Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Nov;39(15):2888-2894. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08841-4. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
Approximately 25% of patients that present to the emergency department (ED) do so after contact with a healthcare professional. Many of these patients could be effectively managed in non-ED ambulatory settings. Aligning patients with safe and appropriate outpatient care has the potential to improve ED overcrowding, patient experience, outcomes, and costs. Little is understood about how healthcare providers approach triage decision-making and what factors influence their choices.
To evaluate how providers think about patient triage, and what factors influence their decision-making when triaging patient calls.
Cross-sectional survey-based study in which participants make triage decisions for hypothetical clinical scenarios.
Healthcare providers in the specialties of internal medicine, family medicine, or emergency medicine within a large integrated healthcare system in the Southeast.
Differences in individual training and practice characteristics were used to compare observed differences in triage outcomes. Free-response data were evaluated to identify themes and factors affecting triage decisions.
Out of 72 total participants, substantial variability in triage decision-making was observed among all patient cases. Attending physicians triaged 1.4 fewer cases to ED care compared with resident physicians (p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.62-2.1). Academic attendings demonstrated a trend toward fewer cases to ED care compared with community attendings (0.61, p = 0.188, 95% CI - 0.31-1.5). Qualitative data highlighted the complex considerations in provider triage and led to the development of a novel conceptual model to describe the cognitive triage process and the main influencing factors.
Triage decision-making for healthcare providers is influenced by many factors related to clinical resources, care coordination, patient factors, and clinician factors. The complex considerations involved yield variability in triage decisions that is largely unexplained by descriptive physician factors.
大约 25%到急诊科就诊的患者是在与医疗保健专业人员接触后就诊的。这些患者中有许多可以在非急诊科门诊环境中得到有效管理。使患者与安全和合适的门诊护理相匹配有可能改善急诊科过度拥挤、患者体验、结果和成本。对于医疗保健提供者如何考虑分诊决策以及哪些因素影响他们的选择,了解甚少。
评估提供者如何考虑患者分诊,以及在分诊患者来电时影响他们决策的因素。
横断面调查研究,参与者对假设的临床情景进行分诊决策。
来自东南部一家大型综合医疗保健系统的内科、家庭医学或急诊医学专业的医疗保健提供者。
使用个体培训和实践特征的差异来比较观察到的分诊结果差异。评估自由响应数据以确定影响分诊决策的主题和因素。
在 72 名总参与者中,所有患者病例的分诊决策存在很大差异。主治医生分诊到急诊科的病例比住院医生少 1.4 例(p < 0.001,95%CI 0.62-2.1)。与社区主治医生相比,学术主治医生分诊到急诊科的病例有减少的趋势(0.61,p = 0.188,95%CI-0.31-1.5)。定性数据突出了提供者分诊中的复杂考虑因素,并导致开发了一个新的概念模型来描述认知分诊过程和主要影响因素。
医疗保健提供者的分诊决策受到与临床资源、护理协调、患者因素和临床医生因素相关的许多因素的影响。涉及的复杂考虑因素导致分诊决策存在很大差异,这些差异在很大程度上无法用描述性医生因素来解释。