Suppr超能文献

α-2激动剂与α-1拮抗剂治疗小儿创伤后应激障碍相关噩梦的比较。

Comparison of alpha-2 agonist versus alpha-1 antagonist for post-traumatic stress disorder-associated nightmares in pediatric patients.

作者信息

Khalid Seher, Mitchell Sandra, Al-Mateen Cheryl

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System Department, Richmond, Virginia.

Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System Department of Psychiatry, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Richmond, Virginia.

出版信息

Ment Health Clin. 2024 Jun 3;14(3):199-203. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2024.06.199. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in children and adolescents has a high prevalence of accompanying sleep disturbances. Currently, pediatric treatment of PTSD-related nightmares is extrapolated from adult studies. This study aims to determine the effectiveness and safety of clonidine and guanfacine compared with prazosin for the treatment of PTSD-related nightmares.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center, medical record review of patients 5 to 17 years old admitted to an inpatient psychiatric unit from January 2015 to September 2021. Patients with a new initiation of an alpha-2 agonist (clonidine or guanfacine) or an alpha-1 antagonist (prazosin) with a diagnosis of PTSD, other trauma- or stressor-related disorder or unspecified anxiety disorder were included. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with a decrease in the frequency of nightmares.

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients were included in the study: 37 in the alpha-2 agonist group and 22 in the alpha-1 antagonist group. There was no statistically significant difference in reduction of nightmares with both groups having a high percentage of patients showing response (alpha-2 agonist: 91.9%, alpha-1 antagonist: 86.4%). Time to decrease in nightmares was comparable between groups with a relatively quick onset. Within the alpha-2 agonist group, clonidine (1.59 ± 1.06 days) compared with guanfacine (3.18 ± 1.74 days) had a statistically significant faster time to reduction in nightmares ( = .005).

DISCUSSION

Both pharmacologic classes of medications were effective treatment options for pediatric PTSD-associated nightmares with a low incidence of adverse effects. There was a quick time to onset seen with all agents.

摘要

引言

儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)常伴有睡眠障碍。目前,PTSD相关噩梦的儿科治疗方法是从成人研究中推断而来的。本研究旨在确定可乐定和胍法辛与哌唑嗪相比,治疗PTSD相关噩梦的有效性和安全性。

方法

这是一项回顾性、单中心的病历审查研究,研究对象为2015年1月至2021年9月入住住院精神科病房的5至17岁患者。纳入新开始使用α-2激动剂(可乐定或胍法辛)或α-1拮抗剂(哌唑嗪)且诊断为PTSD、其他创伤或应激源相关障碍或未特定的焦虑症的患者。主要终点是噩梦频率降低的患者百分比。

结果

共有59名患者纳入研究:α-2激动剂组37名,α-1拮抗剂组22名。两组在减少噩梦方面无统计学显著差异,两组中显示有反应的患者百分比都很高(α-2激动剂组:91.9%,α-1拮抗剂组:86.4%)。两组之间噩梦减少的时间相当,起效相对较快。在α-2激动剂组中,可乐定(1.59±1.06天)与胍法辛(3.18±1.74天)相比,噩梦减少的时间在统计学上显著更快(P = 0.005)。

讨论

这两类药物都是治疗儿童PTSD相关噩梦的有效选择,不良反应发生率低。所有药物起效时间都很快。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be0/11147653/69ac69979148/i2168-9709-14-3-199-f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验