• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于食管癌统一治疗策略的粒子治疗注册分析。

Analysis of particle therapy registries based on a unified treatment policy for esophageal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, 1-2-1 Kouto, Shingu-cho, Tatsuno, Hyogo 679-5165, Japan.

National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, QST Hospital, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.

出版信息

J Radiat Res. 2023 Jun 16;64(Supplement_1):i16-i24. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrad012.

DOI:10.1093/jrr/rrad012
PMID:37036770
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10278881/
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of particle therapy (proton beam therapy and carbon-ion radiotherapy) for esophageal cancer by analyzing prospective nationwide registry data from particle therapy facilities throughout Japan. Patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer who received particle therapy between May 2016 and June 2018 were recruited from the registries of 12 particle therapy centers in Japan. Eventually, we enrolled 174 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of the 174 patients, 137 (78.7%) were male, with a median age of 69 years (range: 41-88 years). Clinical stages included I (n = 55; 31.6%), II (n = 31; 17.8%), III (n = 82; 47.1%), IV (n = 3; 1.7%) and unknown (n = 3; 1.7%) (Union for International Cancer Control, seventh edition), and the median follow-up period was 908 days (range: 76-1669 days) for all patients. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and the 3-year local control (LC) rates were 60.5, 53.2 and 72.7%, respectively. For each clinical stage, the 3-year OS rates were I, 84.8%; II, 60.3% and III, 42.9%; the 3-year PFS rates were I, 71.9%; II, 58.3% and III, 37.0% and the 3-year LC were I, 78.4%; II, 79.8% and III, 65.2%, respectively. Notably, four patients (2.3%) with ≥Grade 3 cardiopulmonary toxicities were observed (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0). Our study showed that particle therapy for esophageal cancer has lower rates of adverse cardiopulmonary events than X-ray radiotherapy.

摘要

本研究旨在通过分析日本各粒子治疗设施的前瞻性全国注册数据,评估粒子治疗(质子束治疗和碳离子放疗)在食管癌中的疗效和安全性。从日本 12 个粒子治疗中心的注册处招募了 2016 年 5 月至 2018 年 6 月期间接受粒子治疗的食管癌患者。最终,我们共纳入了 174 名符合纳入标准的患者。在这 174 名患者中,137 名(78.7%)为男性,中位年龄为 69 岁(范围:41-88 岁)。临床分期包括 I 期(n=55;31.6%)、II 期(n=31;17.8%)、III 期(n=82;47.1%)、IV 期(n=3;1.7%)和未知期(n=3;1.7%)(国际抗癌联盟第七版),所有患者的中位随访时间为 908 天(范围:76-1669 天)。3 年总生存率(OS)、3 年无进展生存率(PFS)和 3 年局部控制率(LC)分别为 60.5%、53.2%和 72.7%。对于每个临床分期,3 年 OS 率分别为 I 期,84.8%;II 期,60.3%和 III 期,42.9%;3 年 PFS 率分别为 I 期,71.9%;II 期,58.3%和 III 期,37.0%和 3 年 LC 分别为 I 期,78.4%;II 期,79.8%和 III 期,65.2%。值得注意的是,观察到 4 名(2.3%)患者发生≥3 级心肺毒性(不良事件常用术语标准,版本 5.0)。我们的研究表明,与 X 射线放疗相比,粒子治疗食管癌的不良反应心肺事件发生率较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e2/10278881/238f183ba789/rrad012f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e2/10278881/fc70043d76d6/rrad012f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e2/10278881/cbbbde85fa8b/rrad012f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e2/10278881/238f183ba789/rrad012f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e2/10278881/fc70043d76d6/rrad012f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e2/10278881/cbbbde85fa8b/rrad012f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e2/10278881/238f183ba789/rrad012f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of particle therapy registries based on a unified treatment policy for esophageal cancer.基于食管癌统一治疗策略的粒子治疗注册分析。
J Radiat Res. 2023 Jun 16;64(Supplement_1):i16-i24. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrad012.
2
Proton Beam Therapy for Histologically or Clinically Diagnosed Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): The First Nationwide Retrospective Study in Japan.质子束治疗组织学或临床诊断为 I 期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC):日本的首次全国性回顾性研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Jan 1;106(1):82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.09.013. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
3
Proton and carbon ion radiotherapy for operable early-stage lung cancer; a prospective nationwide registry.质子和碳离子放疗治疗可手术早期肺癌:一项前瞻性全国登记研究。
Radiother Oncol. 2024 Sep;198:110385. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110385. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
4
Long-term outcome of proton therapy and carbon-ion therapy for large (T2a-T2bN0M0) non-small-cell lung cancer.质子治疗和碳离子治疗大型(T2a-T2bN0M0)非小细胞肺癌的长期结果。
J Thorac Oncol. 2013 Jun;8(6):726-35. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318288ab02.
5
Efficacy and safety of particle therapy for inoperable stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.无法手术的 II-III 期非小细胞肺癌的粒子治疗的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Radiat Oncol. 2023 May 22;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02264-x.
6
Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of High-Dose Proton Beam Therapy for Peripheral Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.外周I期非小细胞肺癌大剂量质子束治疗的临床结果及预后因素
Clin Lung Cancer. 2016 Sep;17(5):427-432. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
7
Clinical Results of Proton Beam Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Multicenter Retrospective Study in Japan.日本食管癌质子束治疗的临床结果:多中心回顾性研究
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jul 16;11(7):993. doi: 10.3390/cancers11070993.
8
Particle beam radiation therapy for sinonasal malignancies: Single institutional experience at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center.粒子束放射治疗鼻窦恶性肿瘤:上海质子重离子中心的单机构经验。
Cancer Med. 2020 Nov;9(21):7914-7924. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3393. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
9
Proton Beam Radiotherapy and Concurrent Chemotherapy for Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Final Results of a Phase 2 Study.质子束放射治疗联合化疗治疗不可切除的 III 期非小细胞肺癌:一项 2 期研究的最终结果。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Aug 10;3(8):e172032. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.2032.
10
Multi-Institutional Prospective Study of Reirradiation with Proton Beam Radiotherapy for Locoregionally Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.多机构前瞻性研究质子束放射治疗局部复发性非小细胞肺癌。
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Feb;12(2):281-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.10.018. Epub 2016 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in patients with locally advanced unresectable esophageal cancer: development and validation study.预测局部晚期不可切除食管癌患者癌症特异性生存的列线图:开发与验证研究
Front Immunol. 2025 Feb 14;16:1524439. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1524439. eCollection 2025.
2
Cost-utility analysis of proton beam therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer in Japan.质子束治疗在日本局部晚期食管癌的成本-效用分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 27;19(9):e0308961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308961. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparison of proton-based definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery-based therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective Japanese cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2013.日本 2013 年食管癌综合登记报告。
Esophagus. 2021 Jan;18(1):1-24. doi: 10.1007/s10388-020-00785-y. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
3
Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with proton or photon radiation for adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.
质子根治性放化疗与以手术为基础的治疗在食管鳞癌中的比较:一项多中心回顾性日本队列研究。
Esophagus. 2024 Oct;21(4):484-494. doi: 10.1007/s10388-024-01068-6. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
4
Outcomes of definitive carbon-ion radiotherapy for cT1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.根治性碳离子放疗治疗 cT1bN0M0 期食管鳞癌的结果。
Esophagus. 2024 Oct;21(4):523-529. doi: 10.1007/s10388-024-01067-7. Epub 2024 May 30.
采用质子或光子放疗的新辅助放化疗治疗食管腺癌和胃食管交界腺癌后的病理完全缓解(pCR)率及预后。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Aug;11(4):663-673. doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-205.
4
Incidence and Onset of Severe Cardiac Events After Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer.食管癌放疗后严重心脏事件的发生率和发病时间。
J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Oct;15(10):1682-1690. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.06.014. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
5
Randomized Phase IIB Trial of Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.随机化的质子束治疗与调强放射治疗局部晚期食管癌的 IIB 期临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 10;38(14):1569-1579. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02503. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
6
Clinical Results of Proton Beam Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Multicenter Retrospective Study in Japan.日本食管癌质子束治疗的临床结果:多中心回顾性研究
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jul 16;11(7):993. doi: 10.3390/cancers11070993.
7
Efficacy of Endoscopic Resection and Selective Chemoradiotherapy for Stage I Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.内镜切除与选择性放化疗治疗Ⅰ期食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效比较。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Aug;157(2):382-390.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.04.017. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
8
Lymphocyte-Sparing Effect of Proton Therapy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Treated with Definitive Chemoradiation.质子治疗对接受根治性放化疗的食管癌患者的淋巴细胞 sparing 效应。 (注:这里“sparing”可能有误,推测原文可能是“sparing effect”,即“ sparing效应”,但按要求未做修改,直接翻译了原词)
Int J Part Ther. 2018 Winter;4(3):23-32. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-17-00033.1.
9
Dosimetric comparison between proton beam therapy and photon radiation therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.质子束治疗与光子放射治疗局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌的剂量学比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Feb 9;13(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-0966-5.
10
Comparative Outcomes After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Using Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Institutional Analysis.质子束治疗与调强放疗治疗食管癌的根治性放化疗后对比结果:一项回顾性单机构分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Nov 1;99(3):667-676. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.2450. Epub 2017 Jun 27.