Duke University Center for Child and Family Policy, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
J Res Adolesc. 2024 Dec;34(4):1155-1171. doi: 10.1111/jora.12976. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
Can positive transitions into young adulthood at age 25 prevent problematic substance use at age 31, even in the context of childhood adverse family environments, conduct problems, and adolescent substance use? We lean on John Schulenberg's developmental framework to examine this question, focusing on the potential young adult milestones of high school and college graduation, employment, residential independence, romantic partnership, and parenthood. Data came from a prospective-longitudinal multi-method study with N = 1199 participants who were first assessed at age 5 years old and followed to age 31. An accumulation of positive transitions in young adulthood (age 25) was associated with lower likelihood of age 31 problematic cannabis use. The protective effect for problematic cannabis use remained even when adjusting for childhood adverse family environments and was primarily driven by successful college graduation and/or home ownership. The accumulation of positive transitions protected individuals at modest to somewhat elevated risk due to childhood adverse family environments from experiencing age 31 cannabis use problems. However, for other individuals with very high numbers of conduct problems, or with high levels of adolescent substance use, the protective effects of accumulated positive transitions to young adulthood were less strong or nonexistent. Moreover, individuals who completed college or obtained full-time employment by 25 were more likely to report problematic age 31 alcohol use. These findings highlight the central tenets of John Schulenberg's developmental framework, including the examination of ontogenetic continuity and discontinuity, the interplay of developmentally distal and proximal effects, and the identification of developmental protective factors that may sway people toward or away from substance use.
25 岁时积极进入成年期是否能预防 31 岁时出现问题的物质使用,即使是在儿童时期不良家庭环境、行为问题和青少年物质使用的背景下?我们借鉴了 John Schulenberg 的发展框架来研究这个问题,重点关注潜在的成年里程碑,如高中毕业、大学毕业、就业、独立居住、恋爱关系和为人父母。数据来自一项前瞻性纵向多方法研究,共有 1199 名参与者,他们在 5 岁时首次接受评估,并随访至 31 岁。25 岁时积极的成年过渡期(年龄)与 31 岁时出现问题的大麻使用的可能性较低有关。即使调整了儿童时期不良家庭环境,这种保护作用仍然存在,主要是由于成功完成大学学业和/或拥有住房。积极的成年过渡期的积累保护了那些由于儿童时期不良家庭环境而处于中等至较高风险的个体,使他们免受 31 岁时大麻使用问题的困扰。然而,对于那些有很多行为问题或青少年物质使用水平很高的其他个体,积累的积极过渡对成年期的保护作用则不太强或不存在。此外,到 25 岁时完成大学学业或获得全职工作的个体更有可能报告 31 岁时出现问题的酒精使用。这些发现强调了 John Schulenberg 发展框架的核心原则,包括对个体发生连续性和不连续性的考察、发展上的远因和近因的相互作用,以及确定可能影响人们是否使用物质的发展保护因素。