A perspective on human cell models for POLG-spectrum disorders: advantages and disadvantages of CRISPR-Cas-based vs. patient-derived iPSC models.

Neurogenetic diseases represent a broad group of diseases with variable genetic causes and clinical manifestations. Among these, polymerase-gamma (POLG)-spectrum disorders are relatively frequent with an estimated disease frequency of ∼1:10.000. Also, mutations in the gene are by far the most important cause for mitochondriopathy. POLG-spectrum disorders usually result in progressive loss of brain function and may involve severe and deadly encephalopathy, seizures, and neuromuscular disease, as well as cardiac and hepatic failure in some cases. Onset of disease may range from birth to late adulthood, and disease duration ranges from weeks in severe cases to decades. There is no curative treatment; current animal models do not faithfully recapitulate human disease, complicating preclinical therapeutic studies. Human-based preclinical model systems must be developed to understand the human disease mechanisms and develop therapeutic approaches. In this review, we provide an overview of the current approaches to model neurogenetic disorders in a human cellular and neuronal environment with a focus on POLG-spectrum disorders. We discuss the necessity of using neuronal cells and the advantages and pitfalls of currently available cell model approaches, namely (i) CRISPR-based (i. e., genetically engineered) and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) (i. e., stem cell like)-derived neuronal models and (ii) the reprogramming of patient-derived cells into iPSCs and derived neurons. Despite the fact that cell models are by definition systems incapable of recapitulating all aspects of human disease, they are still the reasonable point of start to discover disease mechanisms and develop therapeutic approaches to treat neurogenetic diseases.