Suppr超能文献

通过社区调查评估以股权为重点的方法,以评估气候弹性和灾害重点。

Evaluating an equity-focused approach to assess climate resilience and disaster priorities through a community survey.

机构信息

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Duwamish River Community Coalition, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jun 6;19(6):e0302106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302106. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

As the Duwamish Valley community in Seattle, Washington, U.S.A. and other environmental justice communities nationally contend with growing risks from climate change, there have been calls for a more community-centered approach to understanding impacts and priorities to inform resilience planning. To engage community members and identify climate justice and resilience priorities, a partnership of community leaders, government-based practitioners, and academics co-produced a survey instrument and collected data from the community using the Seattle Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (SASPER), an approach adapted from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER). In addition, we conducted a process and outcome project evaluation using quantitative survey data collected from volunteers and qualitative semi-structured interviews with project team members. In October and November 2022, teams of volunteers from partner organizations collected 162 surveys from households in the Duwamish Valley. Poor air quality, extreme heat, and wildfires were among the highest reported hazards of concern. Most Duwamish Valley households agreed or strongly agreed that their neighborhood has a strong sense of community (64%) and that they have people nearby to call when they need help (69%). Forty-seven percent of households indicated willingness to get involved with resilience planning, and 62% of households said that they would use a Resilience Hub during an emergency. Survey volunteers evaluated their participation positively, with over 85% agreeing or strongly agreeing that they learned new skills, were prepared for the survey, and would participate in future assessments. The evaluation interviews underscored that while the SASPER may have demonstrated feasibility in a pre-disaster phase, CASPER may not meet all community/partner needs in the immediate disaster response phase because of its lack of focus on equity and logistical requirements. Future research should focus on identifying less resource intensive data collection approaches that maintain the rigor and reputation of CASPER while enabling a focus on equity.

摘要

随着美国华盛顿州西雅图的杜瓦米什谷社区和全国其他环境正义社区应对气候变化带来的风险日益增加,人们呼吁采取更加以社区为中心的方法来了解影响和优先事项,为韧性规划提供信息。为了让社区成员参与进来并确定气候正义和韧性优先事项,一个由社区领袖、政府从业人员和学者组成的合作伙伴关系共同制定了一份调查工具,并利用西雅图公共卫生应急响应评估(SASPER)从社区收集数据,该方法是从疾病控制与预防中心的公共卫生应急响应社区评估(CASPER)改编而来的。此外,我们还使用从志愿者那里收集的定量调查数据以及与项目团队成员进行的定性半结构化访谈,对过程和结果进行了项目评估。2022 年 10 月和 11 月,来自合作伙伴组织的志愿者团队从杜瓦米什谷的家庭中收集了 162 份调查。空气质量差、极端高温和野火是报告的最高危害之一。大多数杜瓦米什谷家庭同意或强烈同意他们的社区有一种强烈的社区感(64%),并且他们在需要帮助时附近有人可以求助(69%)。47%的家庭表示愿意参与韧性规划,62%的家庭表示在紧急情况下会使用韧性中心。调查志愿者对他们的参与给予了积极评价,超过 85%的志愿者表示他们学到了新技能、为调查做好了准备,并将参与未来的评估。评估访谈强调,虽然 SASPER 在灾前阶段可能已经证明了可行性,但由于其缺乏对公平和后勤需求的关注,CASPER 可能无法满足社区/合作伙伴在紧急响应阶段的所有需求。未来的研究应侧重于确定资源密集度较低的数据收集方法,这些方法在保持 CASPER 的严谨性和声誉的同时,能够关注公平问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fb7/11156407/fcf1c9b743b6/pone.0302106.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验