Division of Health Systems and Community Based Care, College of Nursing, University of Utah, Utah, United States.
John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 May;15(3):446-455. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787007. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
Studies have shown that documentation burden experienced by clinicians may lead to less direct patient care, increased errors, and job dissatisfaction. Implementing effective strategies within health care systems to mitigate documentation burden can result in improved clinician satisfaction and more time spent with patients. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding evidence-based interventions to reduce documentation burden.
The objective of this review was to identify and comprehensively summarize the state of the science related to documentation burden reduction efforts.
Following Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of multiple databases, including PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL Complete, Scopus, and Web of Science. Additionally, we searched gray literature and used Google Scholar to ensure a thorough review. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, followed by full-text review, with a third reviewer resolving any discrepancies. Data extraction was performed and a table of evidence was created.
A total of 34 articles were included in the review, published between 2016 and 2022, with a majority focusing on the United States. The efforts described can be categorized into medical scribes, workflow improvements, educational interventions, user-driven approaches, technology-based solutions, combination approaches, and other strategies. The outcomes of these efforts often resulted in improvements in documentation time, workflow efficiency, provider satisfaction, and patient interactions.
This scoping review provides a comprehensive summary of health system documentation burden reduction efforts. The positive outcomes reported in the literature emphasize the potential effectiveness of these efforts. However, more research is needed to identify universally applicable best practices, and considerations should be given to the transfer of burden among members of the health care team, quality of education, clinician involvement, and evaluation methods.
研究表明,临床医生所经历的文档负担可能导致直接护理减少、错误增加和工作不满。在医疗保健系统中实施减轻文档负担的有效策略可以提高临床医生的满意度并增加与患者在一起的时间。然而,关于减轻文档负担的循证干预措施,文献中存在空白。
本综述的目的是确定并全面总结与减轻文档负担努力相关的科学现状。
根据 Joanna Briggs 研究所循证综合手册和系统评价与荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)指南,我们对多个数据库进行了全面搜索,包括 PubMed、Medline、Embase、CINAHL Complete、Scopus 和 Web of Science。此外,我们还搜索了灰色文献并使用 Google Scholar 以确保全面审查。两名评审员独立筛选标题和摘要,然后进行全文审查,由第三名评审员解决任何分歧。进行了数据提取并创建了证据表。
共有 34 篇文章被纳入综述,发表时间在 2016 年至 2022 年之间,其中大部分集中在美国。所描述的努力可以分为医疗抄写员、工作流程改进、教育干预、用户驱动方法、基于技术的解决方案、综合方法和其他策略。这些努力的结果往往导致文档时间、工作流程效率、提供者满意度和患者互动的改善。
本范围综述全面总结了减轻卫生系统文档负担的努力。文献中报告的积极结果强调了这些努力的潜在有效性。然而,需要更多的研究来确定普遍适用的最佳实践,并且应该考虑在医疗保健团队成员之间转移负担、教育质量、临床医生的参与和评估方法。