Suppr超能文献

老年人(65+)抑郁的风险因素和保护因素。系统评价。

Risk factors and protective factors of depression in older people 65+. A systematic review.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 13;16(5):e0251326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251326. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Identifying risk factors of depression can provide a better understanding of the disorder in older people. However, to minimize bias due to the influence of confounders and to detect reverse influence, a focus on longitudinal studies using multivariate analysis is required.

DESIGN

A systematic literature search was conducted by searching the databases MEDLINE, Cochrane, PsycINFO and Web of Science for all relevant articles published from January 2000 to the end of March 2020. The following inclusion criteria were used: prospective design, nationally or regionally representative sample, published in English or German, analyzed risk factors for depression of individuals 65+ identified by multivariate analysis, and provided validity of diagnostic instrument. All results of multivariate analysis were reported and summarized.

RESULTS

Thirty articles were identified. Heterogeneous results were found for education, female gender, self-rated health, cognitive impairment and older age, although significant in several studies. Findings hinted at a protective quality of physical activity. In terms of physical health, chronic disease and difficulty initiating sleep homogeneously increased risk of depression. Mobility impairment resulted as a risk factor in three studies. IADL impairment and vision impairment were mostly identified as significant risk factors. Alcohol consumption and smoking behavior yielded heterogenous results. Psychosocial factors were assessed similarly in multiple studies and yielded heterogenous results.

LIMITATIONS

Research was limited to articles published in English or German. Length of follow up was not considered for the presentation of results. Adjustments for and inclusion of different variables in the studies may distort results.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate the necessity of refined, more comparable assessment tools for evaluating potential risk factors.

摘要

目的

确定抑郁症的风险因素可以更好地了解老年人的这种疾病。然而,为了最大限度地减少因混杂因素影响的偏差,并检测反向影响,需要使用多变量分析关注纵向研究。

设计

通过搜索 MEDLINE、Cochrane、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science 数据库,对 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月底发表的所有相关文章进行了系统的文献检索。使用了以下纳入标准:前瞻性设计、具有全国或地区代表性的样本、以英文或德文发表、分析通过多变量分析确定的 65 岁及以上个体的抑郁风险因素,并提供诊断工具的有效性。报告并总结了所有多变量分析的结果。

结果

确定了 30 篇文章。尽管在几项研究中具有统计学意义,但教育、女性性别、自我报告的健康状况、认知障碍和年龄较大等因素的结果存在异质性。发现表明身体活动具有保护作用。就身体健康而言,慢性疾病和入睡困难均均匀增加了抑郁的风险。在三项研究中,行动能力受损被认为是一个风险因素。IADL 受损和视力受损大多被确定为显著的风险因素。饮酒和吸烟行为的结果存在异质性。在多项研究中,心理社会因素的评估相似,结果也存在异质性。

局限性

研究仅限于以英文或德文发表的文章。研究结果未考虑随访时间的长短。研究中对和纳入不同变量的调整可能会扭曲结果。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,需要更精细、更可比的评估工具来评估潜在的风险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/539d/8118343/b5316edc8865/pone.0251326.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验