Suppr超能文献

颅内刺激治疗顽固性疼痛疾病时疼痛减轻的发生率及预测因素

Rates and Predictors of Pain Reduction With Intracranial Stimulation for Intractable Pain Disorders.

作者信息

Huang Yuhao, Sadeghzadeh Sina, Li Alice Huai-Yu, Schonfeld Ethan, Ramayya Ashwin G, Buch Vivek P

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto , California , USA.

Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto , California , USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2024 Dec 1;95(6):1245-1262. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003006. Epub 2024 Jun 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Intracranial modulation paradigms, namely deep brain stimulation (DBS) and motor cortex stimulation (MCS), have been used to treat intractable pain disorders. However, treatment efficacy remains heterogeneous, and factors associated with pain reduction are not completely understood.

METHODS

We performed an individual patient review of pain outcomes (visual analog scale, quality-of-life measures, complications, pulse generator implant rate, cessation of stimulation) after implantation of DBS or MCS devices. We evaluated 663 patients from 36 study groups and stratified outcomes by pain etiology and implantation targets.

RESULTS

Included studies comprised primarily retrospective cohort studies. MCS patients had a similar externalized trial success rate compared with DBS patients (86% vs 81%; P = .16), whereas patients with peripheral pain had a higher trial success rate compared with patients with central pain (88% vs 79%; P = .004). Complication rates were similar for MCS and DBS patients (12% vs 15%; P = .79). Patients with peripheral pain had lower likelihood of device cessation compared with those with central pain (5.7% vs 10%; P = .03). Of all implanted patients, mean pain reduction at last follow-up was 45.8% (95% CI: 40.3-51.2) with a 31.2% (95% CI: 12.4-50.1) improvement in quality of life. No difference was seen between MCS patients (43.8%; 95% CI: 36.7-58.2) and DBS patients (48.6%; 95% CI: 39.2-58) or central (41.5%; 95% CI: 34.8-48.2) and peripheral (46.7%; 95% CI: 38.9-54.5) etiologies. Multivariate analysis identified the anterior cingulate cortex target to be associated with worse pain reduction, while postherpetic neuralgia was a positive prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

Both DBS and MCS have similar efficacy and complication rates in the treatment of intractable pain. Patients with central pain disorders tended to have lower trial success and higher rates of device cessation. Additional prognostic factors include anterior cingulate cortex targeting and postherpetic neuralgia diagnosis. These findings underscore intracranial neurostimulation as an important modality for treatment of intractable pain disorders.

摘要

背景与目的

颅内调节模式,即深部脑刺激(DBS)和运动皮层刺激(MCS),已被用于治疗顽固性疼痛疾病。然而,治疗效果仍然存在异质性,且与疼痛减轻相关的因素尚未完全明确。

方法

我们对植入DBS或MCS设备后的疼痛结局(视觉模拟量表、生活质量指标、并发症、脉冲发生器植入率、刺激停止情况)进行了个体患者回顾。我们评估了来自36个研究组的663例患者,并根据疼痛病因和植入靶点对结局进行分层。

结果

纳入的研究主要为回顾性队列研究。MCS患者与DBS患者的外部试验成功率相似(86%对81%;P = 0.16),而外周性疼痛患者的试验成功率高于中枢性疼痛患者(88%对79%;P = 0.004)。MCS和DBS患者的并发症发生率相似(12%对15%;P = 0.79)。与中枢性疼痛患者相比,外周性疼痛患者设备停止使用的可能性更低(5.7%对10%;P = 0.03)。在所有植入患者中,末次随访时平均疼痛减轻45.8%(95%CI:40.3 - 51.2),生活质量改善31.2%(95%CI:12.4 - 50.1)。MCS患者(43.8%;95%CI:36.7 - 58.2)与DBS患者(48.6%;95%CI:39.2 - 58)之间,以及中枢性(41.5%;95%CI:34.8 - 48.2)和外周性(46.7%;95%CI:38.9 - 54.5)病因患者之间均未观察到差异。多变量分析确定前扣带回皮层靶点与疼痛减轻较差相关,而带状疱疹后神经痛是一个阳性预后因素。

结论

DBS和MCS在治疗顽固性疼痛方面具有相似的疗效和并发症发生率。中枢性疼痛障碍患者的试验成功率往往较低,设备停止使用的发生率较高。其他预后因素包括前扣带回皮层靶点定位和带状疱疹后神经痛诊断。这些发现强调了颅内神经刺激作为治疗顽固性疼痛疾病的一种重要方式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验