Istituto di Psicoterapia Relazionale, Pisa, Italy.
Institute of Clinical Physiology of the Italian National Research Council (IFC-CNR), Pisa, Italy.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Oct;30(7):1272-1282. doi: 10.1111/jep.14039. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
Despite being mentioned in well-known models of psychotherapeutic change, the concept of extra-therapeutic factors seems to have left the scene across time, eaten away by the progressive refinement of the construct of common factors. Aim of the present study is to better understanding the historical evolution of the concept of extra-therapeutic factors and its importance for psychotherapy today.
This is a position paper based on a literature review on extra-therapeutic factors and psychotherapy outcome and process.
There is growing evidence of the decisive role of clients' and therapists' characteristics, as well as of the importance of therapeutic alliances and relationships in promoting change. Within this context, the concept of extra-therapeutic factors still deserves proper attention, rather than being relegated to a residual and vanishing category.
A renewed interest on extra-therapeutic factors could reinvigorate the debate over the relationship between psychotherapy and life contexts and conditions. In terms of complexity and systems thinking nothing, a priori, really falls outside the realm of psychotherapy and, in turn, psychotherapy is not a practice that could be abstracted from the context in which it is practiced or from clients' and therapists' lives.
尽管在著名的心理治疗变化模型中有所提及,但随着共同因素这一概念的不断完善,治疗外因素的概念似乎已经过时,逐渐消失。本研究旨在更好地了解治疗外因素的概念的历史演变及其对当今心理治疗的重要性。
这是一篇基于治疗外因素和心理治疗结果及过程文献综述的立场文件。
越来越多的证据表明,客户和治疗师的特征,以及治疗联盟和关系的重要性,对促进变化起着决定性的作用。在这种情况下,治疗外因素的概念仍然值得引起关注,而不是被归为残余和消失的范畴。
对治疗外因素的重新关注可能会重新激发关于心理治疗与生活环境和条件之间关系的争论。从复杂性和系统思维的角度来看,没有什么是完全在心理治疗范围之外的,反过来,心理治疗也不能脱离其所处的环境或客户和治疗师的生活而独立存在。