Suppr超能文献

一日手术的随机临床试验。患者满意度、临床结果及成本。

Randomized clinical trial of one-day surgery. Patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and costs.

作者信息

Pineault R, Contandriopoulos A P, Valois M, Bastian M L, Lance J M

出版信息

Med Care. 1985 Feb;23(2):171-82. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198502000-00008.

Abstract

One hundred and eighty-two patients undergoing tubal ligation, hernia repair, or meniscectomy were randomly assigned to either one-day or inpatient surgery. The study's objective is to compare these two modes of care with regard to patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and costs of the episode of care. A significantly higher proportion of one-day patients than their hospitalized counterparts found their stay to be too short and would prefer hospitalization as an alternative. Clinical outcomes were comparable in both groups. One-day tubal ligation and hernia repair were found to be cost-efficient and averaged hospital savings of $86.00 and $115.00 more than inpatient care. Meniscectomy deviated from this trend in that treatment costs were significantly higher for one-day surgery patients. Analysis of personal and physician costs did not show any significant difference between the two modes of care.

摘要

182名接受输卵管结扎、疝气修补或半月板切除术的患者被随机分配接受日间手术或住院手术。该研究的目的是比较这两种护理模式在患者满意度、临床结果和护理费用方面的差异。与住院患者相比,日间手术患者中认为住院时间过短且更倾向于选择住院治疗的比例显著更高。两组的临床结果相当。研究发现,日间输卵管结扎和疝气修补手术具有成本效益,与住院治疗相比,平均可为医院节省86美元和115美元。半月板切除术则偏离了这一趋势,日间手术患者的治疗费用显著更高。对个人成本和医生成本的分析表明,两种护理模式之间没有显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验