• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孤立性冠状动脉瘤的危险因素和主要不良心血管事件:一项观察性研究。

Risk factors and major adverse cardiovascular events of isolated coronary artery ectasia: An observational study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.

School of Nursing, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 7;103(23):e38413. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038413.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000038413
PMID:38847735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11155586/
Abstract

To evaluate the cardiac index and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) events between isolated coronary artery ectasia (CAE) and control groups over 1 year period from diagnosis. A total of 18 patients who were diagnosed with isolated CAE in the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from December 2020 to December 2021 were included in CAE group. About 36 patients with non-obstructive coronary artery lesions were included in the control group. All patients in 2 groups completed dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) during hospitalization. The chamber size, wall thickness, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left ventricular diastolic function indicators (including E/A ratio, e', and E/e' ratio) were measured. MACE and all-cause death were measured during follow-up after discharge. Interventricular septum thickness (IVSd), left ventricular posterior wall (LVPW) thickness in diastole and E/e' in CAE group were significantly higher than control group (P < .05). No significant differences were found in prognosis including angina, myocardial ischemia (MI), patient readmission and cardiovascular death (P > .05). In CAE group, coronary angiography showed dilation of left anterior descending (LAD) in 1 case, left circumflex (LCX) in 3 cases and right coronary artery (RCA) in 14 cases. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that BMI and IVSd were independent risk factors for CAE. IVSd, LVPW thickness in diastole and E/e' in CAE group were significantly higher than control group. BMI and IVSd were independent risk factors for isolated CAE, and had a good predictive value for isolated CAE.

摘要

评估孤立性冠状动脉瘤(CAE)和对照组患者在诊断后 1 年内的心脏指数和主要不良心血管事件(MACE)事件。本研究纳入了 2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 12 月在河北医科大学第二医院诊断为孤立性 CAE 的 18 例患者为 CAE 组,纳入了 36 例非阻塞性冠状动脉病变患者为对照组。两组患者在住院期间均完成了多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图(DSE)检查,测量了腔室大小、壁厚度、左心室射血分数和左心室舒张功能指标(包括 E/A 比值、e'和 E/e'比值)。出院后随访期间测量了 MACE 和全因死亡事件。CAE 组的室间隔厚度(IVSd)、舒张期左心室后壁(LVPW)厚度和 E/e'均显著高于对照组(P<0.05),但在预后方面(包括心绞痛、心肌缺血(MI)、患者再入院和心血管死亡)无显著差异(P>0.05)。CAE 组冠状动脉造影显示左前降支(LAD)扩张 1 例,左回旋支(LCX)扩张 3 例,右冠状动脉(RCA)扩张 14 例。多因素逻辑回归分析显示 BMI 和 IVSd 是 CAE 的独立危险因素。CAE 组的 IVSd、舒张期 LVPW 厚度和 E/e'均显著高于对照组。BMI 和 IVSd 是孤立性 CAE 的独立危险因素,对孤立性 CAE 有较好的预测价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2589/11155586/32e735e56853/medi-103-e38413-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2589/11155586/a66ee8a83e22/medi-103-e38413-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2589/11155586/32e735e56853/medi-103-e38413-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2589/11155586/a66ee8a83e22/medi-103-e38413-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2589/11155586/32e735e56853/medi-103-e38413-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors and major adverse cardiovascular events of isolated coronary artery ectasia: An observational study.孤立性冠状动脉瘤的危险因素和主要不良心血管事件:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 7;103(23):e38413. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038413.
2
[Coronary artery ectasia: its frequency and relationship with atherosclerotic risk factors in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization].[冠状动脉扩张:其在接受心导管检查患者中的发生率及其与动脉粥样硬化危险因素的关系]
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2011 Jun;11(4):280-4. doi: 10.5152/akd.2011.076. Epub 2011 May 5.
3
Diffuse coronary artery dilation predicted worse long-term outcomes in patients with coronary artery Ectasia.弥漫性冠状动脉扩张预示着冠状动脉扩张症患者的长期预后更差。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Nov 15;319:20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.054. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
4
Correlation of increased corrected TIMI frame counts and the topographical extent of isolated coronary artery ectasia.校正的心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)帧数增加与孤立性冠状动脉扩张的地形范围的相关性。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 May 22;18(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0833-1.
5
Coronary Artery Aneurysm Differs From Coronary Artery Ectasia: Angiographic Characteristics and Cardiovascular Risk Factor Analysis in Patients Referred for Coronary Angiography.冠状动脉瘤与冠状动脉扩张的差异:接受冠状动脉造影患者的血管造影特征及心血管危险因素分析
Angiology. 2017 Oct;68(9):823-830. doi: 10.1177/0003319716665690. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
6
Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Stenoses, Markis Class, and Ectasia Ratio in Patients with Coronary Artery Ectasia.冠状动脉扩张患者中冠状动脉狭窄、Markis分级及扩张率的预后价值
Cardiology. 2015;131(4):251-9. doi: 10.1159/000381702. Epub 2015 May 12.
7
Effects of co-existence of coronary stenosis and the extent of coronary ectasia on the TIMI frame count in patients with coronary artery ectasia.冠状动脉扩张患者中冠状动脉狭窄并存及冠状动脉扩张程度对心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)帧数的影响。
Int Heart J. 2005 Mar;46(2):211-8. doi: 10.1536/ihj.46.211.
8
Clinical Predictors of Coronary Artery Ectasia.冠状动脉扩张的临床预测因素
Angiology. 2023 Oct;74(9):876-880. doi: 10.1177/00033197221126251. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
9
[Coronary artery ectasia: clinical and angiographical evaluation].[冠状动脉扩张:临床与血管造影评估]
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2008 Dec;36(8):530-5.
10
Coronary artery ectasia diagnosed using multidetector computed tomography: morphology and relation to coronary artery calcification.冠状动脉瘤多排 CT 诊断:形态与冠状动脉钙化的关系。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Feb;29(2):427-33. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0079-4. Epub 2012 Jun 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Paradoxical sinus deceleration during dobutamine stress echocardiography: case series and review of the literature.多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图检查时的矛盾性窦性心动过缓:病例系列及文献综述
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2022 Apr 26;6(10):ytac180. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytac180. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Increased serum resistin levels associated with isolated coronary artery ectasia.血清抵抗素水平升高与孤立性冠状动脉扩张相关。
Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2022 Aug 31;7:e124-e130. doi: 10.5114/amsad/151954. eCollection 2022.
3
Treatment and Outcome of Patients With Coronary Artery Ectasia: Current Evidence and Novel Opportunities for an Old Dilemma.
冠状动脉扩张患者的治疗与预后:旧难题的当前证据与新机遇
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 4;8:805727. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.805727. eCollection 2021.
4
Hypertension and coronary artery ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis study.高血压与冠状动脉扩张:一项系统评价和荟萃分析研究
Clin Hypertens. 2021 Jul 15;27(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40885-021-00170-6.
5
Diffuse coronary artery dilation predicted worse long-term outcomes in patients with coronary artery Ectasia.弥漫性冠状动脉扩张预示着冠状动脉扩张症患者的长期预后更差。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Nov 15;319:20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.054. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
6
Risk factors for coronary artery ectasia and the relationship between hyperlipidemia and coronary artery ectasia.冠状动脉扩张的危险因素以及高脂血症与冠状动脉扩张之间的关系。
Coron Artery Dis. 2019 May;30(3):211-215. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000709.
7
Isolated coronary artery ectasia: Clinical, angiographic, and follow up characteristics.孤立性冠状动脉扩张:临床、血管造影及随访特征
Indian Heart J. 2017 Sep-Oct;69(5):619-623. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.12.017. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
8
Reproducible Computer-Assisted Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 Oct;43(10):2235-2246. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
9
Coronary Artery Ectasia-A Review of Current Literature.冠状动脉扩张——当前文献综述
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2016;12(4):318-323. doi: 10.2174/1573403x12666160504100159.
10
Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.超声心动图评估左心室舒张功能的建议:美国超声心动图学会和欧洲心血管影像学会的更新
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016 Apr;29(4):277-314. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.01.011.