Fiehler Jens, Ortega-Gutierrez Santiago, Anagnostakou Vania, Cortese Jonathan, Cekirge H Saruhan, Fiorella David, Hanel Ricardo, Kulcsar Zsolt, Lamin Saleh, Liu Jianmin, Lylyk Pedro, Marden Franklin A, Pereira Vitor M, Psychogios Marios-Nikos, Rice Hal, Rouchaud Aymeric, Saatci Isil, Siddiqui Adnan H, Spelle Laurent, Yang Pengfei, Grams Astrid, Gounis Matthew J
Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
Neurology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 May 22;17(6):632-639. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-021404.
Multiple studies and meta-analyses have described the technical and clinical outcomes in large cohorts of aneurysm patients treated with flow diverters (FDs). Variations in evaluation methodology complicate making comparisons among studies, hinder understanding of the device behavior, and pose an obstacle in the assessment of further advances in FD therapy.
A multidisciplinary panel of neurointerventionalists, imaging experts, and neuroradiologists convened with the goal of establishing consensus recommendations for the standardization of image analyses in FD studies.
A standardized methodology is proposed for evaluating and reporting radiological outcomes of FD treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The recommendations include general imaging considerations for clinical studies and evaluations of longitudinal changes, such as neointimal lining and stenosis. They cover standards for classification of aneurysm location, morphology, measurements, as well as the assessment of aneurysm occlusion, wall apposition, and neck coverage. These reporting standards further define four specific braid deformation patterns: foreshortening, fish-mouthing, braid bump deformation, and braid collapse, collectively termed 'F2B2'.
When widely applied, standardization of methods of measuring and reporting outcomes will help to harmonize the assessment of treatment outcomes in clinical studies, help facilitate communication of results among specialists, and help enable research and development to focus on specific aspects of FD techniques and technology.
多项研究和荟萃分析描述了使用血流导向装置(FD)治疗的大量动脉瘤患者的技术和临床结果。评估方法的差异使得研究之间的比较变得复杂,阻碍了对该装置行为的理解,并对FD治疗的进一步进展评估构成了障碍。
一个由神经介入专家、影像专家和神经放射学家组成的多学科小组召开会议,目的是就FD研究中图像分析的标准化建立共识性建议。
提出了一种标准化方法,用于评估和报告颅内动脉瘤FD治疗的放射学结果。这些建议包括临床研究的一般影像学考虑因素以及对纵向变化的评估,如新内膜内衬和狭窄。它们涵盖了动脉瘤位置、形态、测量的分类标准,以及动脉瘤闭塞、管壁贴合和瘤颈覆盖的评估。这些报告标准进一步定义了四种特定的编织物变形模式:缩短、鱼嘴状、编织物凸起变形和编织物塌陷,统称为“F2B2”。
当广泛应用时,测量和报告结果方法的标准化将有助于统一临床研究中治疗结果的评估,有助于促进专家之间的结果交流,并有助于使研发能够专注于FD技术和工艺的特定方面。