Min Esther, Piazza Millie, Galaviz Vanessa E, Saganić Erik, Schmeltz Michael, Freelander Lauren, Farquhar Stephanie A, Karr Catherine J, Gruen Deric, Banerjee Debolina, Yost Michael, Seto Edmund Y W
Dr. Esther Min is Research Consultant at the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. Dr. Millie Piazza is an Environmental Justice & Title VI Senior Advisor at Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington, USA. Dr. Vanessa E. Galaviz is EJ Public Health Scientist at California Environmental Protection Agency Office of the Secretary and California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Sacramento, California, USA. Erik Saganić is Manager of Technical Analysis at Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Seattle, Washington, USA. Dr. Michael Schmeltz is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Public Health, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, California, USA. Lauren Freelander is Spatial Epidemiologist & Radon Director at Washington State Department of Health, Olympia, Washington, USA. Dr. Stephanie A. Farquhar is Associate Dean & Clinical Professor at Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences and Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. Dr. Catherine J. Karr is a Professor at the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences and Department of Pediatrics, and Director of Northwest Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Unit, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. Deric Gruen is Co-Executive Director, Programs and Policy at Front and Centered, Seattle, Washington, USA. Debolina Banerjee is a Climate Justice Policy Analyst at Puget Sound Sage, Seattle, Washington, USA. Dr. Michael Yost is Professor and Chair at the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. Edmund Y.W. Seto is an Associate Professor at the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Environ Justice. 2021 Aug 1;14(4):298-314. doi: 10.1089/env.2021.0021. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
Environmental racism, community stressors, and age-related susceptibility play a significant role in environmental inequality. The goal of this article was to use an inequality index (II) to assess the level of equality in environmental threats and hazards based on race, poverty, and age in Washington State. Using the Washington Environmental Health Disparities Map, we quantified the level of disproportionate burdens on communities with greater populations of people of color, people in poverty, children younger than 5, and people older than 65 using 3 cumulative environmental indices and 10 individual environmental indicators. Census tracts with a higher proportion of people of color and those with people living below 185% federal poverty levels were found to be disproportionately burdened by environmental threats (II = -0.175 and II = -0.167, respectively, < 0.001). Individual environmental indicators were found to disproportionately burden communities of color and low-income communities. Children younger than 5 were also disproportionately burdened by cumulative environmental indices (II = -0.076, < 0.001) and individual indicators. Our analysis did not show disproportionate burden of environmental health threats based on the proportion of people older than 65 (II = 0.124, < 0.001). The disproportionate burden of the cumulative environmental threats on communities of color and low-income communities in this study corroborates similar analyses. These findings can be applied in policy and regulatory actions to correct the distributive environmental disparities. We found much higher burdens among historically marginalized communities and children who are more susceptible to environmental threats and hazards.
环境种族主义、社区压力源和与年龄相关的易感性在环境不平等中起着重要作用。本文的目的是使用不平等指数(II)来评估华盛顿州基于种族、贫困和年龄的环境威胁和危害的平等程度。利用华盛顿环境卫生差异地图,我们使用3个累积环境指数和10个个体环境指标,对有色人种人口较多、贫困人口、5岁以下儿童和65岁以上人群的社区所承受的不成比例负担水平进行了量化。发现有色人种比例较高的普查区以及生活在联邦贫困水平185%以下的人群所承受的环境威胁负担不成比例(II分别为-0.175和-0.167,<0.001)。发现个体环境指标给有色人种社区和低收入社区带来了不成比例的负担。5岁以下儿童也承受着累积环境指数(II=-0.076,<0.001)和个体指标带来的不成比例负担。我们的分析未显示基于65岁以上人群比例的环境卫生威胁存在不成比例负担(II=0.124,<0.001)。本研究中累积环境威胁对有色人种社区和低收入社区造成的不成比例负担证实了类似分析。这些发现可应用于政策和监管行动,以纠正环境分配差异。我们发现,在历史上被边缘化的社区以及更容易受到环境威胁和危害的儿童中,负担要高得多。