Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences, Maastricht University, Postal: P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jul;53(7):2489-2508. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02888-4. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
From the mid-seventeenth century, resorption of a testicular "ferment" and resorption of some part of the semen constituted reputable accounts of secondary sexual characteristics. Only in the early twentieth century was the latter, "recrementitious secretion" theory, explicitly considered superseded by one of internal secretion, an advance ushering in the hormone era. A reconstruction of these proto-endocrinological concepts is offered onward from the first, 1490 print edition of Galen's On Semen. Early modern physicians picking up from Galen deliberated widely on the medium and pathway of male and female testicular influences on "the entire body," including the mind, causing "femininity" and "masculinity" in physical, mental-temperamental, and behavioral terms. A switch is discernible from "heat and strength" (Galen) to blood-borne "virility" or testicular vapor (such as proposed in 1564 by Tomás Rodrigues da Veiga), to iatrochemical postulations of a "seminal ferment" (suggested in the late 1650s, perhaps independently, by Thomas Willis at Oxford and Lambert van Velthuysen in Utrecht), finally to a "seminal recrement" or "reabsorbed semen" concept soon after (emergent in the posthumous work of Giovanni Alfonso Borelli, among others). During the late eighteenth century, mounting controversy surrounded both the very idea of that concept and the involved anatomical pathways, informed by multiple experiments.
从 17 世纪中叶开始,人们认为睾丸“发酵物”的吸收和部分精液的吸收是第二性征的可靠解释。直到 20 世纪初,“排泄物分泌”理论才被内部分泌理论明确取代,这一进步开创了激素时代。从盖伦的《精液论》第一版 1490 年的印刷版开始,我们可以对这些原始内分泌学概念进行重建。早期的现代医生从盖伦那里广泛地研究了男性和女性睾丸对“整个身体”的影响的媒介和途径,包括对“女性气质”和“男性气质”的身体、心理气质和行为的影响。可以从“热量和力量”(盖伦)到血液携带的“活力”或睾丸蒸汽(如 1564 年由托马斯·罗德里格斯·达·维加提出),再到“精液发酵”的治疗化学假设(1650 年代后期,可能由牛津的托马斯·威利斯和乌得勒支的兰伯特·范·韦尔休森独立提出),最后到“精液排泄物”或“被吸收的精液”概念(在其他人的作品中,如乔瓦尼·阿方索·博雷利的遗作)。在 18 世纪后期,人们对这个概念的存在和涉及的解剖途径的争议越来越大,这是由多次实验提供的信息所引起的。