Suppr超能文献

关于小儿麻醉中使用带套囊和不带套囊气管内导管的当前态度和临床实践的系统评价

A Systematic Review on the Current Attitudes and Clinical Practices on the Use of Cuffed and Uncuffed Endotracheal Tubes in Pediatric Anesthesia.

作者信息

Abainza Lalaine O, Ferrolino Jose Emil A, Espina-Bertoso Sheila B

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila.

出版信息

Acta Med Philipp. 2024 May 23;58(9):22-29. doi: 10.47895/amp.v58i9.8743. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For several decades now, the use of uncuffed endotracheal tube (ETT) is the gold standard in providing airway and ventilatory support to children under anesthesia. However, there has been a change in focus from the application of uncuffed ETT to cuffed ETT among children, and this matter has been debated for years. In fact, several studies have shown that even across and within countries, the attitudes and practices of anesthesiologists on the use of types of endotracheal tubes differed.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the current attitudes and practices of anesthesiologists regarding the use of uncuffed or cuffed ETT for children.

METHODS

A systematic review of observational studies on the current attitudes and practices of pediatric anesthesiologists regarding the use of cuffed and uncuffed ETT was conducted from May to November 2020. Cochrane reviews, Medline, Pubmed, and EMBASE were searched and yielded five relevant studies.

RESULTS

The use of cuffed ETT ranged between 11%-61% in the included studies and all reported that there were no consensus or standard on whether cuffed or uncuffed ETT was better. Reported factors for cuffed ETT use included: 1) Personal choice, 2) Department protocol, 3) Availability of resources, and 4) Specific conditions such as obesity, planned or emergency procedure, and reduced lung compliance. In terms of ETT size, reported criteria were: 1) Use of a formula, 2) Use of abacus/calculator, and 3) In relation to the fifth finger's width.

CONCLUSIONS

The current systematic review demonstrated that there is wide variation in current attitudes and practices of anesthesiologists regarding the use of uncuffed or cuffed endotracheal tubes in children. Likewise, factors affecting choice of ETT and criteria for selection varied in the published literature. The results of this systematic review highlight the need for a standard guideline to help clinicians choose if cuffed or uncuffed ETT is better in certain scenarios and to help them decide in selecting the most appropriate ETT size.

摘要

背景

几十年来,使用无套囊气管内导管(ETT)一直是为麻醉状态下的儿童提供气道和通气支持的金标准。然而,在儿童中,关注焦点已从无套囊ETT的应用转向有套囊ETT,并且这个问题已经争论多年。事实上,多项研究表明,即使在不同国家之间以及同一国家内部,麻醉医生对于气管内导管类型使用的态度和做法也存在差异。

目的

描述麻醉医生目前对于儿童使用无套囊或有套囊ETT的态度和做法。

方法

于2020年5月至11月对关于儿科麻醉医生使用有套囊和无套囊ETT的当前态度和做法的观察性研究进行了系统评价。检索了Cochrane系统评价、Medline、Pubmed和EMBASE,共获得五项相关研究。

结果

在纳入的研究中,有套囊ETT的使用比例在11%至61%之间,所有研究均报告对于有套囊或无套囊ETT哪种更好没有达成共识或标准。报告的使用有套囊ETT的因素包括:1)个人选择;2)科室规程;3)资源可用性;4)特定情况,如肥胖、计划内或急诊手术以及肺顺应性降低。在ETT尺寸方面,报告的标准有:1)使用公式;2)使用算盘/计算器;3)与小指宽度相关。

结论

当前的系统评价表明,麻醉医生目前对于儿童使用无套囊或有套囊气管内导管的态度和做法存在很大差异。同样,已发表文献中影响ETT选择的因素和选择标准也各不相同。该系统评价的结果凸显了需要一个标准指南,以帮助临床医生在某些情况下选择有套囊还是无套囊ETT更好,并帮助他们决定选择最合适的ETT尺寸。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1438/11144826/9663cdfe3f04/AMP-58-9-8743-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验