Neuromuscular contributions to disability in children with cerebral palsy and the impact of dynamic stretching orthoses and therapeutic exercise interventions: a narrative review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common motor disability in children. The initial lesion to the developing brain may result in a myriad of neuromuscular comorbidities, including mobility deficiencies. The neuromuscular contributions to disability and rehabilitative frameworks specific to children with CP have been investigated separately. However, few reviews have examined the relationship between neuromuscular pathophysiology and rehabilitative frameworks among children with CP. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to investigate the impact of dynamic stretching orthoses and therapeutic exercise on range of motion (ROM), aerobic capacity, and mobility in relation to the neuromuscular contributions to disability in children with CP.

METHODS

Reviews of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were conducted to identify literature focusing on the neuromuscular pathophysiology contributing to disability in children with CP and rehabilitative frameworks associated with this population. The search used a combination of keywords and subject headings to include 'cerebral palsy', 'musculoskeletal', 'neuromuscular', 'spasticity', 'rehabilitation', 'exercise', 'aerobic', and 'orthosis'. Selected manuscripts featured original cross-sectional and longitudinal research and meta-analyses.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS

A total of 303 manuscripts were initially identified through search terms, with 182 articles excluded based on title and abstract evaluation, leaving 121 manuscripts for full-text analysis. Seven studies meeting the narrative review criteria were included. Evidence supporting the efficacy of dynamic stretching orthoses for improving lower extremity ROM is inconclusive. Aerobic and progressive resistive training may be beneficial for improving aerobic capacity and muscle strength in children with CP, which may result in enhanced mobility.

CONCLUSIONS

Depending on the individual's clinical presentation, ROM and therapeutic exercise may be implemented to optimize function. Incorporating progressive resistive and aerobic exercises into a rehabilitation plan may improve mobility and aerobic capacity. As such, clinicians should consider resistance and aerobic exercise prescription as part of a long-term treatment plan for children with CP.