hospitals in Indonesia.

本文引用的文献

1
Physicians' political preferences and the delivery of end of life care in the United States: retrospective observational study.医生的政治倾向与美国的临终关怀服务提供:回顾性观察研究。
BMJ. 2018 Apr 11;361:k1161. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1161.
2
Physician age and outcomes in elderly patients in hospital in the US: observational study.美国住院老年患者的医生年龄与治疗结果:观察性研究
BMJ. 2017 May 16;357:j1797. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1797.
3
Quality of care delivered by general internists in US hospitals who graduated from foreign versus US medical schools: observational study.
社会医疗保险实施过程中医疗服务提供者道德风险的发生率:来自印度尼西亚农村省级医院的证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 17;11:1147709. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1147709. eCollection 2023.
4
Perceptions of the benefits of the basic medical insurance system among the insured: a mixed methods research of a northern city in China.参保人员对基本医疗保险制度获益感知的混合研究:来自中国北方某市的研究
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 17;11:1043153. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1043153. eCollection 2023.
5
Fraud Claims Filed Involving Practicing Ophthalmologists from 1985 Through 2020.1985年至2020年期间针对执业眼科医生的欺诈指控
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 24;17:341-350. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S397014. eCollection 2023.
美国医院中毕业于外国医学院与美国医学院的普通内科医生所提供的医疗服务质量:观察性研究。
BMJ. 2017 Feb 2;356:j273. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j273.
4
Sex Differences in Physician Salary in US Public Medical Schools.美国公立医学院校医生薪资的性别差异。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Sep 1;176(9):1294-304. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3284.
5
Sex Differences in Academic Rank in US Medical Schools in 2014.2014年美国医学院校学术排名中的性别差异。
JAMA. 2015 Sep 15;314(11):1149-58. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10680.
6
Eliminating waste in US health care.消除美国医疗保健中的浪费。
JAMA. 2012 Apr 11;307(14):1513-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.362. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
7
Malpractice risk according to physician specialty.根据医师专业划分的医疗事故风险。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 18;365(7):629-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1012370.
8
The ACA's new weapons against health care fraud.《平价医疗法案》打击医疗保健欺诈的新手段。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 22;363(4):304-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1007088. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
9
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《流行病学观察性研究报告强化(STROBE)声明》:观察性研究报告指南
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):573-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010.
10
Characteristics associated with physician discipline: a case-control study.与医师纪律处分相关的特征:一项病例对照研究。
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Mar 22;164(6):653-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.6.653.